Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"his first amendment rights allow him to do what he's doing."...How does his first amendment rights balance against child molestation?
1 posted on 05/24/2007 8:43:37 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: AngelesCrestHighway

Where is the father and other men in the community to take care of this guy?


2 posted on 05/24/2007 8:46:44 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Ask the ACLU, I’m sure they made sure he could get away with this.

And I would have to agree, if I was a father of one of those children there I would make it my solemn vow to hunt this man down and eliminate him in the most painful and lengthy means possible.

Be sure, there would be no evidence left, and I would have a few rock solid alibis, namely the other parents ;)


3 posted on 05/24/2007 8:49:05 AM PDT by gjones77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Why is this pervert predator still loose?


5 posted on 05/24/2007 8:50:11 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

“I think he needs to be put in his place, I think he needs to stop using children for his own selfish pleasures,”

I think he needs to be shot.


9 posted on 05/24/2007 8:57:09 AM PDT by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
How does his first amendment rights balance against child molestation?

A lynch mob wouldn't take that into consideration. I'm not advocating for lynch mobs. I'm just sayin.

12 posted on 05/24/2007 9:00:48 AM PDT by SittinYonder (Ic þæt gehate, þæt ic heonon nelle fleon fotes trym, ac wille furðor gan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
The state senator is a brass-plated numbskull. The First Amendment does not give anyone the right to publish a photograph of a minor without the consent of the guardian of that minor -- and that's even before the libel/slander aspects of this creep's website, that he implies that the children shown have had, or are willing to have, sex with him and creeps like him.

The only thing dumber than a freshman Congressman is a state legislator who talks before he/she has thought.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article: "The Farmers Branch Absurdity"

24 posted on 05/24/2007 9:13:04 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Please visit www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
How can this man post a minor's picture on his site without the permission of her parents, if she did not send it to him, or post it on the web herself?

Heck, in Girl Scouts, we had to have written permission from the parents in order to take pictures of girls doing various activities, just in case those might later be used for news stories about the activity, or for advertising for the Girl Scouts.

25 posted on 05/24/2007 9:14:42 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

There is never a “lone gunman” around when you need one.


29 posted on 05/24/2007 9:20:14 AM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

First ammendment is not ABSOLUTE, yelling FIRE in a crowded building when there is none.. Willfully Inciting a Riot etc. I’d have to believe this guys web site clearly is covered by conspiracy laws.. he’s conspiring with unnamed coconspirators to commit felony acts.

DA, get to work.


34 posted on 05/24/2007 9:30:19 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

He gets away with photographing children without their knowledge or consent; and posting their pictures on websites while TV and newspapers must get a consent form signed by the parent or legal guardian before taking pictures of any child and posting them. Yet he considers it illegal if someone does the same thing to him. Here is a comment from his own website...

“Members of the media and other uninvited people on my property may be photographed and charged with trespassing. Members of the media and other people who follow me or my relatives may be photographed and charged under Washington’s felony stalking law.”

Can you believe it? According to this, it is illegal for anyone to follow or take pictures of this psychopath; while it is perfectly legal and protected for him to do the same thing to one/many of our children and then to post the pics for other pedophiles to view.

Laws need to be changed in every state to address and correct this hypocracy and protect our children!


38 posted on 05/24/2007 9:34:47 AM PDT by one of His mysterious ways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
From Fox News:

McClellan says his purpose is to promote association, friendship and legal, consensual hugging and cuddling between men and pre-pubescent girls. He admitted to FOX News that his "age of attraction" is between 3 and 11 years old.

"I guess the main thing is I just think they're cute, a lot cuter than women. I admit there is kind of an erotic arousal there," McClellan said.

McClellan wants to bring pedophiles out of the closet and give them a way to get some relief, by going out and being around little girls. He suggests a number of places, such as plays at elementary schools, parks, swimming pools and libraries.

"I really think a lot of this pedophilia hysteria is overblown. I think there are a lot of people like me. They have the attraction but they're not going to do anything physical because of the laws. It just makes me happy to attend these events."

But he said while it's OK to look, it's not OK to touch, given the many state laws in place to protect children against that.

"I know it sounds kind of crazy, but there's kind of a code of ethics that these pedophiles have developed and what it is ... the contact has to be completely consensual, no coercion, if you're going to do it," McClellan said.

39 posted on 05/24/2007 9:37:01 AM PDT by jordan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Hm...


43 posted on 05/24/2007 9:39:49 AM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

I would be shaking with anger if I was her mom!


48 posted on 05/24/2007 9:43:14 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Bump


53 posted on 05/24/2007 9:52:48 AM PDT by mtbrandon49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

If that were my daughter, this son of a bitch would be a greasy spot. I would litterally rip his balls off.

Pardon my language, but I am absolutely incredulous.


56 posted on 05/24/2007 9:54:45 AM PDT by T.Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Somebody will dig him up and give him what he really needs-a frontal lobotomy via a ball-peen hammer,just for starters.


58 posted on 05/24/2007 10:00:10 AM PDT by gimme1ibertee ( Hillary...WHO?....Save theObama Fo'Yo' momma!.........RUNFREDRUN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Wasn’t there a guy in Seattle that killed a couple of kid sex predators? He found their names and addresses on the government website that lists where these animals live.

Or am I thinking of another location?


65 posted on 05/24/2007 10:05:46 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
How does his first amendment rights balance against child molestation?

Posting a photo online is not molestation. Punish the wrong acts he commits, not every act committed by someone who has committed wrong acts in the past. Otherwise, you might as well throw out the entire Constitution.

Don't allow our appallingly poor politicians to start saying that anything that might scare someone should be tightly monitored, controlled, or forbidden.

67 posted on 05/24/2007 10:07:59 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Interesting, we can restrict free speech before an election but cannot protect our most precious resource, our children. Convenient how the 1ST amendment works for some people.


68 posted on 05/24/2007 10:12:26 AM PDT by JayAr36 (No Party, just a Conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Mom needs to exercise her own constitutional rights and buy a gun. Then she should shoot this guy, drag him over to her house, then call the cops.


77 posted on 05/24/2007 10:31:11 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson