1 posted on
12/17/2006 4:42:24 AM PST by
radar101
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: All
To: radar101
Tell em Newt.
The next President of the United States.
To: radar101
Any non-Muslim joking about a hijacking would have the book thrown at them. That is exactly what these six were doing. Gingrich is right.
If the government won't prosecute them cruminally, then US Air should file a civil suit for the cost of disruption. Keep these sonzabeeches so occupied defending themselves that they won't have time to think about trolling for another lawsuit.
4 posted on
12/17/2006 4:50:29 AM PST by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: radar101
"Those six people should have been arrested and prosecuted for pretending to be terrorists," Gingrich said. No Newt. They should have been arrested for Interfering With A Flight Crew.
That's a felony.
And how do you know they were pretending to be terrorists? That's a fact not yet in evidence.
L
5 posted on
12/17/2006 4:51:09 AM PST by
Lurker
(Historys most dangerous force is government and the crime syndicates that grow with it.)
To: radar101
Their suspicious behavior apparently consisted of reports that they had prayed in Arabic and that they were not sitting together but had walked around to talk to each other. Is this UPI or Al Jazeera? It is unreal the facts they left out.
They changed seats. They ordered seat belt extendeders for 170 lb men. They shouted "Allah" in the boarding area every time a passengers name was called. They discussed Al Queda and Saddam Hussein favorably--in English--for others to clearly hear them. They sat in different seats than the ones they were assigned, in an almost identical pattern to the 9/11 hijackers.
Are there Americans who work for UPI? Did they not see the towers fall on 9/11? Do they not understand that when they advocate for Islam, they are putting other Americans in danger?
7 posted on
12/17/2006 4:59:15 AM PST by
montag813
To: radar101
It's time that some serious laws passed against this nonsense, and security cameras installed to record such incidents.
14 posted on
12/17/2006 5:09:39 AM PST by
tkathy
(Sectarian violence? Or genocidal racists? Which is a better description of islamists?)
To: radar101
Newt is right. It was a well-thought out deliberate provocation. The only thing they didn't count on was the fact we're smarter than they are.
29 posted on
12/17/2006 5:47:22 AM PST by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: radar101
Why does the link under Republican in this sentence from the article, " Manchester Republican City Committee Christmas dinner", go to McCain's "Straight Talk" website?
31 posted on
12/17/2006 5:52:11 AM PST by
nuconvert
([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business] (...but his head is so tiny...))
To: radar101
"Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich told an audience in New Hampshire Muslim clerics pulled off a plane for praying should have been charged criminally." He is the man! And the next President of the USA!
36 posted on
12/17/2006 5:59:41 AM PST by
SeeSalt
To: radar101
The passengers need to start filing class action suits specifically against the perps like these six who intentionally disrupt flights.
39 posted on
12/17/2006 6:14:27 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: radar101
Imams should have been arrested Amen. (I said the same thing on a couple of the Flying Imams threads shortly after their stunt.)
ML/NJ
40 posted on
12/17/2006 6:25:58 AM PST by
ml/nj
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]
----------------------------
41 posted on
12/17/2006 6:31:19 AM PST by
SJackson
(had to move the national debate from whether to stay the course to how do we start down the path out)
To: radar101
44 posted on
12/17/2006 6:54:58 AM PST by
StoneWall Brigade
(Rick Santorum & Newt GingRich 08! Or whenever we want to get serious about Iran)
To: radar101
"Those six people should have been arrested and prosecuted for pretending to be terrorists," Gingrich said.We should have pretended to stuff them with pork and pretended to lock them up in a pig sty.
47 posted on
12/17/2006 7:04:15 AM PST by
EGPWS
To: radar101
If they are not citizens, they should be deported.
48 posted on
12/17/2006 7:06:43 AM PST by
etradervic
(Rumsfeld - the sack heard around the world)
To: radar101
The kooky attorney for the imams was on FOX the other day ranting that their behaviors on the plane were not suspicious and that the actions taken were simply racist profiling trying to take away their right to free speech. I wonder how he would feel about gun carrying people(with permits, nat) circling mosques and chanting allah is satan.
62 posted on
12/17/2006 8:52:43 AM PST by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: radar101
We might have to change that old saw that freedom of speech doesn't allow you to cry fire in a crowded movie theater to; "Freedom of speech doesn't alow you to cry "Allah" on a crowded airplane". - tom
69 posted on
12/17/2006 9:01:26 AM PST by
Capt. Tom
(Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb Republicans - Capt. Tom)
To: radar101
Forget arrested, they should have been deported.
To: radar101
AMEN. Going after the passengers for flagging the imams and airline employees for doing their jobs is crazy. Then again, that's what PC is anyway.
To: radar101
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson