Posted on 03/06/2007 8:34:59 AM PST by Dog
Breaking on MSNBC
> She was the curly haired gal on the Clinton team during
> his impeachment process.
Oh well, even a stopped clock can be right twice a day.
The one thing every politician should have had drummed into them since 1973 is: don't lie. "No comment" or take the 5th. Might make you look bad, but it won't get you a stretch in prison.
Then the FBI was investigating a non-crime.
Anyone who spends his/her entire career in Beltway politics is a "hack," as far as I'm concerned -- and that goes for elected officials, bureaucrats, media jack@sses, etc. If that upsets you, then too bad.
OK. Since he and his family have money, he is not entitled to sympathy for having his liberty stolen from him by a rogue prosecutor and jury? This is not a game, and this is not funny. Injustices like this must be confronted. If it can happen to him, it can happen to anyone.
My point is that it goes with the territory, so there's no reason to make a big deal about it. I don't remember seeing too much sympathy here for Betty Currie when she was getting run through the wringer back in 1998-99.
Wells had very little to work with in this case, the judge and jury stacked against him, that stunt with the valentines days shirts, getting that one juror thrown off.
This is DC jury. These people got on the jury to convict. They were not confused about that. No matter how much you pay defense lawyers, it's not going to change that fact.
This was all about "vindicating" and "justifying" Fitz's witch hunt. The WaPo reporter on the jury pretty much said that. "WHERE WAS ROVE, WHERE WERE THE OTHERS...? "
Im still waiting for this woman to spill her guts
And her Vanity Fair picture said as much. With those glasses it was a thumb to the nose to the Bush administration. "I'm covert, so I'm hiding my identity, teehee..."
Say what? What are you talking about?
> Then the FBI was investigating a non-crime.
And that matters, because.... ?
the juror's comments alone prove that they were "confused" about who they were trying and for what
That would be like Hillary wondering if her pants make her butt look big.
do you use nuve9 as your DUmmy name also?
But what that juror SAID was that they really DIDN'T want to convict him, but he was guilty so they did anyway.
Nothing he said suggested that they convicted him because they wanted to "get" Cheney.
Is it just me or is the WaPo juror saying "where was Rove, Cheney" almost surreal? There is a serious problem here.
Dumb question: Is this the same guy from the jury?
re: Spy book for the museum
About the Author
Denis Collins is a journalist who writes for the Washington Post, the San Jose Mercury News, and the Miami Herald. He lives in Washington, DC.
I can't find one column from any of the papers?
Oh, he wrote this as well:
Behaving Badly: Ethical Lessons from Enron
Obviously he is/was a business ethics professor, here's interviews re: Enron
http://www.likeitismagazine.com/IssueIV/enronethics2.htm
http://www.wisbusiness.com/index.iml?Article=62449
More books:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/002-4173428-8300041?%5Fencoding=UTF8&search-type=ss&index=books&field-author=Denis%20Collins
My daughter came and I couldn't watch TV or listen to radio...ugh.
This juror you all are talking about...not only was he a WaPo reporter...but wasn't he a neighbor of Bob Woodward???
if he was half the lawyer everyone thought he was, he would have followed that strategy. Apparently he thought he was even smarter than he was.
CRAP verdict.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.