Posted on 10/19/2006 6:53:02 AM PDT by slowhand520
The Maverick!
Well said. The homosexual abomination that pervades our society cannot stand and must be addressed politically since medicine and psychology have caved in to the sodomites. I am not sure the traditional spiritual advisors are capable of helping to cure them any more. They are too involved in this sick practice themselves and seem to be unwilling to purge themselves of it...and are more interested in hiding or excusing.
Cross McLame off any presidential hopeful list...
Too short and clearly edited..I'd like to see more..he never said it should be sanctioned by society or recognized legally
He just can't help himself from stepping in it, can he? Oh yeah, we really want him as a president./s
He must've decided, then, he didn't have a chance in hell of getting to be President. If he STILL thinks he can become President after saying that, it really puts the period on "McCain is insane." Didn't he pay attention to the homo/marriage votes in the last election? Duh. DUH.
Yet, he's made me happy for a change. Buh-BYE, McLame!
"Having 2-3% of the population redefining words at will leads us quickly in to Humpty-Dumpty land:"
Article VII. Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity and happiness of the people; "and not for the profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men: " Therefore the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity and happiness require it.
Hey McCain. It has been shot down by voters everywhere it's been on the ballot. Do you still believe it? Or should you get to say what should be legal even if the voters have spoken?
McCain is his own worst enemy. Every time he opens his mouth the slams another nail into his Presidential coffin. His Presidential hopes will be dead and buried long before the 2008 election!
Thank you Johnny for having no chance in the Republican primary. All we need is for Rudy to make the same statement and we can finally narrow down the nominees.
This is why the GOP is ready to suffer massive losses in Congress -- because this RINO is essentially running the Senate.
He did not say this. He let it be known loud and clear he was aganist gay marriage. Do not let edidted video fool you. I say this myself.
If McCain takes a run for the Presidency, all his opponents have to do is have this clip played all over the internet. This is his nail. Conservative (where are they?) democrats or moderates do not favor homosexual marriage anymore than conservative Republicans. The guy will never make it trying to double-speak - unless he's appealing to idiots!
Same-sex marriages are not inevitable. Then we have the problem of multiple marriages, marriages to just get benefits, incest, child-marriages, marriages to a dead person or to a pet that are bound to follow.
I do not agree that they should be endowed with government benefits. That is just a heart string pulling method they are using to get people to eventually agree to their marriage and that their relationships are just like hetersexual relationships. Of coarse I do not think government should favor married couples of either type. I think government should stay out of social engineering. If we followed the constitution there would be no way they could redistribute wealth to certain groups. I can not believe people fall for this crap.
Ack - I'm running out the door, if wag hasn't pinged it out I will upon my return.
What a fool/knave he is.
Thank you for the follow up, it sounded in the clip like McCain was going to clarify that statement.
I can't stand McCain, but fair is fair.
I got it already.
Why don't we see what happens when this is taken to its logical extreme?
I am personally opposed to homosexuality bestiality in any form. That being said, homosexuality bestiality does exist and I do not believe that homosexual Beastial partners should be legally excluded from certain financial and civil benefits that married couples enjoy.
I am personally opposed to homosexuality inscest in any form. That being said, homosexuality incest does exist and I do not believe that homosexual incestual partners should be legally excluded from certain financial and civil benefits that married couples enjoy.
I am personally opposed to homosexuality polygamy in any form. That being said, homosexuality ploygamy does exist and I do not believe that homosexual polygamous partners should be legally excluded from certain financial and civil benefits that married couples enjoy.
There is a sound reason to promote marriage between one man and one woman. The stability of the family unit is imperative to the health and welfare of our society. The marriage institution should be preserved and promoted. Promoting alternative lifestyles will negatively alter the framework of our republic.
As it is right now homosexuals are free to marry. But they must marry someone of the opposite sex, they are free to marry only one person of the opposite sex, and they are not free to marry someone from their immediate family or a dog or a dead person.
I agree with your extremes, and you are right that some might try to argue those positions; however, I am not one of them. I am not an advocate of homosexual marriage, nor will I ever be. Still, I am interested, what civil/financial rights do you think homosexual couples should be entitled to (if any)?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.