Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Life 2.0 (Science plays God)
The Economist ^ | 9/10/06 | The Economist

Posted on 09/10/2006 5:38:02 AM PDT by voletti

At the moment, what passes for genetic engineering is mere pottering. It means moving genes one at a time from species to species so that bacteria can produce human proteins that are useful as drugs, and crops can produce bacterial proteins that are useful as insecticides. True engineering would involve more radical redesigns. But the Carlson curve (Dr Carlson disavows the name, but that may not stop it from sticking) is making that possible.

In the short run such engineering means assembling genes from different organisms to create new metabolic pathways or even new organisms. In the long run it might involve re-writing the genetic code altogether, to create things that are beyond the range of existing biology. These are enterprises far more worthy of the name of genetic engineering than today's tinkering. But since that name is taken, the field's pioneers have had to come up with a new one. They have dubbed their fledgling discipline “synthetic biology”. Truly intelligent design

One of synthetic biology's most radical spirits is Drew Endy. Dr Endy, who works at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, came to the subject from engineering, not biology. As an engineer, he can recognise a kludge when he sees one. And life, in his opinion, is a kludge.

(Excerpt) Read more at economist.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-196 next last
To: Ichneumon

And you know that these *natural processes* weren't desgined and put into motion by intelligence... how?


61 posted on 09/11/2006 5:24:31 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Are you not starting with the assumption, however, that the universe came into being without intelligence?

No I'm not.

I have demonstrated that whether it was or not, your claims about what natural processes can or can not do are grossly false.

Things behaving according to the laws that govern them are not evidence that order and complexity can arise without intelligence.

Sure they are.

If someone creates a machine that performs a certain function and it does that faithfully, the machine was still created by intelligence so, not only is the machine a result of intelligence but the product it produces is also, even though the intelligent source was not directly active in the creation of each and every product.

Okey dokey, as soon as you can demonstrate that the laws of physics were actually cranked out on an assembly line, you might have some basis for your currently unfounded conclusions. As it is, you're engaging in a classic example of circular reasoning.

In the meantime, your attempts to claim that natural processes cannot increase order or complexity are still gross falsehoods. They can and do. Your claims are as vapid and incorrect as claiming that a computer can't sort a list of numbers, because, gosh, computers were built by people. Nice non sequitur.

62 posted on 09/11/2006 5:26:41 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: metmom
And you know that these *natural processes* weren't desgined and put into motion by intelligence... how?

Where did I claim to know such a thing, and where did you hallucinate that I had based any of my post upon any such requirement?

63 posted on 09/11/2006 5:28:06 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: voletti
Life 2.0 (Science plays God)

So... Why is recombining or tweaking genes considered "playing God" while planting corn isn't?

64 posted on 09/11/2006 5:30:51 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom
And you know that these *natural processes* weren't desgined and put into motion by intelligence... how?

As I already mentioned, I claimed no such knowledge. However, when *you* write something like, "Order and complexity are a result of intelligence" (in your post #12), perhaps *you* could answer the following question: "And you know that these *natural processes* were designed and put into motion by intelligence... how?"

65 posted on 09/11/2006 5:34:34 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

Why did you address this reply to me?


66 posted on 09/11/2006 5:43:53 PM PDT by TN4Liberty (Sixty percent of all people understand statistics. The other half are clueless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TN4Liberty
Why did you address this reply to me?

Because I cut/pasted a name from the wrong post in the thread. ;-)

67 posted on 09/11/2006 5:48:46 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
It's not based on snobbery [PH's snobbish "I won't ping creation threads"], and again your gross misrepresentations do not help your cause.

Oh, but it is! I'm such a snob that I don't post for lots of other "science" threads, such as those about astrology, UFO anal probes, crystal power, ghosts, hollow earth, Nostradamus prophecies, etc. My whole ping list (now 396 names) is dedicated to such snobbery. We even have a word for it -- "rationality."

68 posted on 09/11/2006 5:56:14 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Where are the anachronistic fossils? Where are the moderate creationists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Give me one example where order and complexity are known to arise from a non intelligent cause

Human beings.

69 posted on 09/11/2006 6:01:27 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (the war on poverty should include health club memberships for the morbidly poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: metmom
In order to make these blanket statements, scientists would need to demonstrate that they indeed know all there is to know about all DNA and WHY it's the way it is. They're presuming they know more than an intelligent designer capable of creating an entire universe and the life in it. A bit presumptuous.

Worse than that, actually. One of the favorite refutations of theistic arguments is "How are *you* so specially favored to know what God is like. It's only your opinion, not falsifiable, etc. etc."

But they have no compunction, when considering life and/or "God", in jumping to the conclusion (but treating it as 'axiomatic') that God worked and thought primarily as an engineer. Why not a hacker, or even an artsy-fartsy "creative" type?

Cheers!

70 posted on 09/11/2006 6:07:29 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doc30
Nice post, but off-target / Wöhler PING!

"How" .NE. "Why"...

Cheers!

71 posted on 09/11/2006 6:10:07 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: voletti
CREATING life from scratch is the sole province of G-D, ain't it?

No more than mapping the genome. Or discovering penicillin. Remember, it used to be that death was God's will. Interfering with it was "playing God."

If God didn't want us messing around He would have made the information unavailable.

Nowhere in any Biblical text does it say "thou shalt stop scientific exploration when it gets to THIS point."

72 posted on 09/11/2006 6:10:31 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (the war on poverty should include health club memberships for the morbidly poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; Ichneumon
We even have a word for it -- "rationality."

Within which we attempt to practice niceosity.

73 posted on 09/11/2006 6:12:13 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (the war on poverty should include health club memberships for the morbidly poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

Comment #74 Removed by Moderator

To: balrog666
Even if you wouldn't prostitute your ping list for it, you love a good UFO-anal-probe article ...

The article, not the experience. However, I confess to using the ping list for crop circle threads. It is not yet a ban-able offense to ridicule that brand of idiocy.

75 posted on 09/11/2006 6:21:14 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Where are the anachronistic fossils? Where are the moderate creationists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

ID means never having to say you're sorry.


76 posted on 09/11/2006 6:30:19 PM PDT by Liberal Classic (No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon; metmom; Mamzelle
Has anyone else noticed that the science-literate posters get viciously attacked for "invading a religious thread" or "attacking religion" when they post on creationist/ID threads, yet the creationists/IDers cry about being ignored (or about "snobbery") when the science-literate posters decide to acquiesce and leave the creationists to their own sandbox?

You mean like metmom and mamzelle screaming at people making non-prayer comments on a "prayer thread" posted to News?

77 posted on 09/11/2006 6:46:41 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Oh, but it is! I'm such a snob that I don't post for lots of other "science" threads, such as those about astrology, UFO anal probes, crystal power, ghosts, hollow earth, Nostradamus prophecies, etc. My whole ping list (now 396 names) is dedicated to such snobbery. We even have a word for it -- "rationality."

You forgot crop circles, the-moon-landings-were-faked, "Electric Universe," instantaneous light (AKA "Ralph Sansbury was right"), and "the Kronia Hypothesis." We could mention Halton Arp, Black Light Power, and white supremacist invocations of the Lost Tribes of Israel.

78 posted on 09/11/2006 6:55:48 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
You forgot crop circles, the-moon-landings-were-faked, "Electric Universe" ...

Yes, the snobbery never ends.

79 posted on 09/11/2006 7:09:56 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Where are the anachronistic fossils? Where are the moderate creationists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

The world around us is filled with a plethora of cases where order and complexity are known to arise from intelligence, either directly or indirectly. There are cases where the best that could be said is that no one knows for sure. But it is not reasonable to decide with no basis for that decision, that there is no intelligence behind order and complexity. There's simply no precedent for it.


80 posted on 09/11/2006 7:20:13 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson