Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pat Robertson endorses Giuliani
The Politico ^ | November 7, 2007 | Mike Allen

Posted on 11/07/2007 5:51:19 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia

Pat Robertson, one of the nation's most influential Christian leaders, plans to endorse former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani today, the Politico has learned.

Giuliani has struggled to win support of social conservatives because of his moderate views on abortion and gay rights. But now he has one of the most resonant imprimaturs with Christian voters.

Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.), meanwhile, plans to announce his surprise endorsement of former Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) for president on Wednesday, a campaign official told Politico.

The endorsement is to be announced in Dubuque, Iowa.

The alliance gives McCain — once a front-runner, now struggling — a crucial bridge to social conservatives, an important constituency that has remained suspicious of him despite his opposition to abortion.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 2008endorsements; abortion; christianvote; giuliani; liberalrepublicans; patrobertson; prolife; rinorudy; rinostampede; rudy; rudygiuliani; scarletwhore; sellout
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 361-367 next last
To: calcowgirl

Exactly — war profiteering.


261 posted on 11/07/2007 1:14:04 PM PST by ellery (I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: rintense
The more troubling thing is that there are better candidates, better conservative candidates, than Rudy. Yet some ‘conservatives’ here would rather throw their support behind him now.

There is an element in the Republican Party that has an agenda that is pretty much limited to eliminating or reducing tax rates on capital gains and dividends. Why? Because some of these folks don't have to work for a living and receive nearly all of their income from capital gains and dividends and those that do work still receive much or most of their income from capital gains and dividends.

Many of these people don't have strong feelings one way or another about abortion, gay marriage or guns. They pay lip service to those issues only in order to gain the support of social conservatives who do care about those issues.

Rudy has promised these people that he will be their advocate as president. He has promised that he will make it his top priority to eliminate or reduce tax rates on capital gains and dividends. That is all these folks want to hear.

Who are these people? These are the Log Cabin Country Club for Growth poofs that I was talking about. They tolerate Rudy's "wide stance" on all of the social issues because, frankly, they don't care about any those issues. That wing of the party has always has always been the weak sister wing of the party. You won't find many military veterans among them. They aren't interested in any of the real conservative candidates because they have got it in their head that "Rudy's a winner" - hey, if his "wide stance" doesn't bother them, why should it bother anyone else?

If they succeed in nominating Rudy, they're going to destroy the Republican Party.

262 posted on 11/07/2007 1:14:59 PM PST by tear gas (Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia; wagglebee; All
I have taken a lot of heat for defending Pat Robertson in the past. I am done defending him. -— He has sold his soul, and he wouldn’t even wait until the General Election to do it. There is no principle left in the man; he is corrupted, perhaps beyond repair.

Shame on you, Pat Roberston, shame on you!

I would like to take this post to apologize for any prior statements I have made in defense of Pat Robertson. I am sorry, I was wrong. He is not the man of principle I thought him to be, he is an opportunist who would sell out anything for Political Power. Like Esau trading his inheritance for one meal, Pat Roberston has traded everything for one election. May he henceforth be remembered in the same way Esau is. That is how I will remember him.

Pat Roberston, I have lost all respect for you. And that is coming from someone who once had a LOT of respect for you. May you lose your meal AND your inheritance.

I will come to Pat Robertson’s defense no more. I am ashamed to admit that I ever have.

263 posted on 11/07/2007 1:16:50 PM PST by TitansAFC ("My 80% enemy is not my 20% friend" -- Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Pat Robertson has been nothing but a globalist shill; a pied piper of tyranny. The Mammon Man.


264 posted on 11/07/2007 1:17:12 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

... and with simple strokes of the keyboard, Ol’ Sparky becomes the arbiter of who and what is a RINO.

BTW, just to clarify the meaning: “Republican In Name Only” is an ostensible registered Republican who, when it comes down to it, refuses to vote for the REPUBLICAN nominee. Hence the qualifying term, “In Name Only”.


265 posted on 11/07/2007 1:21:28 PM PST by aligncare (no sarc tag necessary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Jmouse007

Rudy = Hillary.

He gave her the senate seat; if elected he’ll show us how conservative she is, but I’m sure that he’ll just pull a Bob Dole.


266 posted on 11/07/2007 1:28:09 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: aligncare
BTW, just to clarify the meaning: “Republican In Name Only” is an ostensible registered Republican who, when it comes down to it, refuses to vote for the REPUBLICAN nominee.

You have no clue. You're trying to say a RINO is anyone who isn't a sheep.

A “Republican In Name Only” is, quite obviously, someone who calls himself a Republican while espousing a wide array of positions in opposition to the Republican Party platform.

267 posted on 11/07/2007 1:30:12 PM PST by JohnnyZ (Romney : "not really trying to define what is technically amnesty. I'll let the lawyers decide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: aligncare
My carry permit in the state of New York was not affected in the least after 8 years of Giuliani as mayor.

Rudy's hands would be reasonably clean on the gun issue if he'd stuck to enforcing the city ordinances that were on the books long before he took office. However, his lawsuit against firearm manufacturers is what most pro-gun voters remember... the first evidence that his anti-gun ambitions stretched well beyond New York City.

Also, are you familiar with the agreement that Smith & Wesson signed with the government? The one that exposes any S&W retailer to increased federal meddling with regard to the types and/or other brands guns that said gun shops may offer for sale, and more... ever heard of that? It's currently dormant, unenforced because the Bush administration has chosen not to press the issue. A Giuliani administration would revive it in a heartbeat - it's right up Rudy's authoritarian alley.

268 posted on 11/07/2007 1:32:06 PM PST by Charles Martel (The Tree of Liberty thirsts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: aligncare

No, RINO is a leftist that runs as a Republican, and when in office, acts like a liberal Dummacrap.

Example:
Rudy.


269 posted on 11/07/2007 1:32:54 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
Pat Robertson - hypocrite and sellout.

Robertson and Guilliani and co. have accomplished nothing except revealing their total hypocrisy for all the world to see. What a complete and utter turn-off. I am truly disgusted.

270 posted on 11/07/2007 1:35:36 PM PST by khnyny (Although prepared for martyrdom, I preferred that it be postponed. Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryLee1990; RandallFlagg; HHKrepublican_2
"Rudy has executive experience and I think that Robertson is betting that once Rudy is in office, he's not going to pull any liberal pranks. But he could be wrong...but at least Hillary won't be in the Oval Office, and that's what Robertson is banking on with Rudy - most likely to beat Hillary."

I'm trying to tell you that Rudy is in the race to throw the presidency to Hillary. He already did this once in the Senate race and will do it again. Wouldn't it be just *terrible* if his cancer came back and he had to withdraw *again* (after winning the Republican nomination)?

This only works because you can fool some people *all* of the time. That Hillary is even a 'serious' candidate is proof of that.

Wake up boys! Don't be so freakin stupid!

271 posted on 11/07/2007 1:38:50 PM PST by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ

Take a look at the Contract With America - the document widely credited with sweeping Republicans into power in 1994.

http://www.house.gov/house/Contract/CONTRACT.html

... there is not one mention of abortion in it.

So, I’m trying to understand your point in the context of this fact: that Americans are evenly divided over abortion, and that the contract with America gave Americans a rationale for voting for republicans. And it didn’t mention abortion or guns or gays.


272 posted on 11/07/2007 1:40:26 PM PST by aligncare (no sarc tag necessary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
Pat Robertson endorses Giuliani

I almost couldn't believe the headline when I read it.

273 posted on 11/07/2007 1:40:37 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aligncare; ElkGroveDan
“Republican In Name Only” is an ostensible registered Republican who, when it comes down to it, refuses to vote for the REPUBLICAN nominee. Hence the qualifying term, “In Name Only”.

"RINO" was adopted by California GOP grassroots in 1994 who wore RINO buttons to denounce Los Angeles Mayor Dick Riordan's leftist policies and his staff and commission appointments. It had nothing to do with support of other candidates.

274 posted on 11/07/2007 1:43:31 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
Depending on your beliefs either Satan is laughing or there is a rip in the space time continuum ...

Indeed, he is...Hell has frozen over!

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

275 posted on 11/07/2007 1:47:25 PM PST by rfp1234 (Mundus vult decipi: the world wants to be deceived. ---James Branch Cabell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234

And they are skating....


276 posted on 11/07/2007 1:48:22 PM PST by ejonesie22 (Real voters in real voting booths will elect FDT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: aligncare
Take a look at the Contract With America

Oh, have we moved on past your idiotic attempt to redefine "Republican in name only"??

So, I’m trying to understand your point in the context of this fact: that Americans are evenly divided over abortion

That has nothing to do with my post, although you do raise several more ignorant points. Apparently you are extra confused today.

277 posted on 11/07/2007 1:49:17 PM PST by JohnnyZ (Romney : "not really trying to define what is technically amnesty. I'll let the lawyers decide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: skr

Thank you skr!


278 posted on 11/07/2007 1:57:05 PM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Call me a pro-life zealot with a 1-track mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; ellery; TommyDale
“Giuliani very publicly, for maximum PR impact, ripped up a big Saudi check on behalf of 9/11 victims.....then very quietly, he turned around and accepted big Saudi checks when they were made out to Giuliani Partners.”

BACKGROUND The original Saudi check was made out to the "Twin Towers Fund" Rudy's special little "tax-exempt charity" to which he appointed to the Board of Directors Arnold Schwarzenegger and his then-mistress, Judith Nathan, Arnold used the tax-exempt funds to help him launch his profit-making movie, "Collateral Damage," with Rudy and his entourage joining in on the gala event.

Gosh, I just hope these revelations won't affect the voting blocs Rudy has worked so hard to win.

GIULIANI BANDWAGON BRANCHES OUT TO ISRAEL
By MAGGIE HABERMAN, NY Post, April 21, 2007

EXCERPT A group of Israelis has launched a grass-roots effort to get people living in the Jewish state who are eligible to vote in the United States to line up behind Rudy Giuliani, it was reported yesterday.

The group, Giuliani Supporters in Israel, was launched by Mordechai Twersky, a onetime candidate for state Assembly in The Bronx in the early 1990s, according the Jerusalem Post. Twersky has established a Web site, giulianisupportersinisrael.org, with background information including Giuliani's famed eviction of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat from a Lincoln Center concert in 1995. "I did this as a private personal initiative, as a proud American and Israeli citizen, and I am confident that it will catch on," Twersky told the paper.

He said the campaign hadn't set up his group, but that he's been in contact with Team Giuliani since he got started. Giuliani has historically been popular with Jewish voters, and took a hard pro-Israel line when he was in office. Giuliani's campaign didn't return The Post's calls for comment. In some past elections, planeloads of Israelis with American citizenship have flown to the United States to vote.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/04212007/news/nationalnews/giuliani_bandwagon_branches_out_to_israel_nationalnews_maggie_haberman.htm

279 posted on 11/07/2007 2:00:35 PM PST by Liz (Rooty's not getting my guns or the name of my hairdresser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Others seem to have expanded the meaning to refer to anyone who isn’t in 100 percent agreement with them.


280 posted on 11/07/2007 2:02:30 PM PST by aligncare (no sarc tag necessary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 361-367 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson