Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thompson Leads Giuliani While Clinton’s Lead over Obama Grows (Harris Poll)
Harris Interactive ^ | September 20, 2007

Posted on 09/20/2007 2:41:32 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 last
To: jmeagan

If this fairytale makes your day more power to you. But be advised that, that younger generation you speak of has been claimed by a lot of would be presidents only to find out that they are quite loud but don’t vote in large numbers. Us old buzzards however turn out in droves. Sorry!


101 posted on 09/20/2007 7:13:42 PM PDT by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

I won’t vote for that ticket, and there isn’t a stronger Thompson supporter around.


102 posted on 09/20/2007 9:39:40 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: jackieaxe
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
103 posted on 09/20/2007 9:43:18 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

that Fred sure doesn’t know how to campaign...stumbling all the way to a lead


104 posted on 09/20/2007 9:45:26 PM PDT by wardaddy (Pigpen lives!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Thank ypu for your vote and paticipation in shaping America’s future.
- President Clinton will send you her thanks.


105 posted on 09/21/2007 4:15:31 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

another “vote for rudy or we’re all gonna die” prognostication? fred doesn’t need rudy as a running mate to beat hillary.


106 posted on 09/21/2007 4:19:52 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Why don’t you go say that to Jim Robinson?

He says he won’t vote for Giuliani either.

I happen to think Giuliani would be worse for this country than the Hildebeast.


107 posted on 09/21/2007 6:49:24 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
If Thompson chooses a RINO as a VP then he himself ain't the "REAL DEAL" and we can expect no better than Hillary anyway. Besides, if Hillary were to win, I suspect the return of Jesus Christ would interrupt her term in office. I really think we're that close. I hope and pray that we are and would wish for it to happen this instant!
108 posted on 09/21/2007 7:05:51 AM PDT by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Because I wrote it to you.

JR has stated that he will not support rudy for POTUS not the VP so you are assuming facts not in evidence.

Personnaly, I will vote for Fred, but if I don’t pervail, I will vote for anyone but Hillary!

As far as your last statement you are wrong but don’t worry. American taxpayers will pay the bill.


109 posted on 09/21/2007 8:30:14 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
Hm. Well, thank you for your reply.

I do understand your sentiment but I have to make my decisions about the future course of America based on something else.

-bill

110 posted on 09/21/2007 8:32:38 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

No, Jim said he WOULD NOT VOTE FOR HIM.

I would assume that meant for any position.

I refuse to vote to put that creep so close to the Presidency.


111 posted on 09/21/2007 10:43:27 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
I have to make my decisions about the future course of America based on something else.

Agreed and that's what makes this country so great!

112 posted on 09/21/2007 12:44:16 PM PDT by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
If Mitt, Rudy or McLame are present on the ticket as a VP, then I think I'll still sit on my hands. Better the Devil you know wants to destroy you than the one who works from within.

I must agree with that. Furthermore, I don't think campaigning is the best way to beat her. It isn't a fair fight. (If it were, Hillary Clinton would not be IN it.)
The best way to beat her is to investigate her campaign financing practices, and collect enough evidence to prosecute her ass.

113 posted on 09/23/2007 10:50:41 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Write. Phone. Fax. Demand answers. Demand questions!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Agreed. If Giuliani is on the ticket, I go elsewhere.


114 posted on 10/06/2007 8:29:52 AM PDT by B Knotts (Tancredo '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
"Too bad Fred got into the race too late and lacks the fire in the belly to succeed...."

Just playing devils advocate here, and "fire in the belly" is a very vague and ambiguous term.

IF "fire in the belly" means he's not running around like that idiot Obama proposing a pile of new programs and blapheming every opponent he has on a daily basis..maybe we need some of that now.

Maybe Mr. & Mrs. America is damn tired of the legacy seekers out there, and just to slow down and get our country secure again, and back in shape.

Fred - if nothing else - has steadfast principles and is nobody's fool. He says what thinks and seems to stand buy it.

At this stage in America we don't need someone who is constantly "doing something" every day...we need some "UN-doing". We've got a zillion stupid laws and taxes on the books that need to be eradicated.

We need some more "speak softly and carry a big stick" on a domestic and foreign level.

Idiots like clinton slashed the military, destroyed missile silos and half of our air forces just to kiss the commies collective asses, and now we have now position of power from which to deal with third world dictators like Iran, etc.

Almost every argument I've heard again Thompson is from someone with Hunter, Rudy, etc in their tagline. Go figure.

You don't have to run around barking like a chiuhauha to make a good leader, sometimes run silent-run deep is the better tact.

I think he would handle the press better...sometimes the more you say, the more the press and the left have to demogogue you.

We don't need any more clintons [used car salesmen] in the White House, nor anymore legacy seekers and power merchants. What we need is someone who truly loves this country, and is looking out for generations to come.

If hillary gets in, you probably should get out the old swastika and sew it on your sleeve. Go ahead and tell your boss to start sending 75% of your pay to the feds (IF you have a job left), and buy one of those "Home Remedies" books, as going to the doctor will be akin to going to the DMV to get you tag renewed. The exam will take 5 minutes, but he government red tape could take days.

/rant off
115 posted on 10/06/2007 9:29:32 AM PDT by FrankR (Sean Hannity - king of the Rudybots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
Maybe Mr. & Mrs. America is damn tired of the legacy seekers out there, and just to slow down and get our country secure again, and back in shape.

You got that right. I remember back during the Clinton Administration, people would talk about the government doing this or that and spending Billions of Dollars to ensure Clinton's precious legacy as if that was a rational reason to do anything. Who really cares what people think of Bill Clinton in twenty or thirty years?

If a President wants to advocate some program to better the country, we can have a discussion. I think that nine times out of ten the proposals are wrong-headed and ultimately destructive, but that is a matter for policy debate. If the purpose of the program is just to make people feel better about a former President, how do you even argue with that? It is just so stupid, you realize that anybody advocating it has to be so far removed from reality that argument is futile.

We would do better selecting our President at random out of the phone book than we do by selecting from the group of people who want to be President so bad they will do anything to make it happen. These are the very last people you want in control of anything.

But given we are not going to start drawing names out of a hat anytime soon, you go for the guy who seems to have ambition balanced by humility, and who will not run over his mother to get into the White House. Fred Thompson is the pick of the litter, by that criteria.

116 posted on 10/06/2007 10:47:54 AM PDT by gridlock (C'mon people now / Smile on your Brother / Everybody get together / Try to love one anoth-kaBOOM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson