Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ford called Carter a 'disaster'
AP on Yahoo ^ | 1/12/07 | AP

Posted on 01/12/2007 1:45:53 PM PST by NormsRevenge

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. - In 25 years of interviews with his hometown paper that could only be released upon his death, former President Ford once called Jimmy Carter a "disaster" who ranked alongside Warren Harding, and said Ronald Reagan received far too much credit for ending the Cold War.

"It makes me very irritated when Reagan's people pound their chests and say that because we had this big military buildup, the Kremlin collapsed," Ford told The Grand Rapids Press.

The best president of his lifetime, Ford said, was a more moderate Republican: Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Harry Truman "would get very high marks" for his handling of foreign crises, Ford said. He also praised Richard Nixon as a foreign policy master, despite the Watergate scandal that drove him from office.

Ford considered John F. Kennedy overrated and Bill Clinton average. He admired George H.W. Bush's handling of the Persian Gulf War and had mixed opinions of Carter, who defeated Ford in 1976.

In 1981, Ford said: "I think Jimmy Carter would be very close to Warren G. Harding. I feel very strongly that Jimmy Carter was a disaster, particularly domestically and economically. I have said more than once that he was certainly the poorest president in my lifetime."

But two years later, he praised Carter's performance on the Panama Canal treaty, China and the Middle East. And in 1998, he said Carter "will be looked on as a better president than some comments we hear today."

"He was a very decent, fine individual," Ford told the paper. "There were no major mistakes. There just weren't a lot of exciting results."

Ford's gave the interviews on the condition that his remarks be withheld until after his death.

According to the newspaper, Ford declined to rate George W. Bush, saying he did not know him well enough.

Ford said Reagan, who challenged him unsuccessfully for the GOP nomination in 1976, was "a great spokesman for attractive political objectives" such as a balanced budget and defeating communism, "but when it came to implementation, his record never matched his words."

Reagan was "probably the least well-informed on the details of running the government of any president I knew," Ford said. In a separate interview, he said Reagan "was just a poor manager, and you can't be president and do a good job unless you manage."

Ford contended his own negotiation of the Helsinki accords on human rights did more to win the Cold War than Reagan's military buildup. Other key factors were the Marshall Plan that helped rebuild Europe after World War II and the establishment of NATO, he said.

"When you put peace, prosperity and human rights against poverty, a massive unsuccessful military program and a lack of human rights, communism was bound to collapse," he said. "No president, no Democrat or Republican, can claim credit for those programs. I'll tell you who deserves the credit — the American people."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: apbias; carter; carterlegacy; deathofford; disaster; duh; ford; geraldford; jimmuh; jimmycarter; mediabias; worstexpresident
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-267 next last
To: NormsRevenge

Anywhere his record didn't match his words is because "managers" in Congress were kissing Tip O'neil's donkey, instead of fighting and leading.

If Newt adopted Ford's philosophy, there never would have been a revolution in 94.


161 posted on 01/13/2007 5:53:40 AM PST by H.Akston (Jihad - my struggle - mien kampf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

the problem is that ford was a political man.

He knew how to do politics and was advancing himself in the House.

The problem is the Masters of Mediocracy are STILL in charge of the Republican Party!

The mediocrity embodied in Ford with a go along with the USSR to get along with the USSR is infesting the back to 9/10 mentality of people like McCain, Guiliani, Lott, Specter.


162 posted on 01/13/2007 6:06:00 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Ford, never was too bright. He is getting a lot of good mileage out of dying.


163 posted on 01/13/2007 6:16:08 AM PST by School of Rational Thought (Republican - The thinking people's party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
Is it class, or cover, to save your swipes so they come from the grave? Contrast Reagan's approach to "taking" credit:

"I won a nickname, "The Great Communicator." But I never thought it was my style or the words I used that made a difference: It was the content. I wasn't a great communicator, but I communicated great things, and they didn't spring full bloom from my brow, they came from the heart of a great nation— from our experience, our wisdom, and our belief in principles that have guided us for two centuries. They called it the Reagan revolution. Well, I'll accept that, but for me it always seemed more like the great rediscovery, a rediscovery of our values and our common sense. "

-The Carter slap got my attention (headline), but the truth is these quotes from Ford just make him look smaller.

164 posted on 01/13/2007 6:35:51 AM PST by sayfer bullets (Go Pokes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sayfer bullets

Dear sayfer bullets,

Is Mr. Ford now dead long enough that we may criticize him?

I'm not one who was on the Gerald Ford bandwagon.

In his finer moments, he was a mediocrity.

The envy-filled Reagan criticism gives us some inkling of what he was when not at his finest.


sitetest


165 posted on 01/13/2007 6:55:33 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
What Reagan understood is that a modern President needs to be a leader, not a manager.

Exactly. Reagan was a leader; Carter, by contrast, was a paper pusher.

166 posted on 01/13/2007 7:34:51 AM PST by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

An excellent summary. Ford couldn't carry Reagan's shoes.


167 posted on 01/13/2007 7:37:19 AM PST by sruleoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

I love Ronnie, but he did a sh-t job of keeping spending under control, as fiscal discipline was not popular with the "Reagan Democrats."


168 posted on 01/13/2007 7:38:38 AM PST by Clemenza (Rudy Rockefeller Giussolini: Hero to the Braindead and Brainwashed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Considering the following, I think it might have been wise for Ford to bite his tongue about Carter.

Average inflation under Ford: 8.6%
Average inflation under Carter: 9.7%

Average unemployment under Ford: 7.3%
Average unemployment under Carter: 6.5%

The Dow performed better under Ford, but Carter appointed Volcker...

In other words, neither was great, but Ford really shouldn't have been calling Carter a disaster economically when you consider what Carter was given...


169 posted on 01/13/2007 8:36:15 AM PST by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Even in his present condition, Ford could defend the country better than Carter ever did.


170 posted on 01/13/2007 8:56:11 AM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DUH

Harding demobilized, and cut the top tax rate from 90% to 20% (or something like that). He ushered in the 1920s boom that set the stage for our beating back Nationalist Socialism. What's not to like?


171 posted on 01/13/2007 9:01:18 AM PST by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

are you challenging Woodward the Great??? how dare you? /s
:)


172 posted on 01/13/2007 9:03:57 AM PST by KOZ.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Worse than sour grapes... Envy and jealousy. Gerry Ford was a poor president relative to Reagan. He was lucky to be followed by the worst president of our lifetime.

So long, Gerry. Anything good that I thought about you will now be filed away and never brought back to see the light of day.


173 posted on 01/13/2007 9:08:18 AM PST by ReleaseTheHounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"It makes me very irritated when Reagan's people pound their chests and say that because we had this big military buildup, the Kremlin collapsed," Ford told The Grand Rapids Press.

As a closet globalist appeaser, it should.

174 posted on 01/13/2007 9:18:33 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The Grovelnator: fashionable fascism, one mirage at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
[Ford contended his own negotiation of the Helsinki accords on human rights did more to win the Cold War than Reagan's military buildup.]

Sure, he talked them out of the Cold War at Helsinki. ROFL!

Right - and next we'll hear that his WIN (Whip Inflation Now) lapel pins did more than Reagan's tax cuts to spur the economic recovery of the 80's.

175 posted on 01/13/2007 9:19:53 AM PST by awelliott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; onyx; Clemenza; Petronski; GummyIII; SevenofNine; veronica; Xenalyte; CheneyChick; Melas; ..

ping


176 posted on 01/13/2007 9:49:26 AM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Thanks for the ping.


177 posted on 01/13/2007 10:23:13 AM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
This is an insult to Warren Harding!!!

You're right! :)

178 posted on 01/13/2007 10:25:57 AM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Bringing some strength back to the dollar was part of Reaganism, not causing a severe recession.

Again, the former required the later. You cannot go from a loose money policy to a tight money policy without experiencing a temporary contraction/slowdown in the economy during the transition. You can't kill inflation, and build a basis for sound economic growth, without experiencing some pain. This was well understood by the "supply side" or "Austrian School" economists and understood and accepted by Reagan.

If you criticize Volker in this you can't avoid criticizing Reagan as well. There was distance between them on this policy.

179 posted on 01/13/2007 10:49:19 AM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

It must've been his refusal to meet Solzhenitsyn when he was expelled from the USSR that did the trick


180 posted on 01/13/2007 11:04:19 AM PST by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-267 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson