Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HOA Rule Forbids Couple To Smoke In Their Own Home Judge Upholds Homeowners' Association Order
TheDenverChannel.com ^ | 11/16/06 | TheDenverChannel.com

Posted on 11/17/2006 10:46:11 AM PST by TheKidster

GOLDEN, Colo. -- A judge has upheld a homeowners association's order barring a couple from smoking in the town house they own.

Colleen and Rodger Sauve, both smokers, filed a lawsuit in March after their condominium association amended its bylaws last December to prohibit smoking.

"We argued that the HOA was not being reasonable in restricting smoking in our own unit, nowhere on the premises, not in the parking lot or on our patio," Colleen Sauve said. The Heritage Hills #1 Condominium Owners Association was responding to complaints from the Sauves' neighbors who said cigarette smoke was seeping into their units, representing a nuisance to others in the building.

In a Nov. 7 ruling, Jefferson County District Judge Lily Oeffler ruled the association can keep the couple from smoking in their own home.

Oeffler stated "smoke and/or smoke smell" is not contained to one area and that smoke smell "constitutes a nuisance." She noted that under condo declarations, nuisances are not allowed.

The couple now has to light up on the street in front of their condominium building.

"I think it's ridiculous. If there's another blizzard, I'm going to be having to stand out on the street, smoking a cigarette," said Colleen Suave.

For five years the couple has smoked in their living room and that had neighbors fuming.

"At times, it smells like someone is sitting in the room with you, smoking. So yes, it's very heavy," said condo owner Christine Shedron.

The Sauves said they have tried to seal their unit. One tenant spent thousands of dollars trying to minimize the odor.

"We got complaints and we felt like it was necessary to protect our tenants and our investment," said Shedron.

The Suaves said they would like to appeal the judge's ruling but are unsure if they have the money to continue fighting. They said what goes on behind their closed doors shouldn't be other people's business.

"I don't understand. If I was here and I was doing a lawful act in my home when they got here, why can they say, 'OK, now you have to change,'" said Colleen Suave. "We're not arguing the right to smoke as much as we're arguing the right to privacy in our home."

Other homeowners believe, as with loud music, that the rights of a community trump the rights of individual residents. The HOA is also concerned that tenants will sue those homeowners for exposure to second-hand smoke and this could be a liability issue.

The couple said that they would like to unload their condo and get out of the HOA entirely, but they are not sure if the real estate market is right.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: readthecontract; smoking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 761-776 next last
To: Gabz

lol! :)


421 posted on 11/17/2006 5:47:05 PM PST by leda (Life is always what you make it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

My son worked for a guy who sold security doors and windows; one day a guy called and asked if he had the company selling "do-it-yourself prison kits" and my son blithely answered, "Yes!"


422 posted on 11/17/2006 5:48:09 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Hey, they will be calling you names soon.

I have the sense I am dealing with teenagers.


423 posted on 11/17/2006 5:48:35 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]

To: TheKidster

;)


424 posted on 11/17/2006 5:49:49 PM PST by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies]

To: been_lurking

Well, the govt is dealing with automobiles and emissions.


425 posted on 11/17/2006 5:50:06 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

I thought you would understand, I'm on your side in this argument based on logic but you don't see that logic is wasted on the helplessly dependent.

HOAs are ostriches burrowing for higher ground.


426 posted on 11/17/2006 5:50:34 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

They cannot forclose or kick people out.

They can by voting to impose a fine of say $1,000 per day. Then when a month or two goes by they sue and forclose.

Again, if you agreed to that upfront, fine. I think it is a bad decision but definitely not the end of the world. The problem comes when you are the target of a personal vandetta and these tactics are used against you to make you pay for a personal grudge. If there are enough people in the clique then the rules start to change specifically to target the percieved enemy. Thank GOD this hasn't happened to you but it could if you piss off the right nosey old busy body.

As far as smoking goes, outside in the open air or in your own home are completely acceptable. You breathe more harmful substances when you clean your bathroom than when a guy next to you lights up for 5 minutes.
Smokers should be considerate and not smoke in a dense crowd or around a bunch of kids. Also, a simlple "do you mind that smoke is bothering me" is a lot more reasonable than leveraging the force of government to ban the use of a legal and heavily taxed product.


427 posted on 11/17/2006 5:52:01 PM PST by TheKidster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
"Totally non-carcinogenic, it is a potent oxidizer and a mild lung irritant."
 
 
Doesn't cause cataracts in sheep either according to ...some...
 
Following sheep over the edge
 
http://www.sepp.org/key%20issues/ozone/sheep.html
 
 

428 posted on 11/17/2006 5:52:22 PM PST by Radix (This Tag Line would be a better joke about John Kerry if I hadn't left out 2 words and mangled it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

Sorry, it's been a long day, and the illogic I am reading here is fogging the brain!!!

In fact I think I will call it a night and pick this up in the morning........maybe.


429 posted on 11/17/2006 5:53:27 PM PST by Gabz (If we weren't crazy, we'd just all go insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: GretchenM

You sold me, pass the Chaw!


430 posted on 11/17/2006 5:53:44 PM PST by TheKidster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
You know, Prof, your argument is self-defeting.

I is carcinogenic precisely because it is so reacitive.

Don't believe me? Go straddle a nuke.

431 posted on 11/17/2006 5:55:19 PM PST by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

i'm not talking about non zoning laws. i'm talking about your obvious sense of superiority based on the price of your house.


432 posted on 11/17/2006 5:55:42 PM PST by TheKidster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]

To: TheKidster

HOA/s cannot impose fines. All they can do is go to court and ask a judge to enforce the rules.

The smoking issue started with the HOA changing the rules because the building leaked smoke from one apt to another. Someone said "call the builder",,,that doesn't happen when you live in an old building. The owner are the condo association and apparently the expense of smoke proofing apartments must have precluded doing it.

The assumption that HOA's are used for "biddies" and "vendettas" is alien to me. I have for 35 years lived in areas with HOA'a and have never seen that. The only power they have are enforcing rules and that is hard, I have seen it go on for years before something is corrected.


433 posted on 11/17/2006 5:56:03 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: Radix

I was going to ask what your plans were after grade school but I went to your homepage and read your thumbnail; I guess you are just having a bit of fun.


434 posted on 11/17/2006 5:56:28 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
There is no such thing as pure O3; and one would need an enclosed chamber to attain such a level with a half-life measured in seconds. Get outside yourself and into a physics book.

Its a joke, OP. You know: lab rats, exposed to massive levels of substance X not to be found in nature, get cancer, so we must ban substance X! Help, Help, call the class action lawyers!

435 posted on 11/17/2006 5:56:46 PM PST by LexBaird (98% satisfaction guaranteed. There's just no pleasing some people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: TheKidster

People should not be proud that they got a nice house and had the means to pay for it???

It is a superior achievement to work and earn a living, get promoted, get raises, invest wisely and buy a big house. One should feel prettty damn good about that.

Kid,,you are a commie I do believe.


436 posted on 11/17/2006 5:58:34 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
Well, my house is worth $6-8 hundred thousand, depending.

May I smoke?

437 posted on 11/17/2006 6:05:04 PM PST by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Two points:

The article states the condo HOA AMMENDED their regulations, in include smoking WITHIN the units. These owners never signed up for that.

Secondly, ALL condominiums, townhouses and almost all new suburban homes now have home owner associations. Many times too, these organizations (as in this case) act as little dictators....

I would continue to fight this--how any organization can tell you you cannot do a legal act inside the walls of your own home is beyond me.

I would smoke in the house anyway...and make them get a warrent to search the place (unlikely) to prove it.


438 posted on 11/17/2006 6:06:35 PM PST by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheKidster

The only person who thinks I feel superior about my house is you.

Pretty telling, IMO.


439 posted on 11/17/2006 6:08:12 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: NathanR; eXe

I'm on an HOA board. We do not create CC&R restrictions after the fact. It's possible, but it would take a board full of snobs and 75% approval. Neither of which are likely.


440 posted on 11/17/2006 6:08:33 PM PST by Niteranger68 (Big winners of election 2006: Democrats, terrorists, MSM, Hollywood, anti-war protestors, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 761-776 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson