Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ancient Fossil Child Discovered in Ethiopia [NPR]
National Public Radio ^ | September 20, 2006 | Christopher Joyce

Posted on 09/20/2006 4:21:21 PM PDT by Wormwood

September 20, 2006 · Scientists in Ethiopia have discovered the skeleton of a 3.3 million years old child, the oldest child fossil on record. The fossil is known as the Dikika child, after the region where it was found.

Though not a human, the apelike creature could walk upright. The child is from the same species as the famous fossil Lucy, which was also discovered in Ethiopia over 30 years ago. It was probably female, and about three when it died.

The child lay within a sandstone tomb for over 3 million years. Six years ago, an Ethiopian scientist saw part of a skull sticking up out of the ground.

"I realized the significance of the fossil," says Zeresenay Alemseged, of the Max Planck Institute in Germany. "But what we had then was only the upper part of the body -- including the skull."

Alemseged soon realized the fossil contained more than a skull, but that retrieving it from the ground would be a time-consuming process.

"It took me, and I underline, 5 years," says Alemseged. "It was thousands and thousands of hours cleaning, preparing, and describing this fossil since it was discovered in 2000."

As Alemseged scraped away, rumors spread throughout the anthropological community. Bernard Wood, an anthropologist at George Washington University, visited Alemseged's lab a year ago to see the skeleton.

"He took this thing out of his safe and I was just sort of standing there with my jaw dropping somewhere around my knees," says Wood. "It's just the most remarkable thing to see -- to contemplate what is such an unlikely event ¿ which is the fossilization -- and then the fact that it's found. I mean, it's such a long shot."

Alemseged has now described the fossil in the journal Nature . Besides the skull, the fossil contains the upper and lower jaws, ribs, finger bones, leg and foot bones. The baby and adult teeth are still in the jaw. Wood says anthropologists are practically salivating at the information the skeleton might hold.

"You very seldom find all these things together," he says. "You rarely find them all together in an infant."

The child is from the group called Australopithecus afarensis . It's widely believed to be a transitional form between tree-dwelling primates and the earliest human-like species, but its exact position in the primate family tree is still debated.

Anthropologists do know that the A. afarensis walked, one of the first developments in human evolution. The lower body of the child does belong to a walker, but its finger bones are curved, suggesting a climber. The shoulder blade of the creature, Wood says, is also quite rare.

"You very rarely find [a fully preserved shoulder blade] in the fossil record," he says, "It's surrounded by muscle and it's high up on the wish list of scavengers. But this isn't modern human like either. Rather intriguingly, it's like the shoulder blade of a gorilla."

The fossil is especially interesting to anthropologists because it's a child, which could illuminate how these early creatures matured.

It may also indicate how changes in the Ethiopian climate could have influenced human evolution. Rene Bobe, from the University of Georgia and an author on the scientific paper, says the landscape was changing when A. afarensis and later, the first human ancestors, lived.

"There is indeed an opening of the environment," he says, "which means more grasslands coming in and fewer trees and forests."

There will be more chances for researchers to study the fossil. Some of the fossil is still hidden because Alemseged says he hasn't finished scraping away all the sandstone, a process which may take some time. So there's still more to see.

But Alemseged "doesn't want to be rushed" into finishing the recovery work. "Maybe it's the Ethiopian wisdom," he says. "We had this huge responsibility of conveying right scientific messages to the scientific community so I decided right from the beginning that we would wait as long as it takes."


 

Meet the Relatives

  
The 3.3 million -year-old skeleton just found in Dikika has plenty of anthropological company. Here's a look at some of the top regional finds of the last 40 years.
  
"Lucy"
 
WHO: 3.18 million-year-old adult female fossil

 
SPECIES: Australopithecus afarensis
 
WHERE: Ethiopia
 

FOUND BY: Americans Donald Johanson and Tom Gray
 
WHEN: November 1974
 
Researchers were quite excited when they saw what looked like an almost-complete hominid skeleton at the Hadar site in Ethiopia. That night back at camp, they celebrated by drinking and singing Beatles' songs -- including "Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds." At some point during the night -- no one remembers when -- researchers started calling the skeleton Lucy, too.

  
"The First Family"
 
WHO: 13 3.2-million-year-old individuals ranging from adults to children
 
SPECIES: Australopithecus afarensis

 
WHERE: Ethiopia
 
FOUND BY: Americans Donald Johanson and Michael Bush
 

WHEN: Summer 1975
 
Because they were the oldest living example of a species living in a group, National Geographic called the skeletons "The First Family."
  
"Laetoli Footprints "

 
WHAT: 3.6 million-year-old footprints preserved in volcanic ash, providing early evidence for upright bipedal walking
 
WHERE: Laetoli, Tanzania
 

FOUND BY: American Andrew Hill
 
WHEN: 1976
 
Hill and a colleague were tossing elephant dung at each other at an architectural site. Hill dived to avoid a piece of flying feces and discovered the footprints.

--Melody Joy Kramer

 
 


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: afarensis; anthropology; ausio; australopithecus; dikika; dikikachild; dmanisi; evolutioniscorrect; godsgravesglyphs; oldowan; podcast; proofofevolution; republicofgeorgia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: DaveLoneRanger
Standing by for the bigger picture to come out in about three to four years, and be listed on page A99.

Yes, the full and detailed evidence supporting evolution is usually not prominently displayed, since the eventual publication of the results of long and careful analysis is not as dramatic as the initial announcement of the find.

21 posted on 09/20/2006 4:45:39 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
Standing by for breathless media blitzing on this.

Given this find's importance, I would hope so.

22 posted on 09/20/2006 4:53:00 PM PDT by Wormwood (Everybody lies, but it doesn't matter because nobody listens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood

23 posted on 09/20/2006 5:00:05 PM PDT by dubie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
Your guess is as good as mine on some of it. What it kind of sounds like to me is that FR has a better set of managers and moderators than it did three or four years ago and you and your little clique are having a difficult time adjusting to that. It also sounds like this little schtick of yours (the thing about needing to profess belief in evolutionism in order to be a "respectable" Christian or a respectable conservative) is falling on deaf ears here these days. That might be partly the work of the ID crowd, and it might also amount to the powers that be on FR having figured you guys out, particularly with your having set up a separate website from which to stage forays onto FR.

Other than that, I still get the impression that several of you guys are teenagers from the way you write and your habitual style of "debate", which is why I generally don't respond to your posts.

24 posted on 09/20/2006 5:03:10 PM PDT by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
Monkey skulls show lots of variation and not all of them have canines which are terribly much different from ours. This spider monkey skull for instance is not that different from the picture of the new fossil:


25 posted on 09/20/2006 5:14:23 PM PDT by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood

Thanks for the ping!


26 posted on 09/20/2006 6:20:45 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

A friend of mine in high school in the early 60's got hired every year to follow the Ringling Bros. Circus parade in L.A. and shovel up the elephant poo. Made $25.00 an hour during that day which was major bucks back then with gas at 23.9 per gallon.


27 posted on 09/20/2006 6:42:07 PM PDT by stumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dubie

DING DING DING DING DING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


28 posted on 09/20/2006 8:10:39 PM PDT by JRios1968 (Tagline wanted...inquire within)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

RE: fossils
Fossil Find Is Missing Link in Human Evolution
http://beepbeepitsme.blogspot.com/2006/09/fossil-find-is-missing-link-in-human.html


29 posted on 09/24/2006 3:47:59 AM PDT by beepbeepitsme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Note: this topic was posted 9/20/2006. Thanks Wormwood.

30 posted on 04/22/2014 7:55:45 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson