Posted on 09/10/2006 9:16:53 AM PDT by mware
Edited on 09/10/2006 3:32:33 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
I didn't hear if anyone was planning for a live thread of the film tonight. Just in case anyone wants to start early. Some in Australia already have seen part 1. Part 1 airs tonight at 8pm Eastern Time on ABC.
You don't understand... part of the deal was they would edit the Bush bash night with dirt.
I wonder if they'll have a roundtable and 'special' guests to debunk those tomorrow night? Nope, no Ben Veniste and the usual suspects like tonight to debunk tonight's view./s
I hate soft hands on a man. That is so icky! Give me a real man with rough hewn hands, like my hard workin' husband!
It really didn't matter in the end. What aired was damming enough. And the clintons were stupid enough to alert ua all to watch it.
BREAKING: weapon on plane, possibly scalpel here in Pittsburgh. US AIRways plane. Knife found in seat.
I suffered through most of the Nightline stuff.
It actually wasn't too bad...Ross' part anyway. I had to turn off Terry.
An outstanding young man from my home town died in the US Cole attach.
>>Now they are blaming no retaliation for the USS Cole on both Clinton and Bush<<
>Now how was PRESIDENT Bush supposed to do anything about the Cole when he wasn't even in office yet? Someone lose the calendar? did they forget about the Sore/Loserman debacle?<
And don't ever forget that the leftwing kooks in the Senate delayed Bush's Attorney General pick (John Ashcroft) for months.
No, it's usually a LOT worse.
I wouldn't wannabe Maddie Albrights man Friday manana. ABC portrayed her as the Queen Shrew. LOL
Editing...
LOL right!
LOL! My head is spinning!
Bill Clinton refused to order a strike on Osama bin Laden after the bombing of the destroyer USS Cole even though the alQaeda leader's whereabouts were known, according to a book to be published this week.
In early leaks from Losing bin Laden, Richard Miniter, an investigative journalist, claims Mr. Clinton allowed the Sept. 11 attacks to happen by squandering more than a dozen opportunities to capture or kill bin Laden. In two cases, the terrorist leader's exact location was known, the book says.
Although Clinton supporters would doubtless reject the implication of responsibility for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, senior members of the Clinton White House did confirm, in interviews for the book, that they shied away from an attack immediately after the Cole bombing for reasons of diplomacy and military caution.
Robert Novak, a conservative columnist given early access to the book, reported that on Oct. 12, 2000, the day the warship was bombed at Aden, killing 17 sailors, Mr. Clinton's counterterrorism chief, Richard Clarke, urged an immediate strike on alQaeda camps and Taliban buildings in Kabul and Kandahar in Afghanistan. Such a strike would destroy terrorist infrastructure and, with luck, might kill bin Laden, Mr. Clarke told senior colleagues.
But he was overruled first by the CIA and FBI, which wanted more investigation of the attack, and then by the Clinton Cabinet. Janet Reno, then the attorney general, said an attack would break international law. Madeleine Albright, then secretary of state, is quoted as saying, "Bombing Muslims wouldn't be helpful at this time." Most controversially, the book quotes William Cohen, then the defence secretary, as saying the Cole attack "was not sufficiently provocative" and retaliation might cause trouble in Pakistan. Mr. Cohen told The Washington Post he did not recall the Cabinet meeting, but "certainly regarded the Cole as a major provocation." Copyright 2003 National Post, All Rights Reserved. SOURCE: The Daily Telegraph
Soft hands and girly dictation. ewwww
And the clintons were stupid enough to alert ua all to watch it.
You are so right, that was the best marketing, ever.
* WEST COASTERS READY *
You and yours, I take it, don't live and never travel to any spots that terrorists want to hit, so YOU don't give a damn about what the terrorists want/plan to do to those of us who DO and/or DO have family and friends in those places, AND CARE ABOUT OUR FELLOW AMERICANS, NO MATTER WHERE THEY ARE.......EVEN THOUGH WE DON'T KNOW THEM. And you have the nerve to call yourself a "conservative"?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.