Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should parents be forced to pay for college and living expenses after 18?

Posted on 02/13/2007 10:08:57 AM PST by GottaLuvAkitas1

The question is college , not child support.

After the age of 18 should a parent/parents be responsible for college and living expenses?

When did college become a right and not a privilege?


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-171 next last
To: LibertarianLiz
We are in agreement about paying for the first degree (within reasonable limits -- i.e. 4 years and excess above what we can afford they take as loans). We have two children in private colleges (a senior and a sophomore) and the combined total is staggering. When our older daughter was not sharing her grades, and the registrar's office gave us the privacy speech, I told my daughter the choice was hers: have a full transcript with the grades mailed to us every semester, or I have written the last college check. Problem solved.

We're fortunate that the graduating senior had landed a full-time post graduation job before Christmas, in a program that sends her to Dartmouth for the summer Business Bridge program and pays for her MBA after 3 years.

101 posted on 02/13/2007 11:08:14 AM PST by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: GottaLuvAkitas1

What state is this?


102 posted on 02/13/2007 11:08:25 AM PST by Andy'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Some kids could do well with being out on their own a couple of years after high school. There is absolutely no law that says you have to go to college directly out of high school. Personally, a year or so working can really mature someone I think.


103 posted on 02/13/2007 11:09:52 AM PST by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973

Age of majoity is 18. Parents ability to pay should not be a factor.


104 posted on 02/13/2007 11:11:09 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine's brother (Jane Fonda was type cast in the movie "Klute")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GottaLuvAkitas1
This requirement is essentially a divorce tax. I personally favor it. While many kids adapt well in a culture that now discards marriage like condoms, the overwhelming statistics show that divorce leads to poverty, crime, social problems, and countless other issues that exact huge costs on our police, mental care, welfare, and health care costs.

One way states combat this is by compelling the parents -- the one's who sought state sanction for the marriage -- to ante up and insure that at least educationally, the by product of your failed marriage is given the best opportunity to succeed economically. Shifting this cost to those who get divorced, is far more appealing than shifting the increased social cost to me.

So -- no, parents have no obligation for kids at 18. (Of course, good parents make sure there kids are successful and help them foster that with financial and emotional support -- particularly in the college years).

States that mandate these costs on divorcing parents do so as a price for those divorce costs to society. I like it.

BTW -- it is an interesting mindset of those looking to drop kids as a cost center at 18. So long sucker -- you are off my back. Whether one is married or divorced, this is probably not a real emotionally strong and intelligent parenting scheme. Unfortunately -- this society continues to move unrelentingly toward a me centered attitude.

If you got married and made a kid -- stick to your obligation not solely because it is your obligation, but because that child is your family -- even when you don't want the spouse to be anymore. This will make for a better life for you, your child, and the rest of us.
105 posted on 02/13/2007 11:12:55 AM PST by Iron Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

When I was going to college in California in the middle Sixties the fee at state schools was 50 bucks a semester.Junior college was totally free.And If you lived at home,all you really needed was a part time job for books,gas money and miscellaneous items.
Now it would be very difficult to be self supporting and go to school full time since most undergraduates would qualify only for minimum wage serice jobs.


106 posted on 02/13/2007 11:12:59 AM PST by Riverman94610
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine's brother
Age of majoity is 18. Parents ability to pay should not be a factor.

Agreed.

107 posted on 02/13/2007 11:16:05 AM PST by Tamar1973 (Note to Hillary, Boxer and Fonda: The peas called, they want their pod back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: luckystarmom
I think the following is reasonable minimum:

2 years community school living at home.

2-3 years at a public university living in a dorm.

Whether this is reasonable or not may depend on where you are in the country: some states have first rate community colleges and first rate public universities -- California comes to mind -- while others have very limited (and not so cheap) community colleges and mediocre state universities (no names), but many excellent private colleges and universities. In some states, again, California comes to mind, it's relatively easy (with a strong record) to transfer from a community college to the flagship university (e.g. University of California, just not Berkeley or UCLA anymore). In other states, most of your community college credits won't transfer and it's rare to transfer from a community college to a flagship public university.

Connecticut is an example of a state with limited community colleges, fourth-to-third rate state colleges, and a barely second tier flagship state university, but excellent private colleges (Wesleyan, Trinity, Connecticut College) and universities (Yale). The vast majority of high school graduates in even middle to upper middle class high schools in Connecticut go to private universities, colleges, or, if they go to public universities, out-of-state flagship universities (e.g. University of California, University of Michigan, University of Virginia, University of Wisconsin).

108 posted on 02/13/2007 11:18:18 AM PST by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: x1stcav

I didn't say it never happens, I said it is seldom the case.


109 posted on 02/13/2007 11:19:01 AM PST by Beagle8U (Jimmy Carter changed me into a Republican.......Ronnie made me DAMN proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
If you don't love your children and have a good enough relationship that you are glad to pay for any education they can get, then there are deeper problems.

Sometimes it has MUCH more to do with what is affordable, what is reasonable, and the extent to which the child belongs in college than whether or not you love them.

110 posted on 02/13/2007 11:22:02 AM PST by VRWCmember (Everyone is entitled to my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

I never understood the amount the university expected parents to give for their kids education. It seemed like they expected 20-30% of gross income. I guess they expected the family to only live on Mac and Cheese while their kid is in college.


111 posted on 02/13/2007 11:24:12 AM PST by art_rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Riverman94610

I hear what you are saying but living expenses were much lower. About that time I was working and paying my way thru Jr. College.


112 posted on 02/13/2007 11:24:53 AM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: null and void
So you agree that parents should be forced to pay for their children's college education?

Interesting discussion, but parents should not be forced to pay for their children's education. We're assisting our daughter (she's a soph at U. of N. Texas), and we'll assist our oldest son when he graduates from HS in May.

However, my wife and I are not going to foot the entire bill for them. We love them dearly, but as adults (however young they may be) they need to bear part of the burden.

Our perspective comes from our own experiences: our parents shouldered no financial burden for our college educations. I paid for mine through an ROTC scholarship (BBA) and GI Bill (MA); my better half worked her way through six years of college. Our parents provided important moral and physical support (i.e. lodging).

Great discussion, though. Each side has its merits. Certainly not a "one size fits all" subject.

113 posted on 02/13/2007 11:25:33 AM PST by Night Hides Not (Chuck Hagel is the Republican Joe Biden!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
my parents helped where they could with me.....they did not have much money .....

we have helped our kids with college, even though we insisted they take out loans so they have some ownership in what they are doing (or not doing!)

of course, we didn't subcumb to the parents loan trap that they keep trying to sell us.....we pay certain expenses and then we give money each month to help defray living expenses.....

why do we do it?...

to give them a handup in life.....to help them get started....because they couldn't get thru college unless someone helped with the expenses.....

people of middle age or older need to know that today's young people are going to need more finacial help then we did....they are saddled with high taxation and an illogical and discriminatory work place and we older people are just going have to help them more....

114 posted on 02/13/2007 11:26:23 AM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mel

Or help them decide what they like and want to pursue. My husband and I talked about this last night and today.


115 posted on 02/13/2007 11:26:43 AM PST by WV Mountain Mama (I'm shocked the gov't hasn't found an average consumption equation to tax breast milk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973

The child go to court and can get a document of emmancipation from the parents to avoid all that and then apply for financial aid on his/her own behalf.

I did this.


116 posted on 02/13/2007 11:28:18 AM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
And, realistically, what you can afford (i.e. the sacrifices one is willing to make) are related to how much the child has demonstrated they will excel in university level work.

We were very clear with our kids that we would pay for a top college or university at the going rate, but that if their academic records would not get them into colleges we thought were sufficiently good, they would have to go to our state's quite mediocre flagship university. We actually had to go so far with one as to make her apply and deposit at the state university, so that if her behavior for the balance of her senior year was not acceptable, she would not be going to the private college she wanted to. Not nice, but it worked.

117 posted on 02/13/2007 11:29:29 AM PST by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: GottaLuvAkitas1
It's not a right, but it is something you want your child to have a choice about. Of course if they are a pile of bricks, there's not point in sending them.

At the minimum be ready to send them to a trade school. you want your kids to do better than you did.

118 posted on 02/13/2007 11:29:49 AM PST by Centurion2000 (If you're not being shot at, it's not a high stress job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973
I'm back in school for the 3rd time....and both my kids are grown. They asked for my parent's signature on the loans too. I just looked at the lady patiently for a couple minutes so she could think about it. She finally said......"Oh...I guess we don't need that, huh?"

No one over 18yrs old and living on their own ...is forced to put their parent's name on any legal document. If they're still living at home....it would probably be cheaper to get Jr. an apartment... then let him glean the grant money, which doesn't have to be repaid.

119 posted on 02/13/2007 11:34:21 AM PST by LaineyDee (Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Andy'smom

"What state is this?"

My sister-in-law lives in Virginia, but her ex. lives in Mo. with the daughter.
The mother raised the child for 6 years after the divorce, and the father this past year. All expenses were split so no child support was ordered.

I feel sorry for everyone involved, but less for my niece. Both parents will do everything they can, but this kid wants to get what she can get now. Sad very sad.


120 posted on 02/13/2007 11:36:03 AM PST by GottaLuvAkitas1 (Ronald Reagan is the TRUE "Father Of Our Country".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson