Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/28/2006 2:49:26 PM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Snickering Hound

Well...it was coming. A LONG TIME coming.

Good news.


2 posted on 12/28/2006 2:50:53 PM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound

About time.


3 posted on 12/28/2006 2:51:11 PM PST by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound

IMO, the most serious violation was concealing exculpatory evidence. Looks like somebody else is going to have to file on that one.


4 posted on 12/28/2006 2:52:17 PM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound

The sequel to Bonfires of The Vanities.


5 posted on 12/28/2006 2:52:39 PM PST by Jacquerie (Democrats soil institutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound

Disbarment gets my vote,since execution isnt an option.


6 posted on 12/28/2006 2:52:53 PM PST by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound

The AP is turning on Nifong as evidenced by the recharacterization of the woman's occupation from dancer to stripper.


7 posted on 12/28/2006 2:53:02 PM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound

Nothing about the DNA results in the entire article!



8 posted on 12/28/2006 2:53:41 PM PST by LibFreeOrDie (L'Chaim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound

There is more than that. He should be disbarred for deliberately trying to put innocent people in jail in order to further his career.


10 posted on 12/28/2006 2:54:31 PM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound

'bout time!

Now we need the federal equivalent filed against Fitzpatrick for the Plame "outing."

Both of these cases have wasted a ton of taxpayer dollars.


11 posted on 12/28/2006 2:54:32 PM PST by upchuck (How to win the WOT? Simple: set our rules of engagement to at least match those of our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound
"that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public comdemnation of the accuser."

They're upset with him for saying something AGAINST the accuser? Sheesh.

12 posted on 12/28/2006 2:55:10 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound

See also.......http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1759575/posts


14 posted on 12/28/2006 2:56:17 PM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo (Carry Daily. Apply Sparingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound

Similar thread

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1759575/posts


15 posted on 12/28/2006 2:56:27 PM PST by Domandred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound
the bar said it opened a case against Nifong in March 30,

Apparently, the Bar has been suspicious of Nifong's actions in this case since the beginning.
20 posted on 12/28/2006 3:00:06 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound

This one has more news in it than the earlier posts.

"In a statement, the bar said it opened a case against Nifong in March 30, a little more than two weeks after the party."

So, they have been proceeding quietly for some time. I would guess there are several reasons for making the proceeding public at this time. The most obvious is that Nifong was recently exposed as conspiring to conceal exculpator evidence from the defence and lying to the judge about it.

I also would guess that this might be added as an additional charge to the earlier ones. I don't know what the rules are in these proceedings, but presumably it would be possible to open additional charges as new discoveries are made.


22 posted on 12/28/2006 3:01:47 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound

He definitely deserves admonishment for those statements. He deserves disbarment for malicious prosecution.


25 posted on 12/28/2006 3:08:29 PM PST by MovementConservative (Known by love.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound

Whoops ... there goes yer' pension, Mikey ... and your freedom, and ... well ... that'll do ........ for starters.


26 posted on 12/28/2006 3:11:41 PM PST by knarf (Islamists kill each other ... News wall-to-wall, 24/7 .. don't touch that dial.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound
Disbarment should only be the beginning for this evil man. He (and the lying accuser) should be subject to the same penalties that the accused would have suffered if they had been convicted of these false crimes.
27 posted on 12/28/2006 3:13:44 PM PST by chesley ("Socialism" - compassion for those that don't have any.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound

I think the bar is giving a hint to the judge to file contempt charges against him for the DNA lies he told.


28 posted on 12/28/2006 3:21:46 PM PST by ArtyFO (I love to smoke cigars when I adjust artillery fire at the moonbat loonery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound

check the dna on the new baby. probably nifong, too.


29 posted on 12/28/2006 3:25:21 PM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound

The details of the complaint (pdf)
http://www.newsobserver.com/content/news/crime_safety/duke_lacrosse/20061229_nifong.pdf


30 posted on 12/28/2006 3:31:37 PM PST by ArtyFO (I love to smoke cigars when I adjust artillery fire at the moonbat loonery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson