Posted on 08/30/2007 2:48:08 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
It’s not going to come true no matter how many times you repeat it.
Soledad O’Brien is practically salivating on CNN tonight!
lol
“But seriously, there’s no way any man or woman’s foot is going to reach over to the other stall unless they have Krusty the Clown-type feet.”
Maybe, maybe not...but Krusty Clown feet alone shouldn’t ruin this guy for life...doesn’t seem to be anymore here.
And at 42 minutes into Soledad’s show they just mentioned that Hillary gave 23K to charity that she received from a man wanted for fraud!
Now he's been promoted to pottie pervert patrol.
One has to wonder, was he such an eff-up at "cart enforcement" that he was given the toilet duty as punishment for allowing too many crushed kiddies and flattened old farts?
This whole story is becoming farcical.
Now he’s been promoted to pottie pervert patrol.
He’s really a rising star on the Minneapolis police force!
“Is it possible, after attending Wikipedia U to get a degree?? ;)”
Sure, I’ll write one up for you.
Just wrote an edit to cover my credentials.
I still can’t believe how many folks actually cite that as a source.
... I did the following: Engaged in conduct I knew or should have known tended to arouse alarm or resentment or others which conduct was physical rather than verbal in nature.He signed his name. Now he is in the position of saying his earlier sworn statement to the court was false. His guilty plea is at:
I understand that the court will not accept a plea of guilty from anyone who claims to be innocent.
I now make no claim that I am innocent of the charge to which I am entering a plea of guilty.
Something STINKS, and Freepers will find out the truth!
God Help Him!
I notice that there is no mention of lewd behavior under your definition of disorderly conduct.
It I read it correctly, he has also changed employers from Metropolitan airport police to Minneapolis Police Department. I assume they are different agencies.
"Engaged in conduct I knew or should have known tended to arouse alarm or resentment "
No mention of lewdness.
You are exactly right.
FR complying to the media's wishes...as usual.
How much news did that get? I would say this is MUCH worse offense than Larry Craig. Yet...
Democrats love to spout that any legal fight after he signed that statement would be an admission of purgery.
However, is you are forced to sign a legal statement under duress, is that actually purgery?
In these situations, I have altered my middle initial while signing my name to a "U" instead of the correct "R", to signify that I was signing my name under duress.
Yet you 100% assume Craig acted lewdly.
Sharpen those brains, boy.
I’d say so too, but then again, I’d have to add to it a number of other prominent dem names. Bubba aside, how about Sandy Berger stuffing classified documents in his shorts?
I’m too tired...the list is too long.
I notice that there is no mention of lewd behavior under your definition of disorderly conduct.It's not my definition. It's the statute's.
Yep...saw it.
He didn’t get charged for lewdness...that’s important. I personally would have had a lawyer. This guy figured that by taking the lesser charge of disorderly conduct, he’d keep it out of the papers. Still think this is weak...timing is suspect too.
“Craig later pleaded guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct.”
“I should have had the advice of counsel in resolving this matter. In hindsight, I should not have pled guilty. I was trying to handle this matter myself quickly and expeditiously.”
This was poor judgment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.