Skip to comments.
Ralph Nader Attacks Hillary
NewsMax ^
| 20 September 2006
Posted on 09/20/2006 4:05:49 AM PDT by Aussie Dasher
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Anyone for popcorn???
To: Aussie Dasher
The three-time losing presidential contender said he would probably decide by the middle of next year whether to make another third-party run, but had no doubt about Clinton's intentions. "They are already planning her campaign," Nader said. Thanks for telling us, Ralphie; we never would've known.
But here's a tip for ya: Hillary doesn't have a chance of winning the general election, and McCain doesn't have a chance of even winning the GOP nomination.
2
posted on
09/20/2006 4:10:23 AM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: Aussie Dasher
HILLARY: Unsafe At Any Speed.
Let's think of a new revision for an old line from Nader to fit Hitlery. haha
3
posted on
09/20/2006 4:11:51 AM PDT
by
moonman
(`)
To: Aussie Dasher
Clinton campaign adviser Howard Wolfson declined to comment on Nader's remarks. I find this a little hard to believe. Wolfson, who is even more of a snake than Serpenthead, never misses an opportunity to slip the shiv in.
4
posted on
09/20/2006 4:12:53 AM PDT
by
sauropod
(Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." PJO)
To: Aussie Dasher
People want her heinous to speak out and when she does it's usually something vapid and meaningless.
And then there's her cringemaking voice.
5
posted on
09/20/2006 4:15:59 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: Aussie Dasher
McCain will not get the nomination.
JMO, plus I can't stand the guy.
6
posted on
09/20/2006 4:16:03 AM PDT
by
airborne
(Fecal matter is en route to fan! Contact is imminent!)
To: sauropod
He assumes the pubs will nominate McCain doesn't he?
7
posted on
09/20/2006 4:16:34 AM PDT
by
cajungirl
(no)
To: Aussie Dasher
Nader, the Green Party's presidential candidate in 2000, said he wasn't sure who would win a Clinton-McCain showdown. I can tell who would lose. The American people.
8
posted on
09/20/2006 4:16:39 AM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
To: cajungirl
Yep. And that's something I fear.
Too many mindless lemmings will vote for him.
9
posted on
09/20/2006 4:17:23 AM PDT
by
sauropod
(Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." PJO)
To: Aussie Dasher
Does Nader think that she will run, and white men can't win? If so, his mind should be recalled. It is unsafe to operate.
10
posted on
09/20/2006 4:26:35 AM PDT
by
Graymatter
(TV-free and clean for 3 years, 4 months.)
To: Aussie Dasher
McCain will not get the nomination. If I have to choose between him and Rudy (liberal in social issue, but strong in security and economy), I will pick Rudy. And I'm actually a social conservative too.
11
posted on
09/20/2006 4:42:47 AM PDT
by
paudio
(Universal Human Rights and Multiculturalism: Liberals want to have cake and eat it too!)
To: Aussie Dasher
Consumer activist Ralph Nader, not ruling out a fourth run for president himself, said Tuesday that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton was already running for the White House and could face Sen. John McCain in the 2008 election. Wrong and wrong.
Hillary! cannot win outside the friendly confines of the Northeast and, perhaps, California. The race will be quickly winnowed to Hillary! and one other challenger, and Hillary! will lose. The more people see of her, the more they dislike her. She will not be able to take her "Listening Tour" schtik nationwide.
And John McCain will never win the Republican nomination. Not gonna happen.
12
posted on
09/20/2006 4:47:28 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
To: Mr. Mojo
A freaking nobody & borderline kook from uber liberal Massachusetts damn near beat a sitting president during a time of prosperity and warfare.
She has a chance. A very good chance.
13
posted on
09/20/2006 4:52:25 AM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: gridlock
McCain has a campaign staff and decades of political connections. He will win.
Hillary has the Clinton and company machine, not to mention her middle of the road image in the MSM. She will win.
Lets compare predictions after the nominations, shall we?
14
posted on
09/20/2006 4:57:46 AM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: Aussie Dasher
Damn misleading headline.
I was hoping Nader met up with and beat the snot out or Mrs. Clinton.
15
posted on
09/20/2006 5:01:46 AM PDT
by
Joe Boucher
(an enemy of islam)
To: bill1952
McCain is hated by vast numbers of Republicans, and these are the Republicans most likely to vote in primaries. In open primaries, McCain wins. In closed primaries, he has to get votes from the Republican base, and that is just not going to happen.
Hillary! can not win a general election. It could be that the Democrat Party will commit electoral suicide by nominating somebody who has absolutely no chance to win, but I would not count on it.
The organizational advantages of McCain and Hillary! are formidable, no doubt. But at the end of the day they actually have to get people to vote for them.
16
posted on
09/20/2006 5:05:53 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
To: Aussie Dasher
17
posted on
09/20/2006 5:07:17 AM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
To: Aussie Dasher
Nader, McCain, and Hilary all in the same race.
If that ever came to pass, I'd be tempted to just go ahead and start building a bunker.
18
posted on
09/20/2006 5:11:45 AM PDT
by
A Balrog of Morgoth
(With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
To: Aussie Dasher
"Hillary Clinton has surrendered her integrity, her principles ......" HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Wouldn't HAVING principle and integrity be prerequisite to surrendering same?
.
19
posted on
09/20/2006 5:14:24 AM PDT
by
Elle Bee
To: bill1952
I am already hearing rumblings, latest from Mara Liasson on Brit's show last night, of how it would be *best* if "Democrats lost the midterms" so they could be obstructionist and drive Bush crazy before the General election in 08.
They know they will lose in 2006. Just because they haven't conceded 2008 doesn't mean a thing. Offering Hillary the leadership position in the Senate so she could then use it as a springboard in 2012 has been published by the donks themselves. No way even Hillary would run against a sitting Democrat POTUS. I believe they know she cannot win in 2008, either.
Watch for them to run Finegold as a sacrificial worm. McCarthy redux.
20
posted on
09/20/2006 5:16:33 AM PDT
by
reformedliberal
("Eliminate the mullahs and Islam shall disappear in fifty years." Ayatollah Khomeini)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson