Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Remains of Apostle Paul May Have Been Found
Associated Press (excerpt) ^ | December 6, 2006

Posted on 12/06/2006 4:29:58 PM PST by HAL9000

Excerpt -

ROME (AP) - Vatican archaeologists have unearthed a sarcophagus believed to contain the remains of the Apostle Paul that had been buried beneath Rome's second largest basilica.

The sarcophagus, which dates back to at least A.D. 390, has been the subject of an extended excavation that began in 2002 and was completed last month, the project's head said this week.

~ snip ~


(Excerpt) Read more at christianpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: apostle; apostlepaul; archaeology; catholic; christianity; godsgravesglyphs; paul; relics; rome; saintpaul; stpaul; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 401-409 next last
To: what's up
(Clement of Rome, Mathetes, Polycarp, Ignatius of Antioch, Barnabas, Papias, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Andrew of Crete) --Oh, I like these guys. .. but their words are not to be taken as "gospel" but in the historical context in which they are said.

Right you are: their words are not "Gospel," but they do constitute our source for understanding what "THE Church" believed back in the first Christian Centuries when, like now, it was "fighting the good fight."

"none are "just," none are holy but God" --- This is in the unredeemed state. Joseph had faith so in the context is correctly deemed just...as was Abraham. Along with Mary.

Good as far as it goes.

But to go a little further, if you're willing to spend more time on this conversation: do you believe that Jesus had a defective, fallen human nature?

341 posted on 12/08/2006 12:17:38 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Ears perked...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis

"Orthodoxy is the truth that has been handed down to us."

Orthdoxy is just what the majority accept, true or not.


342 posted on 12/08/2006 12:24:31 PM PST by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: adiaireton8

"That is the heresy of Pelagianism, condemned in the Third Ecumenical Council at Ephesus in 431."

That is an opinion (and council) of men, one I reject. Original sin is a teaching that defies the justice of God. Do we imprison or punish people for the crimes of their parents? No, even mortal men know that is not justice.


343 posted on 12/08/2006 12:27:45 PM PST by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet
Then Mary didn't need her son as a Savior. Correct?

Depends on how you interpret the Scripture. Prior to the sacrifice of Jesus, everyone was tainted with the Original Sin. Therefore, Mary needed salvation despite never having committed a sin of her own.

344 posted on 12/08/2006 12:29:47 PM PST by Doohickey (I am not unappeasable. YOU are just too easily appeased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet

>>Why would God Incarnate have His perfection tarnished by being born to a sinful woman? I have never understood this argument.

Sorry. Too many interruptions while I was trying to type the earlier post. Let me re-phrase this question: Why would God Incarnate's perfection be tarnished by being born to a sinful woman? This is what I don't understand.


345 posted on 12/08/2006 12:30:32 PM PST by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: Tokra
the apostles concluded that the body was taken up into heaven

WHAT? Is that how this started? Oh, that's funny! I hold the apostles in the highest esteem, but hearsay about their deductive reasoning does not cut it for theological debates.

I have been given the promise and guarantee that the scriptures are the inerrant word of God. I have no promise or guarantee that the apostles always spoke truth and neither do I have any promise or guarantee that hearsay stories about the apostles are true.

This is the same reason that I don't pray to the saints. I have been given no promise or guarantee that they can or will listen.

346 posted on 12/08/2006 12:38:48 PM PST by Tao Yin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Ah, I forget Luke 1:46-55 is referred to as such. The phrase, "God my savior" would not have been uncommon in the Jewish world of that age or before (see Job 19:25-26). Mary saying this may reflect a saving faith - but only God knows for sure. Same as only He knows the heart of anyone.


347 posted on 12/08/2006 12:45:12 PM PST by Manfred the Wonder Dawg (Test ALL things, hold to that which is True.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
our source for understanding what "THE Church" believed back in the first Christian Centuries when, like now, it was "fighting the good fight."

Of course. Much of what they say is extrememly valuable as is true of any historical document.

However, when they contradict the scriptures and their clear meaning, that is when we must consider their statements false.

348 posted on 12/08/2006 1:14:36 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: paulat

If she did not need her Son as a Saviour, why did she call him that?


349 posted on 12/08/2006 2:15:29 PM PST by Mom MD (The scorn of fools is music to the ears of the wise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD
If she did not need her Son as a Saviour, why did she call him that?

Like I said...I am not a theologial student.

I was just trying to parse things out logically.

350 posted on 12/08/2006 2:18:40 PM PST by paulat (about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
do you believe that Jesus had a defective, fallen human nature?

I think Jesus took on a humanity of being as much as he could be tempted. Why would Satan bother, otherwise?

351 posted on 12/08/2006 2:21:13 PM PST by paulat (about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: woollyone
Sorry. Hmm. I guess I messed up that link to Amy Welborn's account of the tour of rhe "Scavi": the excavations of St. Peter's burial place in Rome.

Try this cut-and-paste:

http://amywelborn.typepad.com/openbook/2006/03/scavi.html

352 posted on 12/08/2006 2:25:36 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Ears perked...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD
If she did not need her Son as a Saviour, why did she call him that?

I just went back and pulled out my St. James.

I think it goes back to the Catholic interpretation of the Trinity.

I think, in her mind, "God, the Father" was the Saviour for bringing her "God, the Son." I think that's the case, because the Son had not yet lived out his destiny.

I've never been able to wrap my mind around who "God, the Holy Spirit" is.

It's the age-old dilemma. Who is "I am Who am"?

Far greater minds than mine have thought about this.

353 posted on 12/08/2006 2:28:43 PM PST by paulat (about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

bump for later reading


354 posted on 12/08/2006 2:41:14 PM PST by oldfart (The most dangerous man is the one who has nothing left to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up
"However, when they [the early Fathers]contradict the scriptures and their clear meaning, that is when we must consider their statements false."

I understand your postion. However the "clear meaning" of Scripture is often a matter of dispute. Then the question is: how do you determine the meaning of Scripture?

The usual rule of thumb is:


355 posted on 12/08/2006 2:54:37 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("The Church is the pillar and foundation of the Truth." 1 Timothy 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: paulat
"I think Jesus took on a humanity of being as much as he could be tempted. Why would Satan bother, otherwise?"

True. But even a human being with an un-fallen nature --- I'm thinking, Adam and Eve in Paradise before the Fall --- could be tempted.

So let me re-phrase the question: do you think Jesus' human nature was that of Adam and Eve in Paradise before the Fall, in other words, pure and perfect in a creaturely sense --or-- did He have, like the rest of us, a degraded human nature as a result of the inherited consequences of sin, which darkened the human intellect, weakened our will, and deranged our appetites?

356 posted on 12/08/2006 3:06:43 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
So let me re-phrase the question: do you think Jesus' human nature was that of Adam and Eve in Paradise before the Fall, in other words, pure and perfect in a creaturely sense --or-- did He have, like the rest of us, a degraded human nature as a result of the inherited consequences of sin, which darkened the human intellect, weakened our will, and deranged our appetites?

Just thinking out-loud...I think he had the human nature of Adam and Eve...it would make wonderful theological sense. He would put himself in the position of having to make the Ultimate First Decision.

357 posted on 12/08/2006 3:16:03 PM PST by paulat (about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
However the "clear meaning" of Scripture is often a matter of dispute

Often. However, a doctrine such as the sinfulness of created man is a fairly easy one to ascertain throughout scripture.

If you let Scripture interpret Scripture on that point there should be very little confusion.

358 posted on 12/08/2006 3:46:35 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: paulat
Just thinking out-loud...I think he had the human nature of Adam and Eve...it would make wonderful theological sense. He would put himself in the position of having to make the Ultimate First Decision.

That's what I'm thinking, too. I admit I'm just groping around here, because I don't know the full implications, but it seems to me that that's why St. Paul identifies Jesus as a kind of "second Adam":

Romans 5:14
Adam [is] a type of Him who was to come.

1 Corinthians 15:22
For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive.

1 Corinthians 15:45
So also it is written, "The first Man, Adam, was made a living soul." The last Adam was made a life-giving spirit.

I'm not sure exactly where I'm going with this, but think of this: Jesus has only one human parent -- His mother--- from whom He derived His humanity. He had no human father. So from a genetic point of view, everything human that was heritable, came from her.

She's an XX, and Jesus as a male had to be an XY, so I don't know how that works out. But it seems to follow that if Jesus' human nature was pure and perfect in the creaturely sense --- nothing in his nature or nurture as a human was darkened, weakened, bleared, smeared or disordered --- that tells you something about his mother.

359 posted on 12/08/2006 4:01:20 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Thinking out loud...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: what's up
Question: was Jesus' human nature "sinful"?

(If you check out recent posts in this thread with FReeper paulat (341, 351, 356, etc), that's what we're discussing, too, if you want to comment.)

360 posted on 12/08/2006 4:05:46 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (He was born of the Virgin Mary, and became Man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 401-409 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson