Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deliver a Spanking
The Pittsburgh Tribune Review ^ | October 22, 2006 | Colin McNickle

Posted on 10/22/2006 8:49:20 AM PDT by Conservative Goddess

I am your typical Republican "supervoter." .... But I'm seriously considering ending that streak this Nov. 7. ...

I'm also a contrarian -- a conservative with libertarian leanings. Combine all these characteristics, then mix in the aggregate Republican record, allow the ire it has created to rise and bake it for a few years and here's what comes out of the oven:

A party base that's mad as hell and no longer willing to rationalize GOP failures. It's a base whose crust grows darker and thicker -- i.e., angrier -- when prominent conservatives and Republicans -- politicians, pundits, radio talk-show hosts and think tankers sensing impending electoral doom -- pop out of their pumpkins and upbraid the watered-on for complaining about being wet.

....

...Pay no attention to the recidivists behind the curtain who, once every two years or four or six, make grand promises of fealty to conservative and party principles only to repeatedly fail to deliver. ... What's the definition of insanity again? In this case it's constantly returning Republicans to power and having the audacity to expect different results. And what could be more stupid than that?

....

Look, folks, it's time to take a stand. Returning this current crew of Republicans to power will only embolden them to spend more time, not less, off the conservative reservation. This is no time to dance the Rationalization Rumba. It is time for the GOP base to deliver a very big SMACK. It's the only way to start the process of true Republican/conservative reclamation.

Fellow Republicans and conservatives, do what you must on Nov. 7. But I, for one, refuse to yet again enter my polling place, vote for the usual GOP suspects...

It's time for the long-spanked to do some spanking.

(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: demoralization; dramaqueens; dutroll; headuprear; insanedefeatism; lesbianinsanity; redbottoms; spankme; takemyballandgohome; votegop; votesuppression
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 641-656 next last
To: kesg

I will not participate in this Oprah-like "spanking" drama, my SMACK is going towards our enemies, the DNC/MSM.


81 posted on 10/22/2006 9:38:59 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Conservative Goddess
Who's the "WE"....she must be carring a RAT in her pocket?
82 posted on 10/22/2006 9:39:02 AM PDT by RasterMaster (Winning Islamic hearts and minds.........one bullet at a time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Goddess
Oh Yes! Let's trade the GOP's wooden paddle for the Democrat's spiked club!!!
In case this guy was taking a long spring nap, he must have missed PA conservatives tossing 16 of their RINO incumbents in the primaries for more conservative representation. You CLEAN HOUSE IN THE PRIMARIES, AND THEN YOU MAKE THE BEST WITH THE TEAM YOU'VE GOT UNTIL THE NEXT PRIMARIES. Geesh. Even Little Leaguers understand this elememtary concept.

I'll breathlessly await the counterpart article that tells Democrats to "teach their leadership a lesson" by voting Republican.

83 posted on 10/22/2006 9:39:09 AM PDT by Sisku Hanne (*Support DIANA IREY for US Congress!* Send "Cut-n-Run" Murtha packing: HIT THE ROAD, JACK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Goddess

The time to teach a lesson is in the primaries. Stupid voter...


84 posted on 10/22/2006 9:39:32 AM PDT by djl_sa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Goddess

YEAH! Let's allow the pro-abortion, anti-gun, pro-gay marriage, terrorist appeasing, tax raising, open borders, big government Democrats run the show for a few decades. That'll teach those wascally Webuplicans a lesson they'll never forget!


85 posted on 10/22/2006 9:40:09 AM PDT by Redcloak (Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impeach the Boy

You know most of the people spouting this drivel never supported the GOP or Bush; and they come back every election cycle to post crap just like this.


86 posted on 10/22/2006 9:40:43 AM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: submarinerswife

Exactly!

The "I'm a Republican but..." contingent! Sure.


87 posted on 10/22/2006 9:41:46 AM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Goddess

You know what cracks me up about all this?

If we lose the House, Republicans are going to think they have to be MORE moderate and when they run again, it will be from a left of center position.

So freepers and voters who think it's wise to deliver a lesson and not vote are just plain naive.


88 posted on 10/22/2006 9:42:35 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Goddess

While a Democrat controlled Congress seething with hatred for Bush might consume all of its time crafting an impeachment, I'm worried about other consequences. The cut and run crowd will do everything it can to withdraw forces from Iraq, largely by defunding the war. This will leave our service men and women unequipped and more vulnerable to the insurgents. This cut and run will also embolden Islamic fascists worldwide and I think would be a prelude to more 9-11 size attacks on US soil.


89 posted on 10/22/2006 9:43:05 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster

This does not reduce the size and scope of the federal government. It may make it easier to know how the size and scope of the federal government is growing, but it reduces nothing.

The Republicans only slow the growth but they do not reduce it, and you can't point to any evidence that they do.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,108066,00.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9307-2005Feb8.html

http://www.mises.org/freemarket_detail.asp?control=479&sortorder=articledate

http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/05/01/david-frum/republicans-and-the-flight-of-opportunity/

The Republicans have squandered opportunity after opportunity in their domestic agenda. As a party, they are not interested in shrinking federal authority.


90 posted on 10/22/2006 9:43:19 AM PDT by SittinYonder (Ic þæt gehate, þæt ic heonon nelle fleon fotes trym, ac wille furðor gan,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano
This whole approach by cut and run "conservatives" is insanity.

