Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ralph Nader Attacks Hillary
NewsMax ^ | 20 September 2006

Posted on 09/20/2006 4:05:49 AM PDT by Aussie Dasher

Consumer activist Ralph Nader, not ruling out a fourth run for president himself, said Tuesday that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton was already running for the White House and could face Sen. John McCain in the 2008 election.

"If she is a candidate in the Democratic primary with three other white men, she is going to win the primary," Nader said during a campaign stop in Albany in which he endorsed Clinton's Green Party challenger, Howie Hawkins, in this year's New York Senate race. "Then, it's down to her versus McCain."

Nader, the Green Party's presidential candidate in 2000, said he wasn't sure who would win a Clinton-McCain showdown.

The three-time losing presidential contender said he would probably decide by the middle of next year whether to make another third-party run, but had no doubt about Clinton's intentions.

"They are already planning her campaign," Nader said. "There is no doubt in the world. You couldn't get any odds in Las Vegas on this." Nader complained that Clinton had sold out to corporate interests in pursuit of campaign contributions and political power.

"She's become a profound corporate Democrat marching arm in arm with major corporate lobbyists toward the White House instead of representing the people's interests," Nader said.

Clinton campaign adviser Howard Wolfson declined to comment on Nader's remarks.

Meanwhile, the anti-Iraq war activist who was crushed by Clinton in last week's Democratic Senate primary said Tuesday he would not support her re-election bid and called on his supporters to vote against her.

"I urge my supporters and the people who voted for me to vote their conscience," said Jonathan Tasini. "Every vote that is not cast for the incumbent is a clear repudiation of an immoral war." The reaction from the Clinton camp was curt: "Who cares?" said Wolfson.

Tasini, a former president of the National Writers' Union, did not endorse any specific candidate in the Senate race, which many see as a prelude to a 2008 White House run by the former first lady.

Asked Monday night on Comedy Central's "The Daily Show" about the prospect of his wife making such a run, former President Clinton said once again that he didn't know if she would run or not.

"I know this," he added. "If she did run and win, she'd be great; she'd be really good."

Among others, Clinton faces former Yonkers Mayor John Spencer, a conservative Republican supporter of the war, and Hawkins, an anti-war Green Party contender, in the November election.

Hawkins held a fundraiser with Nader in Albany before their joint news conference at which Nader took Clinton to task for accepting hefty corporate campaign contributions and said Hawkins should be in any Senate debates she agrees to.

In the campaign leading up to her primary victory, Clinton refused to debate Tasini and largely ignored his candidacy.

"Hillary Clinton has surrendered her integrity, her principles and her past beliefs in order to gain the arrogance of power and what she expects to be a coronation on Election Day in New York state," Nader said. "Don't let her get away with it."

Tasini brought up the debate issue again on Tuesday.

"I intend on continuing to raise the issues I care about in the coming weeks and beyond," he said. "First and foremost, I will lobby for and support the inclusion in all public debates of all legally qualified candidates, regardless of poll numbers or money raised or spent."

In the Democratic primary, Clinton collected almost 600,000 votes to fewer than 120,000 for Tasini.

Appearing on a radio talk show Tuesday, Republican Spencer expressed frustration that Clinton has refused to be pinned down about when and where she would debate him. Aides have said she will debate, but have offered no specifics.

"Hillary Clinton is hiding and sending out her little talking dogs to bark about John Spencer," the GOP challenger told Albany's WROW-AM.

Spencer took Clinton to task for a host of things, including what he said was her failure to defend Pope Benedict XVI, who is under attack from Muslims for comments he made last week about Islam.

"I call on Sen. Clinton, if she's going to be a leader, to stand up right now on behalf of Catholics and defend the pope," said Spencer, a Roman Catholic. "I'm appalled no one is defending the pope."

Asked about the pope controversy at an event in Washington, Clinton said the harsh attacks on the pope were wrong.

"It's just outrageous and offensive that people would be threatening violence against him based on what he said, especially when there is so much they should be working on together," Clinton said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; clintoon; hitlery; mrsbj; ralphnader; witchofwashington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Anyone for popcorn???
1 posted on 09/20/2006 4:05:50 AM PDT by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
The three-time losing presidential contender said he would probably decide by the middle of next year whether to make another third-party run, but had no doubt about Clinton's intentions. "They are already planning her campaign," Nader said.

Thanks for telling us, Ralphie; we never would've known.

But here's a tip for ya: Hillary doesn't have a chance of winning the general election, and McCain doesn't have a chance of even winning the GOP nomination.

2 posted on 09/20/2006 4:10:23 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
HILLARY: Unsafe At Any Speed.

Let's think of a new revision for an old line from Nader to fit Hitlery. haha

3 posted on 09/20/2006 4:11:51 AM PDT by moonman (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Clinton campaign adviser Howard Wolfson declined to comment on Nader's remarks.

I find this a little hard to believe. Wolfson, who is even more of a snake than Serpenthead, never misses an opportunity to slip the shiv in.

4 posted on 09/20/2006 4:12:53 AM PDT by sauropod (Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." PJO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
People want her heinous to speak out and when she does it's usually something vapid and meaningless.

And then there's her cringemaking voice.

5 posted on 09/20/2006 4:15:59 AM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

McCain will not get the nomination.

JMO, plus I can't stand the guy.


6 posted on 09/20/2006 4:16:03 AM PDT by airborne (Fecal matter is en route to fan! Contact is imminent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

He assumes the pubs will nominate McCain doesn't he?


7 posted on 09/20/2006 4:16:34 AM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Nader, the Green Party's presidential candidate in 2000, said he wasn't sure who would win a Clinton-McCain showdown.

I can tell who would lose. The American people.

8 posted on 09/20/2006 4:16:39 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

Yep. And that's something I fear.

Too many mindless lemmings will vote for him.


9 posted on 09/20/2006 4:17:23 AM PDT by sauropod (Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." PJO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Does Nader think that she will run, and white men can't win? If so, his mind should be recalled. It is unsafe to operate.


10 posted on 09/20/2006 4:26:35 AM PDT by Graymatter (TV-free and clean for 3 years, 4 months.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

McCain will not get the nomination. If I have to choose between him and Rudy (liberal in social issue, but strong in security and economy), I will pick Rudy. And I'm actually a social conservative too.


11 posted on 09/20/2006 4:42:47 AM PDT by paudio (Universal Human Rights and Multiculturalism: Liberals want to have cake and eat it too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Consumer activist Ralph Nader, not ruling out a fourth run for president himself, said Tuesday that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton was already running for the White House and could face Sen. John McCain in the 2008 election.

Wrong and wrong.

Hillary! cannot win outside the friendly confines of the Northeast and, perhaps, California. The race will be quickly winnowed to Hillary! and one other challenger, and Hillary! will lose. The more people see of her, the more they dislike her. She will not be able to take her "Listening Tour" schtik nationwide.

And John McCain will never win the Republican nomination. Not gonna happen.

12 posted on 09/20/2006 4:47:28 AM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
A freaking nobody & borderline kook from uber liberal Massachusetts damn near beat a sitting president during a time of prosperity and warfare.

She has a chance. A very good chance.
13 posted on 09/20/2006 4:52:25 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

McCain has a campaign staff and decades of political connections. He will win.

Hillary has the Clinton and company machine, not to mention her middle of the road image in the MSM. She will win.

Lets compare predictions after the nominations, shall we?


14 posted on 09/20/2006 4:57:46 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Damn misleading headline.
I was hoping Nader met up with and beat the snot out or Mrs. Clinton.


15 posted on 09/20/2006 5:01:46 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
McCain is hated by vast numbers of Republicans, and these are the Republicans most likely to vote in primaries. In open primaries, McCain wins. In closed primaries, he has to get votes from the Republican base, and that is just not going to happen.

Hillary! can not win a general election. It could be that the Democrat Party will commit electoral suicide by nominating somebody who has absolutely no chance to win, but I would not count on it.

The organizational advantages of McCain and Hillary! are formidable, no doubt. But at the end of the day they actually have to get people to vote for them.

16 posted on 09/20/2006 5:05:53 AM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Run, Ralph, run!!


17 posted on 09/20/2006 5:07:17 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Nader, McCain, and Hilary all in the same race.

If that ever came to pass, I'd be tempted to just go ahead and start building a bunker.


18 posted on 09/20/2006 5:11:45 AM PDT by A Balrog of Morgoth (With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
"Hillary Clinton has surrendered her integrity, her principles ......"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Wouldn't HAVING principle and integrity be prerequisite to surrendering same?

.

19 posted on 09/20/2006 5:14:24 AM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
I am already hearing rumblings, latest from Mara Liasson on Brit's show last night, of how it would be *best* if "Democrats lost the midterms" so they could be obstructionist and drive Bush crazy before the General election in 08.

They know they will lose in 2006. Just because they haven't conceded 2008 doesn't mean a thing. Offering Hillary the leadership position in the Senate so she could then use it as a springboard in 2012 has been published by the donks themselves. No way even Hillary would run against a sitting Democrat POTUS. I believe they know she cannot win in 2008, either.

Watch for them to run Finegold as a sacrificial worm. McCarthy redux.
20 posted on 09/20/2006 5:16:33 AM PDT by reformedliberal ("Eliminate the mullahs and Islam shall disappear in fifty years." Ayatollah Khomeini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson