[SmithL]

[TexasRepublic]

I would not talk about any use of force," said Mohamed>

Considering the name, that I all I need to know.

[TornadoAlley3]

[ClearCase_guy]

Okay, so there is no "clear and present danger", so there is no need or justification for using force. Let's focus on diplomacy.

What's that? Iran has successfully tested a nuclear weapon? Well, that changes everything!! Obviously, talk of military action would be extremely foolish in light of these events. Let's focus on dipomacy.

The UN simply enables the worst tyrants in the world.

[RightWhale]

• There are rules on how to use force

  That's true. Type, timing, duration, location, direction, quality, and quantity are vitally important.

[RobinOfKingston]

"I would not talk about any use of force [against iran]," said Mohamed ElBaradei, ...

First, this is a muslim advising against the use of force against muslims.

Second, if your neighbor says he is acquiring a weapon with which to do you harm, prudence dictates you not let that happen.

iran is the only national entity that can prevent the "use of force" against iran.

[FlipWilson]

Quote: “Saying only the UN Security Council could authorize the use of force, ElBaradei urged the world to remember Iraq . . .”

Oh, you mean where the UN did not authorize force and we did anyway, sure we can remember that. I suppose that to the leftists, Iraq signals somehow that the UN and UN alone can authorize the use of force. I think they are in for a great deal of dissapointment.

[cweese]

“Saying only the UN Security Council could authorize the use of force”

Sure thing, Mo.

[DoughtyOne]

"I would not talk about any use of force," said Mohamed ElBaradei, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, in an indirect response to French warnings that the world had to be prepared for the possibility of war in the event that Iran obtains atomic weapons.

Saying only the UN Security Council could authorize the use of force, ElBaradei urged the world to remember Iraq before considering any similar action against Teheran.

Sit your punk ass down you idiot stick. It was someone in your postion years ago that said they were sure Hussein had WMDs, since he was not allowing inspectors full acesss. That person evaporated into the woodwork, as soon as people said Bush was lying.

What we do is none of your f'n business. As for Iran, we don't need to send in ground troops. We'll take out the political and military leadership as well as the nuke sites and terrorist training camps. Then we'll see who steps into the power vacuum and repeat if necessary.

You folks can't even get the nuclear issue settled, but think you've got the juevos to make an overall assessment. Bull s--t!

Go take a valium and let some men take over you wuse.

[Prince Caspian]

The chief UN nuclear inspector, Mohamed ElBaradei, criticized talk of attacking Iran as "hype" Monday, saying such options should only be considered as a last resort and only if authorized by the UN Security Council.

On the other hand, my plumber, Ray Stonebraker, thinks we should have taken out Iran at least two years ago.

[theDentist]

"...I would hope that everybody would have gotten the lesson after the Iraq situation, where 700,000 innocent civilians have lost their lives..."

700,000 now. My my my. That number grows like his bank account every time he opens his mouth.

[MD_Willington_1976]

That dude looks like an Arab Dr Phil....

[sure_fine]

” Saying only the UN Security Council could authorize the use of force, “

he still doesn’t GET IT, does he

[Convert from ECUSA]

Memo to El Baradei and the U-bloody-effing-N: Kindly go sit on an air hose, turn in on and rotate!

[Candor7]

Saddam Hussein, the President of Iraq, has warned the US about going to war with his country.
American President George W Bush has been talking for a while about attacking the Middle Eastern country of Iraq.

Saddam is thought to be one of the biggest enemies of the US. But in a speech on Iraqi TV, Saddam warned any attack on Iraq by the US would fail.

He said the only way to get peace is talk their differences through.

Weapons

Tension between the two countries started over 10 years ago, when Iraq invaded the State of Kuwait. The invasion started the Gulf War which Britain was involved in.

And after the 11 September attacks, the US said they would think about going to war with countries involved in terrorism. The US believe that includes Iraq.

They think Saddam is making dangerous chemical weapons and they don’t trust him not to use them.

In the past, Saddam made it really difficult for United Nations (UN) weapons inspectors to search Iraq. In the end they decided to leave.

But the British MP who deals with the Middle East said war could be avoided if Saddam decided to let weapons inspectors into his country.

[Inwoodian]

Rule out nothing. This twerp is a fox in the henhouse.

[monday]

Mohamed ElBaradei should just shut the F up. No one cares what he has to say. I say we strap him to the first bunker buster used to take out Iran’s nukes.

[seanrobins]

I would like to propose a new job for Mr. ElBaradei ... Do you remember the young (idiot) woman who went to the West Bank (or was it Gaza) and threw herself into the path of an oncoming Israeli tank, to save the poor palestinians and, well... was thereafter able to fit into a dress several sizes smaller...? Well, in the spirit of both her an the enviroNutCases who chain themselves to trees, and the like... I'd like to see ElBaradei put his principles (whatevertheyare) where his mouth is, and chain himself to an Iranian nuclear laboratory. I am ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN that Israel would never risk his safety by bombing the place.

[Beckwith]

ElBaradei is Muslim Brotherhood - - you can’t fool me!

[dennisw]

FU ya Muslim tool. Is anyone surprised this Muslim EL Baredi is Iran’s spokesman?

[LtKerst]

Mohamed ElBaradei, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency

What Help has this Retard been to US?

deep penetrating Bunker Busters, and Daisy cutters for the mullahs!