Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US threatened to bomb Pakistan 'back to stone age' after 9/11: Musharraf (threat Armitage)
breitbart.com ^ | sept., 21, 2006 | breitbart

Posted on 09/21/2006 1:10:50 PM PDT by blogblogginaway

The United States threatened to bomb Pakistan "back to the stone age" unless it cooperated in the US-led war on terror, President Pervez Musharraf said in an interview. Musharraf, whose support for the US-led invasion of Afghanistan was instrumental in the fall of the hardline Taliban regime after the September 11, 2001 attacks, said the threat came from former deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage.

"The intelligence director told me that (Armitage) said, 'Be prepared to be bombed. Be prepared to go back to the stone age'," Musharraf said in the interview with the 60 minutes investigative news programme to be broadcast Sunday.

Musharraf says the threat was delivered to his intelligence director, according to selected transcripts of the interview released by the CBS television network.

"I think it was a very rude remark," Musharraf says in the interview. "One has to think and take actions in the interests of the nation, and that's what I did."

Shortly after the September 11 attacks, Pakistan abandoned its support for the Taliban, which was sheltering Al-Qaeda leaders, and became a front-line ally in the US-led "war on terror."

Pakistan has arrested several senior Al-Qaeda members including Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, the alleged mastermind of the 2001 attacks.

The South Asian country has also deployed around 80,000 troops at the rugged frontier with Afghanistan to hunt pro-Taliban and Al-Qaeda linked militants who sneaked into the area after fleeing the US-led invasion of Afghanistan.

The alleged threat also demanded that Pakistan turn over border posts and bases for the US military to use in the war against the Taliban, which ended with the hardline regime's collapse in late 2001.

Other "ludicrous" demands required Pakistan to suppress domestic expressions of support for militant attacks on US targets, according to CBS.

"If somebody's expressing views, we cannot curb the expression of views," it quoted Musharraf as saying.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armitage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 09/21/2006 1:10:51 PM PDT by blogblogginaway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

The United States threatened to bomb Pakistan "back to the stone age" unless it cooperated in the US-led war on terror

___________________________________________


Iran might want to chat with you.


2 posted on 09/21/2006 1:14:34 PM PDT by MadeInAmerica (- If ILLEGAL means Undocumented - Then Breaking and Entering means Unannounced Visit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Well, props to Armitage on that one, then.


3 posted on 09/21/2006 1:14:35 PM PDT by Dracian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
Exposing "covert" CIA agents and threatening to bomb other nations.

Aren't Cheney and Rove supposed to be doing these things? ;^)

4 posted on 09/21/2006 1:16:09 PM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Absolutely ludicrous, indeed.

Pakistan would never think of curtailing free speech.


5 posted on 09/21/2006 1:16:13 PM PDT by Rumierules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Who knows. We still might.


6 posted on 09/21/2006 1:16:34 PM PDT by RedCell ("...thou shalt kill thine enemy before he killeth you by any means available" - Dick Marcinko)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

"If somebody's expressing views, we cannot curb the expression of views," it quoted Musharraf as saying."

They certainly can supress expressions of views they
don't approve of, such as support for Ms Bhutto, or
Christianity..


7 posted on 09/21/2006 1:17:55 PM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

He would have to bomb them to the Neo-Neolithic Age.


8 posted on 09/21/2006 1:18:05 PM PDT by Mikey_1962 (If you build it, they won't come...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

I thought they were already in the stone age.


9 posted on 09/21/2006 1:18:57 PM PDT by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
I think it was a very rude remark," Musharraf says in the interview

Mushy wouldn't have liked it much if I'd been President on 9/12/01.
He'd not have been around to feel offended.

10 posted on 09/21/2006 1:19:00 PM PDT by ASA Vet (3.03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Would this not be in line with Bin Laden's wish? Or should we just bomb them back to the year 700?


11 posted on 09/21/2006 1:19:21 PM PDT by texas_mrs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

I'm afraid it's going to happen eventually, whether from us or from India.


12 posted on 09/21/2006 1:20:12 PM PDT by denydenydeny ("We have always been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be detested in France"--Wellington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Grumpy
I thought they were already in the stone age.

That was my thought. A sneeze could have sent them back into the stone age.

13 posted on 09/21/2006 1:24:44 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand ("...peace is the result of victory...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
They recently released thousands of terrorist from their prisons without telling us and they could easily have slipped back again into Iraq and Afghanistan.

Seems some bombing would have made them more honorable patterns in the War Against Terror.
14 posted on 09/21/2006 1:26:37 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadeInAmerica

(stone age)that is only a week time wise to pakistan.


15 posted on 09/21/2006 1:29:22 PM PDT by bdfromlv (Leavenworth hard time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

No, Azoic..


16 posted on 09/21/2006 1:30:24 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bdfromlv

(stone age)that is only a week time wise to pakistan.

_______________________________________________

Thanks for the laugh... :)


17 posted on 09/21/2006 1:33:05 PM PDT by MadeInAmerica (- If ILLEGAL means Undocumented - Then Breaking and Entering means Unannounced Visit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dark Wing; Dog Gone; blam; Shermy; a_Turk; TigerLikesRooster
Apparently the Bush administration threatened to nuke Pakistan after 9/11. This is in a 60 Minutes interview with Pakistan's President Musharraf to be aired this weekend.

The only way to bomb Pakistan back to the Stone Age is by using nuclear weapons.

I was aware that the Bush administration had threatened Pakistan after 9/11, and of Indian reports that then ISI chief Gul (the one Musharraf refers to in this interview) had funnelled $100,000 to the 9/11 hijackers, and that Gul was in Washington D.C. on 9/11. I suspected that the 9/11 hijackers might have had intelligence, signals and diplomatic pouch support from the ISI in the Pakistani embassy given the Indian reports of the $100,000 financing being traced through accounts controlled by Gul.

I was also aware that ISI people had raced throughout Pakistan afterwards urging local religious leaders and chiefs not to oppose Pakistani govt. acquiesence in the use of Pakistani territory by American forces attacking the Taliban. I thought this was due to American threats. The absence of followup reports, though, led me to suspect that the reports of American threats, and of ISI involvement in 9/11, had been exaggerated.

But I had no idea that the Bush administration had actually threatened to nuke Pakistan. Musharraf is a credible source here. This gives far more credibility to those Indian reports of ISI involvement in 9/11.

18 posted on 09/21/2006 1:34:39 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
Armitage didn't say that. Musharraf was lurking on FR.
19 posted on 09/21/2006 1:36:33 PM PDT by wolfcreek (You can spit in our tacos and you can rape our dogs but, you can't take away our freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

I am glad to hear it! More Reaganese tough talk with these A-holes is in order.

I am proud of the liberal punk if he actually did this.


20 posted on 09/21/2006 1:38:20 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (War Monger...In the name of liberty, let's go to war!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson