Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BBC: Protein links T. rex to chickens ~ ummm tasty....
BBC ^ | Thursday, 12 April 2007, 19:27 GMT 20:27 UK | Paul Rincon Science reporter, BBC News

Posted on 04/12/2007 1:57:11 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

By Paul Rincon


Science reporter, BBC News


T. rex thighbone   Image: Science


Protein extracted from 68 million-year-old T. rex bones has shed new light on the evolutionary link between dinosaurs and birds.

Researchers compared organic molecules preserved in the T. rex fossils with those of living animals, and found they were similar to chicken protein.

The discovery of protein in dinosaur bones is a surprise - organic material was not thought to survive this long.

A US team of researchers have published the finding in Science journal.

The team says their technique could help reveal evolutionary relationships between other living and extinct organisms.

The finding is consistent with the idea that birds can trace a direct evolutionary line to dinosaurs.

The goal of obtaining sequences either from proteins or DNA for extinct [organisms] has been a long-standing goal

Brooks Hanson, Science journal

The proteins are original organic material from the dinosaur's soft tissue, and not contamination, the scientists argue.

According to theories of fossilisation, original organic material is not thought to survive as long as this; finding them in a fossil this old is a genuine surprise. They are by far the oldest such molecules extracted from fossils.

"It has always been assumed that preservation of [dinosaur bones] does not extend to the cellular and molecular level," said co-author Mary Schweitzer, from North Carolina State University in Raleigh, US.

"The pathways of cellular decay are well known for modern organisms. And extrapolations predict that all organics are going to be gone completely in 100,000 years, maximum."

Brooks Hanson, an editor at Science journal said: "The goal of obtaining sequences either from proteins or DNA for extinct [organisms] has been a long-standing goal to test evolutionary links and processes, or even functional information."

The work builds on an earlier discovery of soft tissue - including blood vessels - by Dr Schweitzer's team in the same, incredibly well-preserved Tyrannosaurus rex fossils.

Exceptional preservation

The dinosaur remains - which include a skull, both thigh bones and both tibiae (shin bones) - were unearthed from rocks in the Hell Creek Formation of eastern Montana, US.

The fossils were buried under at least 1,000 cubic metres of loose sandstone, interspersed with muds, which are thought to represent ancient stream channel sediments.

Hell Creek, Montana  Image: Science
The bones were buried under 1,000 cubic metres of rock in Montana

The proteins found in the T. rex bones belong to the elastic connective fibres - known as collagen - that support other tissues in the body.

Collagen makes up most of the organic material in bone, which consists of both minerals and protein. It is the same substance injected into the lips, and other areas of the body, in cosmetic surgery procedures.

When minerals are removed from human bone, a collagen matrix is left behind. The US scientists performed the same operation on the T.rex fossil, and found what appeared to be residual traces of collagen.

The findings of protein in the bones were confirmed by mass sepctrometry, a sensitive technique that identifies chemicals by their atomic mass.

It was able to show the T.rex material contained sequences of amino acids - protein building blocks - typical of collagen.

Chicken-like

When the scientists compared the protein sequence pattern to those of living animals in a database, it was found to be structurally similar to chicken collagen, and there were also similarities with frog and newt protein.

Dr Schweitzer said the similarity to chickens was exactly what one would expect given the relationship between modern birds and dinosaurs."

Dr Jack Horner, a co-author from the Museum of the Rockies in Bozeman, Montana, explained that extraordinarily well-preserved fossils such as the ones in question were probably not unique.

"To get specimens like that involves excavating enormous amounts of material, covered with tens of feet of rock," Dr Horner said.

"The T.rex was under a thousand cubic yards of rock and therefore in a position not to have been invaded by bacteria or groundwater," he said.

"I think we're learning an important lesson here - that if we do get specimens like this, we spend a lot of time getting as deep into the sediment as we can in places where there has been very little atmospheric or water contamination."

Dinosaurs, excluding bird lineages, disappeared from the face of the planet 65 million years ago. The reptiles are thought to have been killed off by an asteroid impact which struck off the present-day Yucatan peninsula in Mexico.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: callingcolsanders; catastrophism; godsgravesglyphs; maryschweitzer; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Pope Benedict ‘believes in evolution’
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1816636/posts


41 posted on 04/13/2007 4:03:42 AM PDT by familyop (Essayons (has-been))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Ever looked at the rear end of a rhino? Skinny tails, they have...

this one has lost his horn.

but this one seems to be intact.

Crikey!

42 posted on 04/13/2007 5:15:49 AM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: Dave Elias
"Describes most religious texts"

No, it describes evolution. But by all means, please elaborate.

~grin~

44 posted on 04/13/2007 7:24:12 AM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Boxen
"Such a sophisticated and well supported opinion!"

Thank you.

45 posted on 04/13/2007 7:25:08 AM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Nothing specifically supports it.

~grin~


46 posted on 04/13/2007 7:26:32 AM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BlueDragon
"That is not [directly] what they are saying...and it's not what they may assume the suggested similarity may mean."

So I'm right then?

47 posted on 04/13/2007 7:27:35 AM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Good post.


48 posted on 04/13/2007 7:29:08 AM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

The Gods must be crazy. :’)


49 posted on 04/13/2007 10:00:24 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on Monday, April 2, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4

Right about what, precisely?


50 posted on 04/13/2007 12:44:04 PM PDT by BlueDragon (never hire on to go out to sea, on a boat that has shiny pump handles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Since T. Rex is now considered to be a type of chicken, does that mean they had feathers?


51 posted on 04/13/2007 12:48:02 PM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
>BBC: Protein links T. rex to chickens ~ ummm tasty....


52 posted on 04/13/2007 12:50:40 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
>No damn T-Rex shrunk down over eons to become a friggin chicken!

Maybe they're still big
but the rest of the cosmos
has gotten bigger!

53 posted on 04/13/2007 12:54:05 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rrc

““Evolution is a fairy tale for grownups.” Dr. Louis Bounoure, Director of the Zoological Museum and Director of Research at the National Center of Scientific Research in France”

I think you’ll find Bounoure did not say that, nor for that matter was he ever ‘Director of the Zoological Museum and Director of Research at the National Center of Scientific Research in France’ nor was he even a member.

He was a professor of biology at the University of Strasbourg.

Jean Rostand’s actual quotation was “Transformism is a fairy tale for adults.” and is actually a rebuttal of Lamarkian evolution (traits aquired during a organisms lifetime are passed as genetic legacy to the offspring)of which Transformism is a cornerstone.

Why if you feel the case againsts evolution is so strong do you feel the need to fabricate quotations and attribute them to whomsoever you feel best supports your cause?


54 posted on 04/13/2007 4:16:39 PM PDT by Dave Elias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

To: Fred Nerks
Ever looked at the rear end of a rhino?

Not until after a six pack or two.
56 posted on 04/13/2007 6:46:42 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4

I was being sarcastic.


57 posted on 04/13/2007 6:52:55 PM PDT by Boxen (Branigan's law is like Branigan's love--Hard and fast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer
Not until after a six pack or two.

There's a Helen Thomas joke in there somewhere...

58 posted on 04/13/2007 8:55:06 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: rrc

Except you didn’t provide source at all for the Bounoure quote, which is understandable since there is no direct source for this statement from him.

What you actually provide source for is Jean Rostand whose precise quotation is as follows: “Transformism is a fairy tale for adults.” (Age Nouveau, [a French periodical] February 1959, p. 12).

And what do you know a search of the CRNS website (http://www.cnrs.fr/index.html)reveals no mention of Bounoure rather stange if he was once head honco don’t you think?

and here is a list of the Director Generals:

Jean Coulomb : 1957-1962
Hubert Curien : 1969-1973
Robert Chabbal : 1976-1980
François Kourilsky : 1988 - 1994
Guy Aubert : 1994 - 1997
Catherine Bréchignac : 1997 - 2000
Geneviève Berger : 2000 - 2003
Bernard Larrouturou : 2003- 2006
Arnold Migus : 2006-

Bounoure is rather conspicuous by his absence, what?


59 posted on 04/13/2007 11:18:59 PM PDT by Dave Elias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

Comment #60 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson