Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: N3WBI3

Basically, doing a DNS lookup was too costly. Legitimate mail was being delayed. The current rule is one recipient who has an actual account.

Pass that test and the message will be scanned for other kinds of spam. Fail it and into the bit bucket.


143 posted on 09/18/2007 11:03:32 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
Basically, doing a DNS lookup was too costly. Legitimate mail was being delayed. The current rule is one recipient who has an actual account.

Ok, so lets step back and ask: then why did you seem to have a problem with the idea of mail servers being responsible for filtering? I though your complaint about legit mails with a typo in the to address was a problem?

Pass that test and the message will be scanned for other kinds of spam. Fail it and into the bit bucket.

Sounds like a boiler plate template of how it should be done..

145 posted on 09/18/2007 11:07:50 AM PDT by N3WBI3 (Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson