Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dayglored
If they can't even say it will hit (75 to one?) how can they possibly say the rover is outside the impact zone if it does?

However, that was a very good point and NASA is loosing their credibility.

23 posted on 12/20/2007 8:12:41 PM PST by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Hunble
>> If they can't even say it will hit (75 to one?) how can they possibly say the rover is outside the impact zone if it does?

> However, that was a very good point and NASA is loosing their credibility.

No, it's not a good point. I think you misunderstood what I wrote.

The largest possible "impact zone" is the half of the planet facing the asteroid as it approaches the planet. By definition.

If the rover is on the OTHER side of the planet, it is "outside the impact zone".

So regardless of whether the asteroid hits the planet or not, if the rover is on the other side of the planet, the rover is safe.

31 posted on 12/20/2007 9:02:25 PM PST by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson