Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Principles of Freedom vs. Public/Private Partnerships-CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
www.canadafreepress.com/ ^ | August 15, 2007 | Tom DeWeese,

Posted on 08/19/2007 9:05:41 AM PDT by B4Ranch

Property Rights activist and ranger, Wayne Hage said, "Either you have the right to own property or you are property." The backbone of the plan was a call for "public/private partnerships."

Sustainable Development is not freedom. Not one of the three principles apply.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: agenda21; fairtrade; freetrade; kissinger; ngo; nwo; ppp; spp; tomdeweese
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-187 next last
To: Toddsterpatriot

By trying to appear intelligent, you constantly expose your childish stupidity.


61 posted on 08/20/2007 12:02:44 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Pointing out that the Supreme Court doesn’t pass laws makes me look stupid? That’s funny!
62 posted on 08/20/2007 12:06:42 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Arguing, as you are in this thread, by denying that courts MAKE CASE LAWS, which must be followed, subject to executive enforcement, exposes how you, once again, do nothing but attempt to appear intelligent. You are not intelligent, you are nothing but an empty-headed poster who posts for the sole purpose of quibbling over inanities.


63 posted on 08/20/2007 12:11:10 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Arguing, as you are in this thread, by denying that courts MAKE CASE LAWS

Were did I deny that?

you are nothing but an empty-headed poster

Takes one to know one.

quibbling over inanities.

Courts passing laws is an inanity? I thought it went right to our form of government.

64 posted on 08/20/2007 12:15:58 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

toady...give it up. You’ve already exposed your stupidity and immature childishness once again.

It’s obvious to all, except for yourself.

Those who pay you to post here should seek a refund; you’ve done nothing to further anything except solidify the fact that you’re a joke.


65 posted on 08/20/2007 12:18:37 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo; Calpernia

Re: bridge and privatising roads and bridges... OK... feeling the earth tipping on its axis... Sad that we can no longer even take accidents (or was it?) at face value - since our politicians will use any excuse they can to ram through their secret agendas.


66 posted on 08/20/2007 12:20:23 PM PDT by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
You’ve already exposed your stupidity and immature childishness once again.

By explaining that the Supreme Court passes no laws. Got it. Thanks for defending the guy who is ignorant of the way our government is set up. I'm sure he really appreciates you.

67 posted on 08/20/2007 12:21:49 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Borax Queen; Calpernia
our politicians will use any excuse they can to ram through their secret agendas

They count on the sheep to take everything at face value. It's those who don't that see exactly how they are ram-rodding through their agendas....then the politicos and the MSM, which is complicit with the NAU agenda, mock those who aren't sheep and can clearly see what it is they are doing....in incremental steps.

68 posted on 08/20/2007 12:22:50 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

No, toad.

One does not have to explicitly state CASE law to understand that the courts do, IN FACT, legislate from the bench.

There are NUMEROUS BOOKS which speak to the very problem with liberals, like you, who LEGISLATE FROM THE BENCH.

Now, pick up your marbles. You lost....again!


69 posted on 08/20/2007 12:24:47 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

I am glad I read the article, and followed some links. I joined FreeRepublic to learn more about what is happening to our country, (and meet some friendly aquaintences in the process.)

I am fairly new here, and I am sure learning a lot. I apologize for posting mistakes sometimes. I’ll try to be more careful.

:-)


70 posted on 08/20/2007 12:26:34 PM PDT by yorkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
There are NUMEROUS BOOKS which speak to the very problem with liberals, like you,

Wrong again, I'm a conservative.

who LEGISLATE FROM THE BENCH.

By passing case law. Got it. LOL!

71 posted on 08/20/2007 12:27:44 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: yorkie

You post no mistake. The courts are, indeed, creating laws, from the bench. And it has become a very real problem, as laws are only supposed to be made by legislators...not judges. But as activist judges are not following the Constitution, they are, indeed MAKING LAWS.


72 posted on 08/20/2007 12:28:43 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

YOU ARE NO CONSERVATIVE.


73 posted on 08/20/2007 12:29:00 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Oh sure. It looks cute and cuddly at first. But then you feed it and it follows you around peeing all over the place. Better to leave it where you found it.


74 posted on 08/20/2007 12:29:28 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

Yes I am.


75 posted on 08/20/2007 12:29:57 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo; yorkie
But as activist judges are not following the Constitution, they are, indeed MAKING LAWS.

BTTT

76 posted on 08/20/2007 12:30:22 PM PDT by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Toad, pick up your marbles. You lost...again.

Continue to quibble, as you are prone to do, impresses no one.

Refund the monies to whomever it is that pays you to continue to attack conservative, patriotic Americans at FR, at every turn.


77 posted on 08/20/2007 12:30:37 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

I’m not trying to impress idiots like you.


78 posted on 08/20/2007 12:31:15 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Oh no, I am spitting up my shigella carrot soup (laughing).


79 posted on 08/20/2007 12:31:44 PM PDT by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

*yawn*


80 posted on 08/20/2007 12:31:54 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson