Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani is a Liar (vanity)
Various | 3/29/07 | Pissant/various

Posted on 03/29/2007 7:21:40 AM PDT by pissant

Sean Hannity Interview, 2007:

HANNITY: Let me move on. And the issue of guns has come up a lot. When people talk about Mayor Giuliani, New York City had some of the toughest gun laws in the entire country. Do you support the right of people to carry handguns?

GIULIANI: I understand the Second Amendment. I support it. People have the right to bear arms. When I was mayor of New York, I took over at a very, very difficult time. We were averaging about 2,000 murders a year, 10,000...

HANNITY: You inherited those laws, the gun laws in New York?

GIULIANI: Yes, and I used them. I used them to help bring down homicide. We reduced homicide, I think, by 65-70 percent. And some of it was by taking guns out of the streets of New York City.

So if you're talking about a city like New York, a densely populated area like New York, I think it's appropriate. You might have different laws other places, and maybe a lot of this gets resolved based on different states, different communities making decisions. After all, we do have a federal system of government in which you have the ability to accomplish that.

From a 2000 interview with Tim Russert:

Tim Russert: How about registration of ALL handguns?

Rudy Giuliani: Uh, you know I'm in favor of that. I've been on your show many times, talking about, uh, the program that the president (Clinton) talked about in his state of the union speech - I have been giving speeches about and talked about on your show for the last 10 to 15 years. Which is, I believe, is that we should treat the possession of a handgun the way we treat driving an automobile.

And therefore a person who wants to possess a handgun should pass a written test, should be able to pass a physical test in the actual use of the gun, and should have to demonstrate good moral character and a REASON to have the gun.

That those should be, essentially there should be a UNIFORM LAW PASSED BY CONGRESS that says that every state has to administer that, the way we say that we're not going to let you drive an automobile if you're too young, we're not going let you drive an automobile if you had a bad record, and uh, every state has a slightly different variation of that, but every state has a uniform law that guarantees our safety. I think the two things are good analogies, and I've been arguing for that since at least 1980.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: banglist; desperate; dunkandoughnut; giuliani; haironfire; rudy; rudy2008; rudytherino; zomg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 441-444 next last
To: Torie
The "rest of the story" isn't much better.

On one hand you have Rudy Giuliani stating that people have the right to bear arms, while at the same time (which is something neither he nor Hannity saw fit to mention) he was doing everything in his power to see to it that almost nobody in New York City could exercise that right.

What people have to understand is that "the right to keep and bear arms" in New York City is a "right" that is pretty much afforded only to law enforcement officers, licensed security guards, and celebrities. This sounds like the kind of policy that would come from a bunch of star-crossed dipsh!ts like the Clinton administration.

121 posted on 03/29/2007 8:43:09 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: pissant
as a nominee is not something any right thinking republican can contemplate.

yet the traditionalist / vote republican / knuckle draggers howled this past fall when those of us pissed with republican nonsense threatened to take our votes elsewhere or sit out, and pleaded with us to stay in camp...just so we stay in power

IMO - were seeing this all over again, have another cup of coffee and call me in Oct '08 - youll be singing the same tune

BTW - probably the most entertaining post of the day - honestly

122 posted on 03/29/2007 8:44:49 AM PDT by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RabidBartender

You are so right. They hate it so much they have tried to make it their own by twisting it to suit their own agendas. Of course, since it was uttered by the genius Ben Franklin it just doesn't fit into their liberal logic. Somehow, defending oursleves against the islamo-goblins is the same as tearing up the Constitution.


123 posted on 03/29/2007 8:48:01 AM PDT by Ajnin (Neca Eos Omnes. Deus Suos Agnoset.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Seems that we have a lot of people here telling us that we have to vote for Rooty and won't take 'NO' for an answer. Maybe we haven't been plain enough.

Before I would vote for Rooty I would nail my whanger to the chair and set the house on fire. Really.


124 posted on 03/29/2007 8:49:30 AM PDT by Hatband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Then the restrictions of it have to be reasonable and sensible. You can’t just remove that right. You’ve got to regulate, consistent with the Second Amendment.

Regarding his proposals, personally I don't think handgun bans are reasonable at all, nor is the assault weapons ban, which bans rifles solely based on their looks. There's no legitimate social need to ban ugly looking rifles. Licensing by definition includes the right of denial, that won't hold up. Obviously Rudy disagrees.

Then there are his actions. "Stop and Frisk" to check for illegal handguns. Unconstitutional, I'd say that falls under unreasonable.

The manufacturers lawsuit, rejected by the courts, Congress, and the President. Reasonable to consider it unreasonable.

I don't trust Rudy's ability to make "reasonable" judgements when it comes to firearms. His concern isn't the second amendment, it's law enforcement.

125 posted on 03/29/2007 8:50:56 AM PDT by SJackson (restoring the Jews to their homeland is a noble dream shared by many Americans, A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: pissant

"I didn't want to pile on."

Most of these (endless) Rudy threads remind me of AC's (I believe) definition of a liberal:
"Anyone unwilling to take his own side in an argument."

Supporting a candidate who favors gun-control and abortion (among many other odious things) is just fine--
on Democratic Underground. But that's the great thing about FR: you can speak your piece.*


126 posted on 03/29/2007 8:51:53 AM PDT by tumblindice (*Like the 2nd Amend., yours, if you can defend it. ..........How is it possible to have a civil war?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: pissant

127 posted on 03/29/2007 8:53:23 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

NOt on public roads at least..




Which is a big distinction from registering "horses"


128 posted on 03/29/2007 8:56:01 AM PDT by RedMonqey ( The truth is never PC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem

I'm more worried about Rudy as President. The linguini spined GOP in Congress will at least make a show of fighting Hillary.


Exactly, a "moderate" Republican in the White House is more dangerous than a liberal Democrat.


129 posted on 03/29/2007 9:03:20 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Duncan Hunter '08 Pro family, pro life, pro second Amendment, not a control freak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Lx

Now that's just silly. Rudy is going to be worse than Hillary!, really?


It's not about Hillary and Rudy, it's about how the Congress would respond.


130 posted on 03/29/2007 9:04:33 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Duncan Hunter '08 Pro family, pro life, pro second Amendment, not a control freak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: RabidBartender

The gun control issue will be off the table in 2008 if the SCOTUS rules as expected on the 2nd District finding for a 2nd Amendment INDIVIDUAL right to bear arms.

Last I looked we were a constitutional republic. That means that states may have different registration regulations, but they have to be faithful to the SCOTUS ruling, just as much as the US Congress.


131 posted on 03/29/2007 9:06:24 AM PDT by neocon1984 (end the idiocy of post-modernism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey

I do too.


Remember. You do not need a license to OWN an automobile, just to operate it on PUBLIC ROADS



I don't believe that. I shouldn't have to become a sheep in order to leave my front door. Besides there is still that pesky Second Amendment.


132 posted on 03/29/2007 9:07:10 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Duncan Hunter '08 Pro family, pro life, pro second Amendment, not a control freak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
"Sean Hannity is becoming as appealing..."

I have stopped watching him and listening to his radio broadcasts.

His glumming on to Rudy and disrespectful treatment of a Catholic Priest during a discussion of birth control turned me off.

Hey Sean, what's new with Brittany?
133 posted on 03/29/2007 9:12:57 AM PDT by mr_hammer (Show me just what liberalism brought that was new, and there you will find things evil & inhuman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: pissant

134 posted on 03/29/2007 9:27:05 AM PDT by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hatband

Ouch! That's gonna leave a mark!


135 posted on 03/29/2007 9:32:29 AM PDT by TommyDale ("Rudy can win the War on Terror!" Perhaps, but for whose side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2
Well, the reason rationale is built-in - "because I can" (that whole 2nd Amendment thing). But then, normal people already know that ;'}
136 posted on 03/29/2007 9:32:56 AM PDT by rockrr (Never argue with a man who buys ammo in bulk...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
You take away a gun, they'll grab a knife. Take away the knife, they'll grab a bat. Take away a bat... you see where I'm headed.

Don't punish the law abiding citizens because idiots choose to commit violent crimes. Guns don't kill people. PEOPLE kill people.

137 posted on 03/29/2007 9:35:14 AM PDT by rintense (I'm 4 Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pissant
It will be picked up in the blogosphere, believe me.

This isn't about Rudy, or the election or anything else but you...seek help.

Sincerely.

138 posted on 03/29/2007 9:40:21 AM PDT by Mr.Unique (Global Emergency!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Unique

Glad you are sincere. But I could have sworn a primary was going on.


139 posted on 03/29/2007 9:42:54 AM PDT by pissant (Gimme a beer, wench.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Hannity made that point yesterday

Invalid as it is.

140 posted on 03/29/2007 9:45:48 AM PDT by Mr.Unique (Global Emergency!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 441-444 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson