Skip to comments.
How America Lost the War on Drugs
Rolling Stone ^
| Novermber 27th, 2007
| Ben Wallace-Wells
Posted on 12/02/2007 7:00:11 PM PST by cryptical
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-128 next last
Nice article, it really lays out the timeline and problems well.
1
posted on
12/02/2007 7:00:22 PM PST
by
cryptical
To: cryptical
The only thing that has really worked in the war on drugs has been a private initiative. The introduction of pre-employment drug screening has broken the main stream cultural acceptance of recreational drug use.
2
posted on
12/02/2007 7:07:14 PM PST
by
antinomian
(Show me a robber baron and I'll show you a pocket full of senators.)
To: cryptical
3
posted on
12/02/2007 7:07:48 PM PST
by
RDTF
("Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear - not absence of fear". Mark Twain)
To: cryptical
some conservatives, including Republican senators Jeff Sessions and Sam Brownback, have begun to question the logic of mandatory-minimum sentences. [snip]
'We're never going to crack this problem without a real demand-reduction program.'
So, let's stop punishing drug users with mandatory-minimum sentences, and let's also try to come up with some way to reduce the number of people out on the street using these drugs.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm. This could be challenging.
4
posted on
12/02/2007 7:08:31 PM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
To: cryptical
Control the border and you’ll stop a lot of drugs from coming in.
5
posted on
12/02/2007 7:09:04 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
To: cryptical
Coleman and other agents began to work deductively, backward. "We had always wondered why his guys, when we caught them, would always go to trial and risk lots of jail time, even when they would have saved themselves a lot of time if they'd just plead guilty," he says. "What we realized when we saw those binders was that they were doing a job. Their job was to stay on trial and have their lawyers use discovery to get all the information on DEA operations they could. Then they'd send copies back to Medellín, and Escobar would put it all together and figure out who we had tracking him."
6
posted on
12/02/2007 7:10:36 PM PST
by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: cripplecreek
7
posted on
12/02/2007 7:10:48 PM PST
by
Pinkbell
(Duncan Hunter 2008 - Protecting and Restoring America)
To: cryptical
I wonder if there will be any correlation between the pro-recreational drug fans and Paul fans here.
I’ll check back later for the results. :-)
8
posted on
12/02/2007 7:11:44 PM PST
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: cryptical
Any business requires two things: supply and demand. Demand dries up, the seller goes bankrupt.
My sister and her shack-up stud were both addicts. They have never shaken the habit completely. Both are on SSI. We the taxpayer pay for these two miserable excuses for human beings.
I’ve come to the conclusion that the only way to eliminate the drug trade is to eliminate the demand, literally.
Addicts get two chances to clean up. The first is kindly, the second is harsh. The third time they are arrested it is a capital offence crime.
Kill the demand, cure the supply.
9
posted on
12/02/2007 7:13:09 PM PST
by
SatinDoll
To: cryptical
A hundred and thirty years ago there were no drug laws in America and no meaningful drug problems. Nobody should need to be Albert Einstein to figure it out.
To: damondonion
I'd love to return to a world in which food, housing and medical care were only available to those who could work and support themselves. In a world like that, drug addicts die quickly, and pose much less of a social problem.
Sadly, our current society has mechanisms in place that allow a drug addict to survive for decades, committing crime after crime after crime.
11
posted on
12/02/2007 7:21:47 PM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
To: SatinDoll
hmm..so if your sister didnt reform..kill her! Is that your position? Should we extend that to smokers, or maybe chocolate lovers??after all those are sddictions also.
To: cryptical
Americans have always loved their drugs. We love them more than ever. The more prescribed, the better. Supposedly.
13
posted on
12/02/2007 7:25:25 PM PST
by
Leisler
(RNC, RINO National Committee. Always was, always will be.)
To: ClearCase_guy
Yep. When you remove the consequences for stupid behaviour, it continues. When you subsidise it, it flourishes.
14
posted on
12/02/2007 7:26:37 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: cryptical
“America” lost the war on drugs for the same reason it loses the war on gangs, war on crime and every war on anything else. The very agencies funded to ‘win’ the war have discovered it’s in their best interest to keep all the wars going for ever.
15
posted on
12/02/2007 7:30:35 PM PST
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: cryptical
1) Pretending Drugs are no worse for society than booze.
2) Pretending that adding to the number of choices of poisons doesn’t hurt society.
3) Corrupt Judges and Law Enforcement officials.
4) Lack of border security.
16
posted on
12/02/2007 7:32:41 PM PST
by
G Larry
(HILLARY CARE = DYING IN LINE!)
To: cryptical
The War on Drugs has contributed immensely to the economy over the years. The most rewarded sectors have been: Construction, legal, federal government, state government and pharmaceutical. Of course this has been to the detriment of the taxpayer, civil liberties and many, many families.
17
posted on
12/02/2007 7:33:15 PM PST
by
DemEater
To: SatinDoll
Kill the demand, cure the supply. Declare open season on every known drug pusher and the people will eliminate the supply in 10 days
18
posted on
12/02/2007 7:33:48 PM PST
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: paul51
They had open season on Escobar, and shot him in the back, and here we are, decades later...
19
posted on
12/02/2007 7:39:29 PM PST
by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: mvpel
there is a difference between Columbia and the US
20
posted on
12/02/2007 7:42:58 PM PST
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-128 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson