Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: Questions regarding the Republican Platform, is it pro-life, pro-family?

Posted on 02/04/2007 1:31:12 AM PST by Jim Robinson

I've long assumed that the Republican Party platform included pro-life, pro-family and pro 1st and 2nd amendment planks. Is this true or false? Or is the platform amended each election cycle to conform to the positions of the top polling potential presidential nominee (ie, the one with the most money or star billing and the MSM eye)?

If these planks are based on longstanding, sound conservative principles and are sincerely respected and upheld by the majority of the members, then I'd like to propose a motion that before being seriously considered by the official party powers that be, prospective nominees for the office of President of the United States must in the least demonstrate a solid history of being pro-life, pro-family and pro 1st and 2nd amendments, in addition to a solid history of abiding by and fighting for the other basic Republican planks, ie, national security, national defense, limited government, conservative spending, lower taxes, strict constructionist judges, local control of health, education and welfare, etc, etc.

Or is it too much to ask of the politician asking for our support for the highest office in the land to respect and abide by conservative principles and the basic planks of the party platform?

Or is there a movement underfoot to remove these planks from the platform?


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: conservatism; corevalues; gop; nonnegotiable; norinos; platform; republicanparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-359 next last
To: EternalVigilance
Why are you on a conservative website promoting a hardcore leftist?

I seem to be wondering that about A LOT of FReepers lately.

181 posted on 02/04/2007 12:38:55 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

bttt!


182 posted on 02/04/2007 12:39:32 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Yeah. Me too.


183 posted on 02/04/2007 12:41:14 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Why are you on a conservative website promoting a hardcore leftist?



I'm not. Rudy is conservative on the issues that right now I find more pressing then abortion or guns. Focusing solely on abortion and guns seems very pre 9/11 thought IMO.
184 posted on 02/04/2007 12:41:32 PM PST by Blackirish (GO BEARS!!!!!!!1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

that "hardcore leftist" has been the #1 person that republican candidates from all over the country - have wanted to appear with them in their campaigns and fundraisers.


185 posted on 02/04/2007 12:41:40 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

"Then you and your ilk will have managed to drive any last vestiges of principle from the GOP, leaving it a soulless, heartless shell that will be speedily crushed...as it deserves to be."

But, but, that means Hillary will be elected and we're supposed to compromise and sell our souls to keep that from happening.


186 posted on 02/04/2007 12:41:43 PM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (A Muslim soldier can never be loyal to a non-Muslim commander.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird
When asked, point blank, what the Republican party stands for unequivocably, I was told it is what it is and it will be whatever it will be.

I would say "LOL" if that wasn't so frightening when I think about the future of this country.

187 posted on 02/04/2007 12:41:54 PM PST by cgk (Republicanism didn't make Conservatives a majority. Conservatism made Republicans a majority. [NEWT])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish

What conservative marries their cousin?


188 posted on 02/04/2007 12:42:24 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Can you name a Republican that isn't a log cabin republican that has asked this #1 person to appear at fundraisers?


189 posted on 02/04/2007 12:44:22 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

What conservative marries their cousin?

Hillbilly conservatives?


190 posted on 02/04/2007 12:44:40 PM PST by Blackirish (GO BEARS!!!!!!!1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; wagglebee

Yeah, Me three


191 posted on 02/04/2007 12:45:23 PM PST by gidget7 (2Th 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish

Yo, he's from Brocklyn.

:P


192 posted on 02/04/2007 12:45:41 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish
I'm not. Rudy is conservative on the issues that right now I find more pressing then abortion or guns. Focusing solely on abortion and guns seems very pre 9/11 thought IMO.

Really? What do you make of the fact that of 60 appointments to the bench that Giuliani had available to him as Mayor, NOT ONE of them was a Republican?

By the way, guns are very relevant post-9-11. In fact, in the final analysis, they may be the only relevant thing. Need I remind you that the only people who stopped terrorists from killing people on 9-11 were regular citizens who, upon gaining intelligence information about the hijackers intentions, armed themselves with the only crude weapons they could find and proceeded to kill the enemy?

193 posted on 02/04/2007 12:45:45 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Peach
We've been told for years we WANT a strict constructionist on the benches and in the presidency and now that Rudy has been saying that, ya'll want to change what strict constructionist really means.

I didn't change what 'strict constructionist' really means, I just posted the definition from Wikipedia.

And just because Rudy says he's one doesn't mean he is one.

194 posted on 02/04/2007 12:46:00 PM PST by airborne (Elect an Airborne Ranger,Vietnam Veteran for President ! Duncan Hunter 2008!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Gearge Allen...Rick Santuram...Ralph Reed....


They all lost....must be Rudy's fault.


195 posted on 02/04/2007 12:46:09 PM PST by Blackirish (GO BEARS!!!!!!!1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0
But, but, that means Hillary will be elected and we're supposed to compromise and sell our souls to keep that from happening.

The fact that the liberal hacks in the party are trying to wield that blunt club so early in the process bodes poorly for their plans to make the GOP into a second RAT party.

196 posted on 02/04/2007 12:47:42 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
that "hardcore leftist" has been the #1 person that republican candidates from all over the country - have wanted to appear with them in their campaigns and fundraisers.

Yeah. Politics is full of whores. Your point?

197 posted on 02/04/2007 12:48:51 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; Calpernia

The way I see it, Richard Gephardt and Joe Lieberman are no more liberal than Rudy. Maybe conservatives should support them for the 'Rat nomination. Neither of them have an ounce of charisma and any Republican should be able to beat them easily. And if by chance one of them wins then it won't be a problem to get a conservative elected in 2012.


198 posted on 02/04/2007 12:49:07 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

are you kidding me? Rudy has been supporting republican candidates all over the country.

Rick Santorum is a log cabin republican?

http://www.timesleader.com/mld/timesleader/15928218.htm

I could post articles like this from all over the country.


199 posted on 02/04/2007 12:49:27 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
By the way, guns are very relevant post-9-11. ....Gun isn't gonna save me living in Chicago if a dirty bomb goes off on LaSalle street.

I'd rather have a CIC who will secure the borders and destroy are enemies before that happens
200 posted on 02/04/2007 12:50:36 PM PST by Blackirish (GO BEARS!!!!!!!1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-359 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson