Posted on 01/07/2008 1:57:23 PM PST by mnehring
Ron Paul Lunatics
Sean returns to his hotel after crazy Ron Paul protesters rallied outside of a restaurant he was visiting in Manchester, New Hampshire.
Video Link: http://zshn.fimc.net//Article.asp?id=543226
--my comments--
According to Ron Paul forums, about 200 Paul supporters were part of this attack on Sean. They claim they were only throwing snowballs but the videos make it clear they were throwing bottles and other items other than snowballs.
Warning, foul language by Paul supporters.
Do you have any evidence that he's being primarily sponsored by Soros (considering his median donation is $50 bucks and mean is like $140)? I have several officer friends in the Army and Air Force, and all actually think quite highly of Ron Paul. They disagree with him, like myself, on Iraq (mainly because it would be disasterous at this point to pull out prematurely) but overall, he's the anti-socialist and anti-government largess--and we need people like him. I will NOT vote for another statist with an R beside their name. I'll vote for Hunter and Thompson gladly. I'd vote for Paul and *maybe* Romney. If it's anyone besides these 4, I'll be sitting out the next election.
“POS Paul also compared the deaths on 9/11 of innocent civilians due to the largest terrorist attack on our soil to automobile deaths.”
Only if you have a 2nd grade level reading comprehension.
Anyone more sophisticated by that made sense of what he said.
"If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals — if we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is.”
—Ronald Reagan
Source: Reason Magazine, Jul. 1, 1975
Yup, those embarrassing Texans really ought to stay out of the Republican Party. BTW while Ron Paul is a libertarian, he disagrees with the LParty on numerous issues including abortion and border patrol/immigration.
I’ve listened to the man’s own words, and based on what he stated I’ve concluded that he does indeed blame this country for 9/11, and for why these people wish to kill us. It came from the horse’s mouth. Other people trying to spin what he meant is meaningless to me.
The rabid hatred about all things Ron Paul with a few of these guys, I doubt they can even read at that level when discussing/reading about him.
You apparently cannot tell the difference between pointing out something that can give rise to a breeding ground for terrorism and actually saying America deserved 9/11. But w/e, I’m not sure why you or any of the other Anti-Paulers bother so much, he has NO chance of getting elected President and even if he did, I’d be the first to admit his weakest part would be his abilities as Commander in Chief.
I cannot believe you would write this to another person on this forum. What a truly sick thing to say about someone's son.
Just not to me...and I wasn't even posting to you. Hmmmmm...wonder why that is? As if I don't know. ROFL!
That's a distinction without a difference, and he's not right. He's ill.
“Your post must be a mistake because you are hurling insults after you accused another freeper of doing the same thing on this thread. What gives hypocrite? “
It was an observation, since you clearly couldn’t follow his line of reasoning, which wasn’t that complex.
Either that, or you purposefully misrepresented it.
“Paul did equate the deaths on 9/11 to automobile deaths. There is no such rational comparison except to Paul and his moronic minions.”
He did not equate them. He noted that auto accidents kill more Americans than terrorists have.
A totally true statement.
Good to see them proving they’re the nutballs they are.
“Just not to me...and I wasn’t even posting to you. Hmmmmm...wonder why that is? As if I don’t know. ROFL!”
If people only posted to other people who posted to them, no one would post to each other.
Did you watch the video yet?
Can you point out the minutes and seconds where you can see any missile hurled, or where one curse word was uttered, as the post claimed?
Nonsense, it is different. Example, we had good reason to help Kuwait against Saddam. However, the fact that we went there in the first place is something that the radicals in SA, Iran and Iraq can point to the young and easily influenced radicals as "Western interference and war on Muslim world." The radicals are nuts of course but they are radical religious fanatics. If we just for no reason bombed Jordan tomorrow, and Jordan responded with 9-11, then Paul would claim that we deserved it. There is a huge difference and I'm sorry you are not able to see that.
“Regardless, that makes your son a traitor and he, like all other traitors, ought to burn in hell.”
This is disgusting.
I have yet to see one of the people on this thread who Paul nuts and his supporters violent kooks, condemn it.
But so true!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.