Posted on 09/24/2006 2:07:59 PM PDT by blogblogginaway
Thought it would be a good idea to discuss the upcoming interview where we already know Clinton loses it with Wallacae here. I for one am anxious to see it.
During Clintoon's ranting and raving and shouting down Chris Wallace about how the right wing is out to get him, I thought I heard someone in the background say "Oh, man!"
For me, the socks said it all.
He was lying. When the important time came, he was no where to be found to give the order.
Good point!
And Richard Clarke was the ONLY person fighting terrorism, you know. I'm sure that will come as a surprise to hundreds of people in the CIA and FBI, for starters.
I would not let my children around Clinton.
This guy is such a loser, and I echo Dan Burton's famous word: SCUMBAG!
"clintoon does nothing without ulterior motives. Ever."
That is an excellent point. With the Clintons, what you will can ALWAYS expect that what ever move they make is well planned out, completely thought through, and timed to have the maximum political effect. Never underestimate them. Having said that, I do think that this POS former president and national disgrace did lose his self-control as he ranted and raved about "the raht-wangers."
Look at his face when Chris thanks him at the end of the interview.
This man is one whacked out paranoid freak.
Here we go Bubba, now contradict what you got so blasted mad about in the first part of the interview. He KNOWS the reason the dems have been hurt so badly in the past 3 elections, is because of his own TERRIBLE LEGACY on national security.
Of course. That's the hallmark of liberal Democrats.
The transcript doesn't reflect something.
At this point (early in the interview)
WALLACE: So what is it that you can do as a former president?CLINTON: So what you can do as a former president is — you don't have the wide range of power, so you have to concentrate on fewer things. But you are less at the mercy of unfolding events.
So if I say, look, we're going to work on the economic empowerment of poor people, on fighting AIDS and other diseases, on trying to bridge the religious and political differences between people, and on trying to, you know, avoid the worst calamities of climate change and help to revitalize the economy in the process, I can actually do that.
I mean, because tomorrow when I get up, if there's a bad headline in the paper, it's President Bush's responsibility, not mine. That's the joy of being a former president. And it is true that if you live long enough and you really have great discipline in the way you do this, like this CGI, you might be able to affect as many lives, or more, for the good as you did as president.
The bolded portion, instead of 'responsibility', Clinton started to say 'fault'. My son and I both heard 'fau' before he corrected himself.
Sure. And Bush is stupid.
I think what happened re: his socks is that he did so much moving around and half jumping out of his chair his pants have moved way up his leg. But ya think'd he would have fixed it!
Does anyone wonder if he lost some of his touch after his health problems?
Between this and the Path to 9/11 gaffe seriously makes me wonder. In both cases, he's made himself look like a big jerk and I can't decide if the issue is that the mainstream media doesn't have the kind of power they did 8 years ago to cover for him or if it's that he's just not as quick on his feet as he used to be.
Once again, you would never see Bush or Condi or Cheney completely lose their cool in an interview like this with, say, Dan Rather or Katie Couric.
Fox is loving the controversy over this interview. They were plugging it on Fox Radio newsbreaks all day today.
Rush is going to have a field day tomorrow!
I couldn't watch more that the first segment!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.