It's saying to Repubs "I'm not voting for you, but my not voting will by default enable DemocRATS to win the election

WHO HAVE OBSTRUCTED OUR AGENDA OF COURT APPOINTMENTS,

WHO WILL RAISE OUR TAXES,

WHO HAVE SOLD OUT OUR NATIONAL SECURITY WITH LEAKS,

WHO HAVE PUSHED FOR THEIR AL QUEDA BILL OF RIGHTS,

WHO HAVE SOUGHT TO CRIMINALIZE CONSERVATISM WITH TRUMPED UP CHARGES...

ETC. ETC. ETC.

Absolutely. I was one of the very angry conservatives when the Senate, in its infinate wisdom, chose to vote in favor of amnesty for illegals. I spoke strongly against the move, and I questioned why we would bother supporting a party that chose to invite 15 million future liberal voters to stay in the country. Add in the excessive spending on the part of our Republicans and the result was me being a very disgruntled voter.

But then I took some time to think about the issues - all the issues.

Consider the next appointment or two to the supreme court.

Consider two years of needless impeachment hearings.

Consider re-enactment of the "fairness" doctrine, whose only result would be silencing of the few remaining conservative voices (and we know by the persecution of Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter that the dems want them silenced).

Consider the re-enactment of the assault weapons bill, along with some additional gun control bills used to further restrict the second amendment (and consider the purpose of the second amendment).

Consider how the tax cuts will expire, and would likely be replaced by tax cuts for those that already pay little or no federal income tax.

Consider drastic expansion of the socialism that democrats support.

Consider federalized health care.

Consider "means-testing" for social security recipients so that any remaining connection between "paid in" and "collected" is permanently severed.

Consider cutting and running from Iraq, thus presenting to the world another defeat for America, and a defeat for freedom in the middle east. That would certainly embolden our enemies.

I'm sure I've missed plenty of the leftist's pet ideas, but I will say that all things considered, there is no reason to let the democrats win in any election this year. No reason at all.

There may be a need for spanking of many Republicans, but there's no reason whatsoever to spank the entire country. I'll be voting "R" on November 7th, and if you consider all the issues at stake, you should do the same.

91 posted on 10/22/2006 9:43:29 AM PDT by meyer (A vote for amnesty is a vote against America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Joe Bfstplk
You're at the wrong web site, pal.

This web site is supporting the Rs this year.

92 posted on 10/22/2006 9:44:01 AM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ghostrider

excellent post


93 posted on 10/22/2006 9:44:35 AM PDT by Boxsford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
If you are a malcontent conservative, then stay at home

We've won without them before in 2000 and 2002 and 2004.

I suspect that's what all the whining is about.

94 posted on 10/22/2006 9:45:07 AM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Goddess

So it's "Cut-off-nose-to-spite-face Time?"

How is "Speaker Pelosi" going to help the COnservative cause


95 posted on 10/22/2006 9:45:09 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker

Amen. A few weeks ago, I was with a liberal friend of mine who's normally very nice and approachable when he doesn't talk about politics, and he actually said that he thinks if the Republicans win these elections, America will become a police state. The fact that I greatly value his friendship was the only thing that kept me from laughing out loud when he said that. I think he's watched 'V for Vendetta' a few too many times. I'll be voting GOP, without a doubt.


96 posted on 10/22/2006 9:45:31 AM PDT by Chewie84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Goddess
Well, I'm here in your neighboring state of Ohio. You think politics suck for you? We've got the GOP who have all but destroyed this state with tax hikes. Our governor was indicted on ethics violations and didn't have the decency to step down. Bob Ney was just pleaded guilty for his dealings with Abramoff so the GOP isn't very popular here.

We do have a genuine conservative running for governor, J. Kenneth Blackwell, but, if the polls are correct, people who think like you in my state, want to punish the GOP and elect Ted Strickland, a man who will raise taxes even more most likely to pay for his "pie-in-the-sky" programs and (as evidenced in how he ran his own campaign office some years ago and his vote in the House in 1999) most likely be soft on sexual predators!

Ken Blackwell has been Ohio's son for years, devoting his life to public office and doing Ohio some good. Again, if the polls are right, he may not even save Ohio because of stupid idiots not wanting to make the distintion that he is NOT Bob Taft! He could be punished because of the very person whose policies he campaigned AGAINST! This is what happens when those who want to "punish" the GOP get so myopic, that all they see is "GOP" AND IT MUST BE SPANKED!

So, excuse me if I don't jump on this bandwagon of "punishing the GOP". I MAY get to see this type of "cutting off the nose to spite the face" mess up close and personal in my state.

97 posted on 10/22/2006 9:45:52 AM PDT by Sister_T (Conservative Bloggers are "Undocumented Journalists" ... doing the job "real journalists" won't do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: smokeyb
"I hear Hillary is changing parties. Are you still sticking with that?"

I have a very strong hunch that Hillary will run as an independent. She'll try to do what Joe Lieberman is doing and start scolding out democrats.

This could especially happen after Al Gore wins the dem nomination.

98 posted on 10/22/2006 9:46:49 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster; Conservative Goddess; Badray
Who's the "WE"....

She and her buddy have been pushing this crap as long as I can remember.

Alas, Badray is "absent" today.

99 posted on 10/22/2006 9:47:18 AM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder
the WOT trumps everything.

Put the Democrats in congress and the senate and we're done in Iraq.

Which is even one more reason to question the current Republican candidates who have deserted the conservative cause.

Today on Fox Joe Biden, of all people, confided that at least three Republican Senators promised him that they will come out AFTER the election to condemn the war in Iraq. Add them to the Hagels and Chaffees and Snowes and Lugars and Warners and McCains and it looks like the same people who backstabbed America on illegal immigration will now do it on the war.

100 posted on 10/22/2006 9:48:42 AM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 641-656 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson