Posted on 08/17/2007 10:46:03 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
This e-wire / report ultimately makes two points:
1. The voting process at the Iowa Straw Poll was a fraud, wrapped in lies. (Whenever those running any kind of an election use police power to hide all the ballots from the people, and then announce results (?) when supposedly (?) only they have seen the ballots – those people are frauds, are acting like Stalin-esque tyrants, and their organization is a fraud.
That award goes in our current drama to the Iowa GOP leadership, namely Ted Sporer, Chuck Laudner, Mary Tiffany, Craig Robinson, and Chairman Ray Hoffman. What they did to Ron Paul and all those who paid $35 to vote in the Iowa Straw Poll, and all those who entered into a contract with them by paying $35 to support the event, is UNCONSCIONABLE!
These KGB/GESTAPO TYPES, groveling before the sinister banking powers in NYC and behind the RNC and the DNC, -- and acting as their enforcers in Iowa -- hid all the EVIDENCE (the ballots) at the Iowa Straw Poll and announced the alleged results based on their assertion alone – which the rest of us are supposed to take and believe on blind faith!
I am joined by already thousands of others in saying: WE DON’T BELIEVE YOU! You hid the evidence! You have hidden the ballots – and now you have had time to switch the ballots! You fronted for crooks, thieves, enemies of America, enemies of honest people everywhere!
The US Supreme Court has ruled twice in the last one hundred years, in U.S v Mosley (1915) and Reynolds v Sims (1964), that our right to vote includes not only the right to cast a ballot, but the right to know that our vote was counted accurately.
There is only one reason to hide the ballots from press, from candidates, and from the people – because those so hiding the ballots want to keep open the option to cheat – to rig the election.
The evidence is the BALLOTS, which should have been kept in public view all day, and counted in the presence of ALL factions, before said ballots leave the public view.
LONGEST DELAY EVER
In 1995, when the “unbelievable” tie occurred between CFR favorites Senator Bob Dole and Senator Phil Graham – the doors were locked for two solid hours after the voting ended.
As I have said for years, only the GOP leadership was behind the locked doors in 1995, and all of them supported either Dole or Graham. The published “results” that year were that Buchanan, who by far got the best reception from the crowd, came in second with about 1950 – but that Dole and Graham “tied” for first place at exactly 2501 to 2501.
MANY people were not buying it, and Robert Novak of CNN suggested the next morning that the straw poll vote had been “cooked.” (By the way, Fred Smart interviewed a person on Saturday who also gave his witness from 1995 that only Dole and Graham people were behind the locked doors in the “counting” room in 1995.)
Our strong suspicion was that Buchanan came in first in 1995, but this result was unpalatable to the Neo-Cons running the GOP in NYC and D.C. So, the Dole and Graham people wanted to place Buchanan in second place, but neither would give way to the other on first place. Thus, the almost impossible tie was agreed upon.
This year of 2007 saw the longest delay EVER – 15 minutes loger than the 1995 delay. In 2007, the Ron Paul year, -- it was 2 hours and 15 minutes before the announcement came from the podium.
THE BEST HUNCH
While we are totally devoid of evidence (the ballots), the best analysis I’ve heard is this: that probably Dr. Paul came in second to Romney who spent hundreds of thousands of $$ to bus in people.
However, this result – Ron Paul coming in second place in the 2007 Iowa Straw Poll -- was totally unpalatable to the Iowa GOP and their NYC masters and D.C. handlers. Such a result would have shown both the GOP at the state and national level, and the 5 Big TV Networks – to be liars and falsifiers of evidence up until the Iowa Straw Poll.
The World Tyranny Ruling Elite needed Paul to appear to finish near the bottom so that they could ignore him completely on the mass media. Therefore, the suspicion is that Ron Paul’s vote was partially stolen and distributed to Huckabee, Brownback, and Romney. (Tancredo would not be helped by the Iowa GOP, despite his neo-con outlook on foreign affairs, because his anti-illegal immigration stance is completely unpalatable to the Ruling Elite in NYC and D.C. who dictate to the Iowa GOP, and all other state GOPs.)
As usual in computer-generated elections – everything came up smelling like roses for the Neo-con wirepullers behind the scenes of both parties.
THE AFFIDAVITS ARE ESSENTIAL! PLEASE HELP!
2. We need the affidavits of 1306+ Iowans who voted at the straw poll for Ron Paul – in order to prove, if such is the case, that the PUBLISHED count which the Iowa GOP announced was not accurate with regard to Ron Paul’s vote. (All who actually voted are welcome to submit affidavits.)
SOME DISTURBING NUMBERS
The comprehensive published “results” will be in a future report in this series -- view them online here:
http://blog.ronpaul2008.com/ron_paul_2008/2007/08/iowa-straw-poll.html
-- but at this point the reader may want to know that the Iowa GOP claims that Romney came in first with 4516 votes, and Ron Paul came in 5th with 1305 votes.
Hear ye! Hear ye! The Ron Paul Campaign has confirmed to callers what was repeated at the event itself -- that the campaign bought and gave away 800 tickets. The “Adopt an Iowan group” (an independent effort) has published that they had collected $22,500 and purchased 643 tickets. (By the way, since the “Adopt and Iowan” page won’t allow you to copy it, I have printed it out to preserve the documentation.)
So now we are being asked to believe that Ron Paul got less votes (1305) than the tickets purchased by the campaign and the “Adopt an Iowan” campaign (totally 1443) – and that NO ONE in Iowa came on their own to pay $35 and vote for Ron Paul !!!!!
The Ron Paul Campaign AND the Adopt an Iowan campaign kept track of who the tickets were given to (I hope). This is enough affidavits to prove that the announced Diebold “count” was wrong. – And we want to find as many other Iowa citizens as possible who paid $35 out of their own pocket to vote – so we can get their affidavits also.
This seems to be a smoking gun. This will be the greatest and most irrefutable proof ever that a Diebold computer was used to rig an election!
We need the affidavits of any Iowan who voted for Ron Paul at the Ames, Iowa Straw Poll. If we succeed – then we will have the proof that the Diebold computers at the Iowa Straw Poll of 2007 – were rigged.
If you voted in the Iowa Straw Poll on August 11, 2007 – and if you need an affidavit to make sure your vote counts, and especially if you want to help us prove whether or not the result published for Ron Paul was accurate – you can go to:
www.votefraud.org/iowa_straw_poll_2007_report_affidavit_part1.htm
At the top and bottom of that article is a link to the relevant affidavit. Simply right click on the link, use “Save target as” and save the word document to your computer where you can find it. You will then have an affidavit to fill out, and get notarized at a bank, Kinkos, etc., and to mail back to us.
A number of affidavits are already in hand.
End of this e-wire.
Jim Condit Jr.
Good point, I missed that servey...
So do you have a source that refutes the claims made in the article?
Sounds like you're doing the Paulitroll shuffle to me.
As long as I copy carefully, I can be assured my entry will be the most accurate information on the page.
He won't.
He'll continue to repeat the lie, hoping that no one calls him on it.
Watch his response carefully, there will be nothing but logical fallacies, term switching, and redefinition to suit his pre-determined view.
You ought to know better than to confuse these guys with facts.
So, in your mind, it only becomes a "slaughter" if 2,000,000 people or more are killed (or 1,500,000 if we round up)?
I am not surprised you support Ron Paul then.
Uh, no, you're the one misrepresenting facts. Taken from the WSJOpinionJournal: http://opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110010382
Here is what did happen:
In 1973, the U.S. withdrew its troops from Vietnam, as Mr. Kerry had urged. In December 1974, the Democratic Congress ended military aid to South Vietnam. In April 1975, Saigon fell.
According to a 2001 investigation by the Orange County Register, Hanoi's communist regime imprisoned a million Vietnamese without charge in "re-education" camps, where an estimated 165,000 perished. "Thousands were abused or tortured: their hands and legs shackled in painful positions for months, their skin slashed by bamboo canes studded with thorns, their veins injected with poisonous chemicals, their spirits broken with stories about relatives being killed," the Register reported.
Laos and Cambodia also fell to communists in 1975. Time magazine reported in 1978 that some 40,000 Laotians had been imprisoned in re-education camps: "The regime's figures do not include 12,000 unfortunates who have been packed off to Phong Saly. There, no pretense at re-education is made. As one high Pathet Lao official told Australian journalist John Everingham, who himself spent eight days in a Lao prison last year, 'No one ever returns.' "
The postwar horrors of Vietnam and Laos paled next to the "killing fields" of Cambodia, where the Khmer Rouge undertook an especially vicious revolution. During that regime's 3 1/2-year rule, at least a million Cambodians, and perhaps as many as two million, died from starvation, disease, overwork or murder. The Vietnamese invaders who toppled the Khmer Rouge in 1979 were liberators, albeit only by comparison.
In the aftermath of America's withdrawal from Vietnam, hundreds of thousands of refugees fled Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos. According to the U.N. High Commissioner on Refugees, between 1975 and 1995 more than 1.4 million Indochinese escaped, nearly 800,000 of them by boat. This does not include "boat people" who died at sea, 10% of the total by some estimates.
Of course, that's fine with you since "let 'em kill each other off" seems to be your motto. Why would that be I wonder? I wonder?
I haven't heard that one before, so I decided to check.. it seems David Duke does endorse Ron Paul.. who woulda thunk.. at that, David Duke's site seems to be an unofficial Ron Paul 08 site right now.. lol..
http://www.davidduke.com/
http://www.davidduke.com/general/ron-paul-scores-19-percent-in-illinois-straw-poll_2621.html#more-2621
Ron Paul is a truly great American and our best chance to reverse all the un-Constitutional abuses by the neocons and the Bush administration over the last six and a half years.
http://www.davidduke.com/general/ron-paul-outdoes-rivals-in-iowa-draws-bigger-crowd-than-main-event_2369.html
If we can defeat the corporate big shots and elitist snobs running Washington, DC, then maybe we can pull off a similar victory with Ron Paul.
Good to know you exists. My own opinion is that Ron Paul supporters are really just leftists trying to mess with the Republican nomination process.
Trying to confuse voters, create outrageous candidates to make the average American think Republicans are crazy, and the like.
Why else would I see Ron Paul signs around with what appear to be hammers and sickles? (not graffiti, but the signs themselves)
Isn't Grover Norquist the guy who runs the National Taxpayers' Union? Isn't he the one who converted to Islam when he married a Muslim woman? Whatever could his agenda be in scrubbing the Galveston shrimpin' porkmeister? On top of which, what is mere money compared to 50 million + innocent unborn humans sliced, diced and hamburgerized while paleoPaulie poses for holy pictures as a pro-lifer but resists any meaningful attempt to put an end to the slaughter on the basis of faux "constitutionalist" fussiness???
There are areas like the protection of the innocent human lives of each and every person where the constitution itself provides national jurisdiction.
Is the Dukester still working out of Moscow?
The guy was a moonbat infiltrator from Day 1. Just like his candidate of choice.
Updating Tag Line
The claims come from a loony. That's proven by the links. And when a loony claims that the "proof was destroyed" ergo no proof other than what he claims, I take it with a grain of salt. Whether Ron Paul supports these claims or not has not yet been proven. However pre-poll comments by him do indicate he may have sympathy for them (at the very least).
So do you take these rants as gospel? Do you? Do you, then also take this idiot's ravings about 9/11 being a Zionist plot as gospel? Do you? Or do you believe the first claim but not the latter? Do you? If so, where do you draw the line with such idiots?
If you think I'm a seminar poster that's the biggest laugh I've had for a long time. Thanks for making it a funny day.
The article is not written by David Duke, and i'll offer you the same challenge that wideawake failed to take up. (although he/she posted the same drivel from Duke's website)
Produce any primary source statement of David Duke's endoursement of Ron Paul for the Republican Presidential Nomination.
i won't be holding my breath in anticipation
{giggle}
“In 1995, when the “unbelievable” tie occurred between CFR favorites Senator Bob Dole and Senator Phil Graham – the doors were locked for two solid hours after the voting ended.”
This HAS to be BS. CFR is JUST a think-tank. (sarc)
Waaaaaaaaaaah!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.