Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: what's up
[The charge was disorderly conduct...not lewdness]
 
I didn't say the charge was lewdness.    Aren't you getting low on straw?
 
This is what I quoted  (red emphasis added):

 "Craig later pleaded guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct."  
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1889089/posts?page=149#149
 
If you're having problems with your vision then you should visit an optomotrist.  
 
 
 
I think the charge of disorderly conduct gave the intended message:   "Get the hell out of here and don't pull this crap again in our town.".
 
I wonder if the Senators business card trick worked in the past.  He was obviously shocked that it didn't work this time.  Surprise.

249 posted on 08/30/2007 7:50:09 PM PDT by VxH (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: VxH
I didn't say the charge was lewdness.

Yet you 100% assume Craig acted lewdly.

Sharpen those brains, boy.

257 posted on 08/30/2007 7:59:14 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson