[bcsco]

The whole point of the article is the "proof" was destroyed while behind locked doors and again, while I don't give a hoot about Ron Paul you can't take his claims and totally dismiss them unless you are one of the ones seeking to limit his support or naive.

The claims come from a loony. That's proven by the links. And when a loony claims that the "proof was destroyed" ergo no proof other than what he claims, I take it with a grain of salt. Whether Ron Paul supports these claims or not has not yet been proven. However pre-poll comments by him do indicate he may have sympathy for them (at the very least).

So do you take these rants as gospel? Do you? Do you, then also take this idiot's ravings about 9/11 being a Zionist plot as gospel? Do you? Or do you believe the first claim but not the latter? Do you? If so, where do you draw the line with such idiots?

If you think I'm a seminar poster that's the biggest laugh I've had for a long time. Thanks for making it a funny day.

[EndWelfareToday]

So do you take these rants as gospel? Do you? Do you, then also take this idiot's ravings about 9/11 being a Zionist plot as gospel? Do you? Or do you believe the first claim but not the latter? Do you? If so, where do you draw the line with such idiots?

Hey! I'm not here to argue with you. I gave my opinion. I even spelled it out quite clearly where I stand in the matter. If reading comprehension is a quality you seem to lack then I apologize. It's not my fault. If you read what I posted and you comprehended what I posted then the answers to your questions have already been given.

Good night!