Posted on 09/17/2007 6:13:24 AM PDT by webschooner
BRUSSELS/LUXEMBOURG (Reuters) - Microsoft suffered a stunning defeat on Monday when a European Union court backed a European Commission ruling that the U.S. software giant illegally abused its market power to crush competitors.
The European Union's second-highest court dismissed the company's appeal on all substantive points of the 2004 antitrust ruling.
More importantly, it endorsed Commission sanctions against Microsoft's tying together of software and refusal to give rival makers of office servers information to enable their products to work smoothly with Windows, used by 95 percent of computers.
It annulled only the EU regulator's imposition of a Microsoft-funded independent trustee to monitor compliance.
"The Court of First Instance essentially upholds the Commission's decision finding that Microsoft abused its dominant position," a court statement said.
DOWNBEAT
Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith was downbeat in speaking to reporters at the courtroom, promising the company would obey the ruling in full. He said there was no decision yet on whether to appeal to the European Court of Justice.
"It is clearly very important to us as a company that we comply with our obligations under European law," Smith said. "We will study this decision carefully and if there additional steps we need to take in order to comply with it, we will take them."
Microsoft has used every recourse open to it in every case brought against it by governments and regulators.
The company has weathered a series of defeats in antitrust cases in the last decade and sees legal setbacks as almost part of its business model and a price for its near-monopoly.
Microsoft has already moved to new battlegrounds such as seeking acceptance of its technical standards across the industry, while continuing to bundle new features into its new Vista desktop software.
Rivals welcomed the EU court decision as a signal that authorities do not intend to allow Microsoft to pursue anti-competitive practices with impunity.
The Commission ordered the company to sell a version of Windows without the Windows Media Player application used for video and music, which few have bought, and to share information allowing rivals' office servers to work smoothly with Windows.
Microsoft has not demonstrated the existence of objective justification for the bundling, and ... the remedy imposed by the Commission is proportionate," the court statement said.
A spokesman for Microsoft opponents, the European Committee for Interoperable Systems, said the ruling confirmed Microsoft had abused its near-monopoly in computer operating systems and set ground rules for the company's behaviour.
"This decision establishes principles for the behaviour of this company. Microsoft should now finally comply with the Commission decision on operability," lawyer Thomas Vinje said.
Another winner was the Free Software Foundation, which makes free, open software for work group servers. "Microsoft can consider itself above the law no longer," said Georg Greve, president of the FSF Europe.
The judges ordered Microsoft to pay the costs of FSF and those of the software giant's business rivals, which had supported the Commission's case. By contrast, Microsoft's allies were forced to bear their own costs.
The Commission must pay 20 percent of its own costs and 20 percent of Microsoft's while Microsoft must pay 80 percent of its own costs and 80 percent of the Commission's.
The ruling was made by the 13-judge Grand Chamber of the Court of First Instance in Luxembourg, the first time such a matter has been broadcast on live television.
Since the original decision, the Commission has fined Microsoft a further 280.5 million euros, saying it had failed to comply with the interoperability sanction. The EU regulator is considering a further fine for non-compliance.
(additional reporting by Mark John in Luxembourg, Sabina Zawadzki and William Schomberg in Brussels)
Microsoft shares traded in Frankfurt were down 2 percent at 20.40 euros at 1021 GMT, underperforming the European technology index which was down 0.4 percent. About 15,000 shares had changed hands, roughly the 30-day average daily trading volume.
The court said Microsoft, the world's largest software maker, was unjustified in tying new applications to its Windows operating system in a way that harmed consumer choice.
The verdict, which may be appealed only on points of law and not of fact, could force Microsoft to change its business practices.
It also gives EU Competition Commission Neelie Kroes a green light to pursue other antitrust cases and complaints involving Microsoft, Intel, Qualcomm and Rambus, and to issue draft new antitrust guidelines that were put on ice pending the ruling.
"Microsoft must now comply fully with its legal obligations to desist from engaging in anti-competitive conduct. The Commission will do its utmost to ensure that Microsoft complies swiftly", Kroes said in a statement.
The court upheld a record 497 million euro ($689.9 million) fine imposed on the company as part of the original decision.
There's more than a few stragglers. I could show you recent logs where this accounts for several thousand messages an hour.
Please note thie part of my post "The days of spammers probing for legit address in the manner you described ended at least five years ago.". I did not say the days of bulk spammers is over I said they don't generally send from legit addresses loking to refine their list because now that practice is not just unethical but *illegal*.
How do you know that the address in the header of the spams you're getting were legit? did you try to test it? how do yo uknown they are probing for addresses or, as I said, just sending out to alphanumeric combinations of addresses.
If you're really getting hammered you could do the world a fovor by reporting the offending mail addresses to the RBL..
Basically, doing a DNS lookup was too costly. Legitimate mail was being delayed. The current rule is one recipient who has an actual account.
Pass that test and the message will be scanned for other kinds of spam. Fail it and into the bit bucket.
Meanwhile the monopoly OPEC says it’s “done enough” to meet world oil demand.
Ok, so lets step back and ask: then why did you seem to have a problem with the idea of mail servers being responsible for filtering? I though your complaint about legit mails with a typo in the to address was a problem?
Pass that test and the message will be scanned for other kinds of spam. Fail it and into the bit bucket.
Sounds like a boiler plate template of how it should be done..
And I thought I was the only one who thought DOS was wonderful. Bless you!
Yup. My email address, which I've had for over 10 years now is a three-letter acronym. I get spam from everyone on the planet. Good thing my forwarding service has excellent spam filtering.
Any particular reason why you're running as root to telnet to another host? :-)
In this thread I am copying from web pages and doing things myself...
Sudo is my friend and I seldom do anything as root ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.