Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists say asteroid may hit Mars in late January (1 in 75 chance on Jan. 30, 2008)
ap on Examiner.com ^ | 12/20/07 | Alicia Chang - ap

Posted on 12/20/2007 6:27:00 PM PST by NormsRevenge

LOS ANGELES (Map, News) - Mars could be in for an asteroid hit.

A newly discovered hunk of space rock has a 1 in 75 chance of slamming into the Red Planet on Jan. 30, scientists said Thursday.

"These odds are extremely unusual. We frequently work with really long odds when we track ... threatening asteroids," said Steve Chesley, an astronomer with the Near Earth Object Program at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

The asteroid, known as 2007 WD5, was discovered in late November and is similar in size to the Tunguska object that hit remote central Siberia in 1908, unleashing energy equivalent to a 15-megaton nuclear bomb that wiped out 60 million trees.

Scientists tracking the asteroid, which is halfway to Mars, initially put the odds of impact at 1 in 350 and increased the chances this week after analyzing the data. Scientists expect the odds to diminish again early next month after getting new observations of the asteroid's orbit, Chesley said.

"We know that it's going to fly by Mars and most likely going to miss, but there's a possibility of an impact," he said.

If the asteroid does smash into Mars, it'll likely aim near the equator close to where the rover Opportunity has been exploring the Martian plains since 2004. The robot is not in danger because it lies outside the impact zone. Speeding at 8 miles a second, a collision would carve a hole the size of the famed Meteor Crater in Arizona.

In 2004, fragments of the comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 smacked into Jupiter, creating a series of overlapping fireballs in space. Astronomers have yet to witness an asteroid impact with another planet.

"Unlike an Earth impact, we're not afraid, but we're excited," Chesley said.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2008; asteroid; catastrophism; mars; scientists; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: Junior_G; kAcknor; NormsRevenge
> If they can't even say it will hit (75 to one?) how can they possibly say the rover is outside the impact zone if it does?

I presume that the "impact zone" is the half of the planet facing where the asteroid is coming from, at the time the asteroid approaches the planet.

So I then presume they mean the rover will be on the back (far) side of the planet when the asteroid will either a) hit the planet, or b) pass by it.

It's relatively easy to predict the date and time the asteroid will be at the planet, and the rotational position of the planet at that date and time. But the actual trajectory of the asteroid (i.e. whether it will hit the planet) is a LOT tougher to predict.

21 posted on 12/20/2007 8:07:25 PM PST by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Isn’t that the Vice President’s birthday?


22 posted on 12/20/2007 8:11:29 PM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast ( "Do well, but remember to do good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
If they can't even say it will hit (75 to one?) how can they possibly say the rover is outside the impact zone if it does?

However, that was a very good point and NASA is loosing their credibility.

23 posted on 12/20/2007 8:12:41 PM PST by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

When I first read the article I immediately thought of a Youtube shooting range video where the bullet hit a rock downrange and came back and plopped the shooter on the head. Ricochets can happen.


24 posted on 12/20/2007 8:12:52 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The sky is falling........ but on Mars! :-)


25 posted on 12/20/2007 8:14:18 PM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Ah, well we recently had Shoemaker-Levy crash into Jupiter, now this *may* happen to Mars, and yet, we are ASSURED that there is NO CHANCE anything like that could happen to the Earth.

Kinda like both neighors on your block winning the Lotto in the same week.

Sings in the Heavens anyone?


26 posted on 12/20/2007 8:15:31 PM PST by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bender2
"When it does happen, I hope my kinfolk are on the Moon, Mars..."

Huh? LOL

27 posted on 12/20/2007 8:21:35 PM PST by verity ("Lord, what fools these mortals be!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

They just discovered this and it might hit in January. Reminds me that (either Shoemaker or Levy) said it is likely we will not spot an Earth threatening asteroid until after it enters our atmosphere.


28 posted on 12/20/2007 8:30:30 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

"Where's the Ka-Boom?"

29 posted on 12/20/2007 8:32:09 PM PST by dfwgator (11+7+15=3 Heismans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Scientists tracking the asteroid, which is halfway to Mars,

Halfway from where?

30 posted on 12/20/2007 8:56:29 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunble
>> If they can't even say it will hit (75 to one?) how can they possibly say the rover is outside the impact zone if it does?

> However, that was a very good point and NASA is loosing their credibility.

No, it's not a good point. I think you misunderstood what I wrote.

The largest possible "impact zone" is the half of the planet facing the asteroid as it approaches the planet. By definition.

If the rover is on the OTHER side of the planet, it is "outside the impact zone".

So regardless of whether the asteroid hits the planet or not, if the rover is on the other side of the planet, the rover is safe.

31 posted on 12/20/2007 9:02:25 PM PST by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; RadioAstronomer; sionnsar; cogitator
OK, I’ve got a hard spot with this:

They assign a 1 in 75 chance of the asteroid hitting Mars - which is fine, orbital uncertainties in a multi-body calculation are a given even this close to a (potential) impact date.

Then the writer claims that the on-ground Mars camera is “outside the impact zone” (of the crater). If they aren’t sure of any impact at all, how can they claim that any given spot below is away from the zone?

Are they placing it in an alternate hemisphere (possible north pole impact while the camera is at the equator?) Other side of the planet (day impact side/night lander side ?)

Neither case is implied.

Let us hope that the impact is on our visible side, and that the orbital cameras are usable that direction.

32 posted on 12/20/2007 9:04:04 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kAcknor
If they can't even say it will hit (75 to one?) how can they possibly say the rover is outside the impact zone if it does? I mean, the odds are good that it is, since the 'zone' is currently larger than the entire planet, but come on.

You're thinking only of the spacial dimension. Think time as well. They know the plane of the orbit pretty well I would imagine, but can't quite tell if Mars will be there when the object crosses Mars' orbit. But if it is, I imagine they can tell where the uncertainly in the orbit would cut across Mars, in latitude anyway.

33 posted on 12/20/2007 9:07:00 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mr_Moonlight

Damn, beat me to it..


34 posted on 12/20/2007 9:07:17 PM PST by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer; NormsRevenge; theDentist; hobbes1; NeoCaveman; EODGUY; Cyber Liberty
If it misses, we should seriously study the feasibility of being able to push it into a collision. That would create a bunch of tech, and scientific knowledge. And it would totally rock.

Well, technically speaking, it might only partially rock. Some asteroids are mostly iron.

Better steel yourself for the collision if you stear us wrong, lest we cow in fear and dread of the impact.

Speaking of which, would the EPA require an environmental impact statement for this crater?

35 posted on 12/20/2007 9:10:24 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
You're thinking only of the spacial dimension. Think time as well

Realized that as I thought about it more. The speed of the object is easer to pinpoint than the trajectory. Knowning that it will pass by at a certain time isn't the same as knowing exactly where it will pass.

Far easier to tell where the bullet is going from behind it. When it's passing in front of you the destination is a bit harder to figure out.

36 posted on 12/20/2007 9:53:45 PM PST by kAcknor ("A pistol! Are you expecting trouble sir?" "No miss, were I expecting trouble I'd have a rifle.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Here is the orbit viewer (recommend centering on Mars and then zooming in):

http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=2007%20WD5;orb=1;cov=0;log=0#orb


37 posted on 12/20/2007 9:57:48 PM PST by burzum (None shall see me, though my battlecry may give me away -Minsc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The asteroid, known as 2007 WD5, was discovered in late November and is similar in size to the Tunguska object that hit remote central Siberia in 1908, unleashing energy equivalent to a 15-megaton nuclear bomb that wiped out 60 million trees.

Nobody really knows the size of the Tunguska object and wasn't it actually supposed to have been in the 3-5 megaton range?
38 posted on 12/20/2007 9:58:54 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

not sure.. there was a recent report or study that said it was possibly a 60 meter wide object, nobody knows for sure,, it also made light of a lot of the forest being diseased so it may have been more easily blown away .. one of those mysteries that is hanging tough.

it may have been shockwaves preceding the thing that actually did the damage and the object itself pretty much went poof as it flew thru the atmosphere.. thus not much to find physically..


39 posted on 12/20/2007 10:03:36 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: BereanBrain
Ah, well we recently had Shoemaker-Levy crash into Jupiter, now this *may* happen to Mars, and yet, we are ASSURED that there is NO CHANCE anything like that could happen to the Earth.

Jupiter is a lot different than the Earth. Almost anything that Jupiter reacts with will most likely be scattered out of the Solar System or it will impact Jupiter. Many objects that would safely fly by the Earth at a great distance would be pulled into Jupiter.

I know you often see the movies showing New York being hit by meteors and ice hurricanes and Los Angeles being hit by 10.0 earthquakes and volcanoes. This doesn't mean that these events are probable. Impact events are rare. The probability that humanity is going to be annihilated in the next 50 years is infinitesimal. The probability that Hollywood will make movies about meteors striking major American cities is one.

40 posted on 12/20/2007 10:18:57 PM PST by burzum (None shall see me, though my battlecry may give me away -Minsc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson