Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is probably the same here
1 posted on 12/09/2006 3:40:42 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: Kaslin
"saying the paid telemarketers and door-knockers are actually performing good works because they educate the public as they ask for cash."

When you call me or knock on my door, I had better already know you personally... or else you have just made a life-long enemy, and I shall commit myself to exactly the opposite of whatever the hell you wanted when you decided to bother me in my home.

2 posted on 12/09/2006 3:49:08 PM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Hey, one has to travel and eat. There are all of the award dinners and banquets, too. All these too good groups have to pat themselves on the back with donation funds.
3 posted on 12/09/2006 3:49:20 PM PST by Bronzy ( How could the religion of peace hate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

A good idea gone bad, just like any other beaurocracy.


4 posted on 12/09/2006 3:50:26 PM PST by vpintheak (Yep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

That's why you should always ask for a charity's financial reports before making large donations. Believe me. MADD isn't the only one who spends a large percent on overhead.


5 posted on 12/09/2006 3:50:27 PM PST by CitizenUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
The CEO would not reveal his salary or that of other staff....

I'd bet it's mind-boggling.

6 posted on 12/09/2006 3:55:38 PM PST by GoldCountryRedneck ("Idiocy - Never under estimate the power of stupid people in large numbers" - despair.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Look for the interlocking relationships with the fundraising companies. I absolutely refuse to donate to any charity that uses a professional fundraiser. IMHO any group that does not spend at least 80% of their budget towards program expense should lose their charity designation and be considered a subsidiary of the professional fundraising company. Then hit them with a RICO violation.


7 posted on 12/09/2006 3:56:51 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Prayers for our patriot brother, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub. Brian, we're all pulling for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I only give to the library.... late fees.


8 posted on 12/09/2006 3:58:04 PM PST by Porterville (Fight without rules. Fight until only one side stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
It is long overdue for MADD to disband ! For the past few years, they have been pushing for and supporting police state type of laws like primary seat-belt enforcement and police checkpoints reminiscent of Nazi Germany off the top of my head !
9 posted on 12/09/2006 4:02:41 PM PST by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This is why charities get so little in donations esp politicians, isn't your mailbox chock full of gimme, gimme, gimme? This sounds like Jimmy Baker or united way ripoffs, how many more will it take? The only real charity is person to person, no middle men, no judas, skimming off 80%.


10 posted on 12/09/2006 4:05:31 PM PST by timer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
leaving only about 19 cents of each donor dollar for charitable works.

Likely to be more efficient than the UN.
11 posted on 12/09/2006 4:06:38 PM PST by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

"The real money is in the non-profits!"

Can't remember where I heard this, but it does seem to be true sometimes.


12 posted on 12/09/2006 4:10:29 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Since when is lobbying considered "charity"?


14 posted on 12/09/2006 4:14:42 PM PST by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Drinkers Against Mad Mothers (DAMM) spends its money right where it says it's going to: at the bar buying pitchers.


17 posted on 12/09/2006 4:20:19 PM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Every organism consumes all it can use before it wastes any.


27 posted on 12/09/2006 4:50:17 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

We used to donate every year to MADD. My husband started donating when he received a phone call. Therefore, they had his name, not mine. Therefore, when they called they asked for him. If he was not available they were so rude to me, that we stopped donating.


29 posted on 12/09/2006 5:07:40 PM PST by fishergirl (Proud mom of an Iraq war veteran - to all our veterans Thank You and God Bless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Sorry about the redundancy of "therefores". It's a good cause but MADD's callers were rude and quite uppity.


30 posted on 12/09/2006 5:10:04 PM PST by fishergirl (Proud mom of an Iraq war veteran - to all our veterans Thank You and God Bless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

There's good money to be made in looking out for the poor and the downtrodden.......


33 posted on 12/09/2006 9:04:38 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

We don't have these issues at DAMM: Drunks Against Mad Mothers.


34 posted on 12/09/2006 9:06:55 PM PST by Clemenza (I have such a raging clue!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
MADD chief executive officer Andrew Murie

Mothers... Andrew?

37 posted on 12/09/2006 9:30:55 PM PST by Rocky (Air America: Robbing the poor, and still unable to stay in business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Not necessarily.

I'm the ED of a not for profit professional organization, and I'm not rolling in big bucks. I make a great hourly wage, but only work part-time. For what my association needs and what I do (cause yes, I'm that damn good at it), they don't need to pay me full-time.

My philosophy has always been to do more with less, make it better by streamlining and cutting away waste. Invest as much as possible back into the organization. Control costs, control costs, control costs and host programs where the fee to attend is just a hair over what it took to put it together. I've never strong-armed anyone for sponsorship, never hunted down funds just to justify my salary, and never played footloose with the association's money.

You know what? We've grown almost 100% in membership, 150% in sponsorship, and 50% in new programs and services in just 3 years. Sponsors are lining up to support our organization because they like what we are doing and see value in it.

Organizations that have to hire paid professional fund raisers have lost their vision, are top heavy, and need a total revamping. We easily fit the 60% model - but dedicated leadership, a great Board of Directors, and a whole group of fantastic volunteers, make it possible!

44 posted on 12/09/2006 11:16:39 PM PST by TheWriterTX (Proud Retrosexual Wife of 13 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson