Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are Luntz's focus groups stacked for Romney?
Blogs for Fred Thompson ^ | January 7, 2008 | FredFaninKansas

Posted on 01/07/2008 12:59:04 AM PST by MitchellC

I post this question not as sour grapes but just as an observation. It seems like every time I watch one of these debates and FoxNews has one of its focus groups, the room goes from all undecided to almost ALL Romney. And something about it doesn't pass the smell test.

The reason is because the voters go from apparently undecided to making very strong statements in favor of Romney. And that's not to say Romney hasn't done well in these formats, but if you look at neutral observers on the net, the results are much more balanced. It also doesn't stand to reason that a room of supposedly undecided voters would be making such strong statements, particularly statements that seem to go right in line with Romney's campaign themes -- business experience, leadership, etc. They rarely talk about flip flops or anything like that, and are almost always critical of the other people.

Also, I have read that those interested in signing up for Luntz's focus groups do so online at his website. Given Romney's on the ground organization in both Iowa and New Hampshire, it would make sense he would have some of his supporters signing up for Luntz's focus groups, pretending to be undecided.

A case in point, someone on Fred08.com pointed out a guy who was at both tonight's focus group and one four months ago -- apparently undecided:
--------

Comment by Christopher Fischahs (248)
2008-01-07 01:28:18
http://roobaroo.net/Images/Fox_Focus_Group.jpg

Just one of many examples of people making re-appearences in Frank’s ‘undecided voter’ focus groups. The fact of the matter is that to get in these groups you sign up through his website. Most real undecided voters would never be paying any attention to something like that. The fact is people sign up for these groups already backing a candidate, mostly hoping to influence the debate.

I’m not saying everybody there was corrupted or dishonest, but some of them must have been. I doubt it was coordinated or anything, and I agree that Romney came out on top tonight, but the focus group is bs.
----

Finally, some of their anti-Fred answers seemed WAY too canned. "He needs to wake up". "He's an actor". Things like this. Remember the guy from Iowa who said "he looks tired" who was ALSO pro-Romney?

Maybe I'm just too pro-Fred but I think that Romney is stacking the focus groups.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: frankluntz; luntz; nh2008; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last
To: MitchellC

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

Romney did well in yesterday’s debate, its not a ‘conspiracy’.


61 posted on 01/07/2008 5:32:23 AM PST by Badeye (No thanks, Huck, I'm not whitewashing the fence for you this election cycle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought
I believe he came across very well in both the Saturday ABC debate and in last night's debate. I watched them both.

Out of our field of candidates, I am beginning to believe that Mitt may be the only one who can win. I'm not seeing Fred get any traction and he's not breaking out at these debates (with what little time he has to "shine").

I'm not saying I like all of Mitt's positions (let alone the fact that they change!), just being realistic in my analysis (FWIW) of the election at this point.

I don't think any of the other RINOs could beat Hillary or Obama.

62 posted on 01/07/2008 5:34:31 AM PST by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
I found this picture from 1987 at CPAC. Frank was attending Oxford and took time off to attend the Conservative Political Action Conference.

Photobucket

63 posted on 01/07/2008 5:35:25 AM PST by AdvisorB ("A Hillary Clinton presidency would result in a weaker economy and a weaker America" Dick Morris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: AmericanVictory

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1947234/posts


64 posted on 01/07/2008 5:37:31 AM PST by barryg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SW6906

Other then Bush 41, who was mainly considered a Texan, who was the last Republican President from the northeast?


65 posted on 01/07/2008 5:53:00 AM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ
Somebody said in 2004 that all undecided voters are democrats that republicans have to convince them to vote republican.
66 posted on 01/07/2008 5:54:07 AM PST by McGruff (A "Big Time" Fred Thompson supporter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

These are the things you run into when you have the highest negatives of any Republican.


67 posted on 01/07/2008 6:09:06 AM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

Once again, idle speculation which during the thread becomes hard fact here on FR. You think it might have happened, therefore it did. The word sleaze gets thrown around but the majority of what many Freepers regard as sleazy tactics are entirely based upon such speculation represented as fact. Until this campaign, I thought only the lib nutters were the only ones afflicted with this disease but I can see now it is spreading. That’s the real sleaze here.


68 posted on 01/07/2008 6:21:33 AM PST by Reaganesque (Charter Member of the Romney FR Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

“Past performance does not indicate future results”.


69 posted on 01/07/2008 6:22:59 AM PST by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

Or how about: when is the last time a Senator was elected President?


70 posted on 01/07/2008 6:25:42 AM PST by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC
I watched the debate and then tried to rank the winners and losers before all the talking heads started spinning.

I thought that Romney and Rudy were 1&2 and Thompson was last, (which was disappointing because Fred's the best conservative.) My 'take' was pretty much mirrored by Luntz's group. And I'm not a Romney supporter (at least I wasn't prior to the debate).

71 posted on 01/07/2008 6:28:32 AM PST by JPJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

I wish I could remember... perhaps the FReeper that was there will find this thread. It was in a live thread on an Iowa debate about 3 or 4 weeks ago. I had several exchanges in that thread with the FReeper I referenced.

LLS


72 posted on 01/07/2008 6:28:32 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims and vote Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

NH is a yankee state: Mitt is a Yankee


73 posted on 01/07/2008 6:30:13 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Moveon is not us...... Moveon is the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Court Watcher
More McCain Flip Flopping Click below to read inform yourself.

Parroting Romney talking points.

Welcome to FR.

Posting history: "I liked McCain until I learned he was evil! Now I support Romney, he's great. I used to hate Romney because of his flip flops. Now I realize that I can truly believe in him! Go Mitt! I used to support Fred Thompson until his poll numbers were bad and he got old. Now I support Mitt, he's great!"

Yikes....

74 posted on 01/07/2008 6:41:41 AM PST by JohnnyZ ("When we say I saw the PATRIOTS win the WORLD SERIES, it doesn't necessarily mean ...." - Mitt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

Any campaign [sleaze or not] that is worth their salt may try to get a few people in the focus group but I doubt they all did. Example would be Thompson’s and maybe Giuliani’s as they are concentrating on NH.

Conspiracies don’t lurk around every door. Sometimes things are just what they are.... Romney did well last night and that was his objective. I would have preferred to have seen Thompson shine better but he didn’t, imo. Some days you’re on and somedays you’re not.

In any case at midnight tonight Dixville Notch and Hart’s Location will begin the primary selection process in NH...
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/

Laissez les bons temps rouler


75 posted on 01/07/2008 7:12:37 AM PST by deport (31 days Super Tuesday -- [ Meanwhile:-- Cue Spooky Music--])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Once again, idle speculation which during the thread becomes hard fact here on FR. You think it might have happened, therefore it did.

I'm not representing this as anything beyond speculation.

Let me speculate in a little more detail. What probably happened was, Luntz allows 'undecideds' to seek him out to get into the groups, someone in the Mitt camp knew about it and nudged some faithfuls in that direction, they got into the groups and swayed a number of others.

You're naive if you think Mitt's camp wouldn't involve themselves in something like that, given they're involved with the guy who did push polling against McCain in 2000 and that Bob Novak stated as a matter of fact that the 'Fred will drop out' lie was traced back to Mitt's camp.

Or maybe all of these things are part of a big conspiracy by every other candidate's campaign against Mitt. Yeah, that's the ticket.

76 posted on 01/07/2008 10:32:22 AM PST by MitchellC (FILL THE TANK ON FRED'S PICKUP - Fred08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: barryg

Thank You, very disturbing.


77 posted on 01/07/2008 11:56:39 AM PST by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: barryg

Thank You, very disturbing.


78 posted on 01/07/2008 11:57:00 AM PST by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson