Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Statement from Duke President Richard H. Brodhead, RE: Dropped Lacrosse Case
Duke University ^ | 4/11/07 | Richard H. Brodhead

Posted on 04/12/2007 9:53:40 AM PDT by Reaganesque

Durham, NC -- I join with everyone who cares about justice in welcoming the North Carolina State Attorney General’s announcement that the remaining charges have been dropped against David Evans, Collin Finnerty and Reade Seligmann. This announcement comes at the end of an extraordinarily painful year for the young men and their families. They have carried themselves with dignity through an ordeal of deep unfairness.

Let’s be clear about what was said today. The Attorney General did not dismiss the allegations on narrow, equivocal or legalistic ground. He determined our students to be innocent of the charges and said they were “the tragic result of a rush to accuse.” In short, he used the strongest language of vindication.

From the outset, I have been careful to note that these students were entitled to the presumption of innocence and I looked to the legal system to determine the merit of the charges. Now, finally, that process has given us a decision based on a thorough and objective review of the evidence. This is what we have all needed from the start. I trust the State Bar’s review will be equally thorough so that we can understand the District Attorney’s conduct in this case. As for Duke, while not reliving the past year, we won’t be afraid to go back and learn what we can from this difficult experience.

During the past year, the world has known these young men, their teammates and a great university largely through the filter of unproven allegations. I trust that today’s decision will begin a new day for all involved.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: administration; brodhead; duke; dukelax; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-180 next last
To: zaxxon

Now, that comment may be a problem for Ms. Broverman. She should clearly be fired at this point as she represents Duke. Her or any other professor can not continue to insinuate the guys are guilty at this point with the AG saying they are innocent. Brodhead has to fire her or that may open Duke up to liability.


121 posted on 04/12/2007 11:56:51 AM PDT by NorthFlaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I am a graduate of Duke.

ALL of their requests for funds simply go in the trash can.

Not one more dime!


122 posted on 04/12/2007 11:58:11 AM PDT by Jonathan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I am a graduate of Duke.

ALL of their requests for funds simply go in the trash can.

Not one more dime!


123 posted on 04/12/2007 11:58:17 AM PDT by Jonathan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: devane617

I met Reade Seligmann last year while both of us were doing volunteer work in a church soup kitchen here in NJ. What an outstanding young man. I told him about FR and we were with them all.


124 posted on 04/12/2007 12:04:18 PM PDT by Pharmboy ([She turned me into a] Newt! in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Blue Scourge

I hope those families take those bastards to the cleaners.

Add the fired lacrosse coach, too.


125 posted on 04/12/2007 12:09:03 PM PDT by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NorthFlaRebel

Falsely accused. Falsely indicted. I’d wager that the LAX players and coach don’t consider the Duke administration to have protected their rights whatsoever.

I don’t know if your assertion is correct or not, but even if it is, it’s a no less a travesty in cases like this. Brodhead still screwed up, the Gang of 88 is still a bunch of leftist harpies, and the school administration deserves every bit of criticism and scrutiny that it so uncomfortably finds itself under as of yesterday.

Multiply that about 100 times for the DA (and those who voted him back in office when evidence was already shown to be non-existent in the case), the ADA’s and perhaps some of the police dept.


126 posted on 04/12/2007 12:13:59 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (I support the troops AND THE MISSION.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Blue Scourge

And the lacrosse coach who was unjustly fired.


127 posted on 04/12/2007 12:15:00 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
From the sidelines of the event, however, sex-assault advocates say the intense publicity should not make people think that campus rape is a rarity.

"Sex assault advocates?"

What the.....?

128 posted on 04/12/2007 12:19:04 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Oh, I agree they screwed up, and that Gang of 88 are a piece of you know what. They certainly deserve scrutiny and criticism.


129 posted on 04/12/2007 12:19:43 PM PDT by NorthFlaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: CDHart

An email that I already sent to Duke in January:

I very much appreciate this note from you. In the past, because our daughter is a recent Duke graduate, my wife and I have made small donations to Duke. We make more substantial donations to our own colleges. I make these donations to my university both because I appreciate the education I received from its faculty and because I feel strongly about the role a university should play in society. This role is principally to teach and to pursue the truth, including but not limited to the pursuit of truth in academic research. I believe that President Brodhead had an opportunity to further the university’s mission by demonstrating fairness and courage during a difficult time. He failed to take advantage of this opportunity. As I wrote to President Brodhead in April, it is easy to express principles but difficult to act in accordance with them. Instead of continual apologia such as the letter from Mr. Burness in today’s Wall Street Journal, I believe that Duke owes its students, alumni and the public a true apology for its failures in this matter. As a Duke alumnus was quoted in the January 22nd edition of The Chronicle: “It’s just my hope that Duke will admit some of the instances where they might have been wrong and work to make sure this doesn’t happen again, where Duke students are targeted by Durham authorities and Duke’s own faculty would be cited in a defense change-of-venue motion. It’s in their best interest that it’s not a part of Duke’s reputation.”


130 posted on 04/12/2007 12:21:54 PM PDT by TBBBO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I don’t care if these families have millions...I hope they sue and win millions, and donate the money to a charity.

This statement is ludicrous.


131 posted on 04/12/2007 12:24:16 PM PDT by sissyjane (Fred!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
No, he’s not even making nice. He claims that he supported the presumption of innocence from the beginning, but that didn’t prevent him from suspending the students, firing the coach and opening an investigation into the effects of athleticism on campus (in other words investigation the macho culture of helmet sports). The real investigation should have been into the hate mongering of the campus multi-culturists which stirred up all the insecurities of imagined victimhood among the minorities and drove the rush to judgment as representative of so-called privileged, white male culture.
132 posted on 04/12/2007 12:26:04 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

He should offer to trade places with the fired Lacrosse coach. The greater loss would be to whatever team Broadhead ends up coaching.


133 posted on 04/12/2007 12:27:37 PM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution ? 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

How about an apology for the reprehensible way you and your faculty treated these innocent young men, their coach and the lacrosse program???


134 posted on 04/12/2007 12:28:11 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

This dude is a weasel. If it were me I would sue him, the 88, the county, the DA and anyone else I could think of to sue.


135 posted on 04/12/2007 12:29:08 PM PDT by alarm rider (Why should I not vote my conscience?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

And what was the coach’s name? Where is he working now?


136 posted on 04/12/2007 12:30:49 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS

Any suit against CGM can prohibit her profiting from this fiasco.


137 posted on 04/12/2007 12:37:06 PM PDT by El Gran Salseron (The World-Famous, popular DJ and FReeper Canteen Certified, Equal-Opportunity, Male-Chauvinist-Pig!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

I was just looking on FR to see what has been posted about this case. I think it closely parallels the Dirty dishonest prosecutor of Ignacio Ramos and Jose Campean, brave border patrol agents. They didn’t let the evidence in their trial, plus they were prosecuted with lies. Glad these La Crosse boys got OFF. Our justice system is so messed up when Martha Stewart goes to prison for lying and Bill and Hillary Clinton don’t. Plus not to mention OJ, Robert Blake, Ted Kennedy, and others who SHOULD be in prison now.


138 posted on 04/12/2007 12:38:26 PM PDT by NEBO (Reid Hillary Pelosi Schumer stuck on stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan

And if I were young and a stripper and I stripped at a party full of drunk frat boys I would expect to get raped. duh.


139 posted on 04/12/2007 12:39:16 PM PDT by NEBO (Reid Hillary Pelosi Schumer stuck on stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

I’m not defending Brodhead or most of his actions, but Duke’s rules do stipulate that any student charged with a felony be suspended.


140 posted on 04/12/2007 12:39:36 PM PDT by Dukie07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-180 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson