Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC's 'Path to 9/11': Bill Clinton's Inconvenient Truth
NewsMax ^ | September 5, 2006 | James Hirsen

Posted on 09/04/2006 5:07:47 PM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last
To: JLAGRAYFOX

The Democrats are not trying to censor/cut the CBS video, that is a fundamentalist Christian organization.

The Rats are after the ABC show and I agree with you regarding outrage in trying to avoid spotlighting their responsibility.


81 posted on 09/04/2006 7:00:36 PM PDT by CedarDave (Moonbats hate Pres. Bush so much they made a fake movie of a faked assassination. Truly despicable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
instead, an impossible spark with no cause inside the Faraday cage which
Wow ... ignorant of the FQIS wires that run INTO those fuel tanks I see (and the fact that those wires go into bundles where wires carrying HIGHER voltages and currents; or teh fact that TWA800 was a old, high-hour airframe) ...

AND of a number of aircraft over the years that experienced fuel tank explosions ...

82 posted on 09/04/2006 7:00:43 PM PDT by _Jim (Highly recommended book - Posner: "Case Closed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
I'm waiting for this to be suddenly cancelled.

Nah, but it'll be edited a little. The new version will make it clear all terrorism started on the day W took office, 8 months before 9/11.

83 posted on 09/04/2006 7:03:00 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (the war on poverty should include health club memberships for the morbidly poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
This was a great epsisode of Frontline..

"The man that knew" the O'neal story

84 posted on 09/04/2006 7:08:37 PM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Raider; All
WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?



IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY


BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS (SEE FOOTAGE)
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE


UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS
"We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."


ALBRIGHT INDICTS CLINTON FOR TERRORISM FAILURE (and doesn't even know it)



MISSING CLINTON AUDIO! 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
(+Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)


WHY THE CLINTONS FAILED "TO CAPTURE OR KILL THE TALLEST MAN IN AFGHANISTAN"
(DID THEY REALLY WANT TO TAKE HIM OUT ANYWAY?)


'MAKE IT A RULE' -- PLACE YOUR ORDER FOR OSAMA WITH CLINTON and CO.
(HEAR HILLARY + BILL MAKE THEIR PITCH)


THE (oops!) INADVERTENT (TERRORISM) ADMISSIONS OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON (HEAR HILLARY IN SF)


HILLARY GOES NUCLEAR
PROLIFERATION IN THE AGE OF CLINTON



THE FAILED, DYSFUNCTIONAL CLINTON PRESIDENCY
(DECONSTRUCTING CLINTON'S HOFSTRA SPEECH) -- part1: clinton's "Brinkley" Lie


AFTERWORD: ON CLINTON SMALLNESS
(BRINKLEY MISSES THE POINT)


PRESIDENTIAL FAILURE, 9/11 + KATRINA


Carpe Mañana: The (bill + hillary) clinton Terrorism Policy
('Can we kill 'em tomorrow?')



CHENEY: CALL THEM REPREHENSIBLE
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES5


sandy berger haberdashery feint
(the specs, not the pants or the socks)


CLINTON TREASON + THE GORELICK WALL


Reverse Gorelick


THE LEFT'S RECKLESS TET-OFFENSIVE-GAMBIT REPLAY:
the left's jihad against America is killing our troops, aiding + abetting the terrorists and imperiling all Americans


CLINTON RAPES, REVISIONISM, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY (an update)


pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic
WHY THE LEFT IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA



The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)


WAR AND TREASON AND THE NEW YORK TIMES
(Please see post 65)


IN A 'PINCH': RETHINKING THE FIRST AMENDMENT
(Which came first, the 'journalist' or the traitor?)



PINCH SULZBERGER, PEARL HARBOR + TREASON
WHY WE MUST PROSECUTE THE NEW YORK TIMES


WHY BIN LADEN WANTS HOME DELIVERY OF THE NEW YORK TIMES

MORE


85 posted on 09/04/2006 7:14:10 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/knew/

WATCH IT ONLINE


86 posted on 09/04/2006 7:15:31 PM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Geronimo
The DirecTv guide shows:

Sunday Sep. 10 from 8-11
Monday Sep. 11 from 8-10

followed by Primetime from 10-11,
..."Why no one has captured Osama bin Laden" ...

That's only 5 hours, hmmm.

87 posted on 09/04/2006 7:16:25 PM PDT by relee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1695510/posts?page=14


88 posted on 09/04/2006 7:29:14 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Civilization and democracy are under attack in Israel. Stand by her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan; Kaslin; technomage; DoughtyOne; Noumenon
"...Nope, no terrorism there - instead, an impossible spark with no cause inside the Faraday cage which is the fuel tank, to ignite fuel that won't burn if you drop a match into it..."

I keep a covered bucket 1/4 full of Kerosene in my garage (I use it for various cleaning tasks), and whenever I start the argument about TWA800, I lift the lid and toss a lit match into it.

Then, after the explanations are over, I send my converts back out into the world. They usually buy guns and ammo...................FRegards

89 posted on 09/04/2006 7:30:03 PM PDT by gonzo (.........Good grief!...I'm as confused as a baby in a topless club!.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
The question that has to be answered is whether ABC/Disney has caved to the demands by Clinton that the film be edited to remove unfavorable references to his administration?

I think it will be shown exactly as it was made. Clinton doesn't really control anything of consequence, and if ABC was that enamoured (or fearful for that matter) of him, they wouldn't have made the film in the first place.

90 posted on 09/04/2006 7:36:46 PM PDT by Dave Olson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I hope these guys are ready for their IRS audits, and have brought their Last Wills and Testaments up-to-date, and they better consider hiring a security team if Hitlery wins the nomination because they are toast if she and Soros are in charge.


91 posted on 09/04/2006 8:01:16 PM PDT by hardworking (Sneak up on a Muslim - pray for their conversion to Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

I bet this is hype just so we watch it!!! clinton will be a hero.


92 posted on 09/04/2006 8:16:34 PM PDT by malia ("How do you get a ceasefire with terrorists"? John Bolton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BOBWADE

ping


93 posted on 09/04/2006 8:29:13 PM PDT by zip (((Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough become truth to 48% of all Americans (NRA)))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

right on! he was also chasing overweight interns around with cigars! how lame. the most powerfull man on earth, the man with his finger on the nuclear trigger can't rate anything but a spitter!


94 posted on 09/04/2006 8:46:24 PM PDT by bobby.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: malia

I think you're right on. More controversy--more discussion--(from both sides of the aisle) means more viewers.


95 posted on 09/04/2006 8:50:10 PM PDT by demonrum ("That rug really tied the room together")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
But in true Clintonesque fashion, he unabashedly asserted that his admission was "not accurate."...sort of like the character whoever he was who worked in the Clinton Treasury Department and claimed in one hearing that he was telling lies to his own diary...the truth is really hurting these guys.....
96 posted on 09/04/2006 9:13:32 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demonrum

The media has always tried to pit Colin Powell against President Bush and a few times Powell has responded, denying that he said what the DMB claims he had said. But you know these guys - they don't get on the air responding to every time the DBM rumors out. So then it dies down until DBM picks it up again or - or starts in on another - Chaney, Rove, the Bush girls. Didn't I see something recently about Rice/Bush disagreeing about something.

I have always admired and respected Colin Powell. I may not always agree, but I respected that he stood fast with his beliefs. I believe Powell is an honest man. And I stand with that until proven otherwise.

President Bush is a poker player - we will know when he wants it known.


97 posted on 09/04/2006 9:15:13 PM PDT by malia ("How do you get a ceasefire with terrorists"? John Bolton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: gonzo

LOL, good for you...


98 posted on 09/04/2006 9:42:24 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Bring your press credentials to Qana, for the world's most convincing terrorist street theater.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
Wow ... ignorant of the FQIS wires that run INTO those fuel tanks I see (and the fact that those wires go into bundles where wires carrying HIGHER voltages and currents; or teh fact that TWA800 was a old, high-hour airframe) ... AND of a number of aircraft over the years that experienced fuel tank explosions ...

Wow, ignorant of the fact that Jet-A won't explode unless it's misted, as by a crash or high explosive detonation. Also ignorant of the bizarre behavior of the FBI and NTSB following the crash, e.g. removal of ALL the fabric covered by the red residue, following denials that it's significant in any way. And also ignorant of the duplicity of the Clinton administration. Typical of _Shill.

99 posted on 09/05/2006 6:38:53 AM PDT by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
Wow ... ignorant of the FQIS wires that run INTO those fuel tanks I see (and the fact that those wires go into bundles where wires carrying HIGHER voltages and currents; or teh fact that TWA800 was a old, high-hour airframe) ... AND of a number of aircraft over the years that experienced fuel tank explosions ...

Wow, ignorant of the fact that Jet-A won't explode unless it's misted, as by a crash or high explosive detonation. Also ignorant of the bizarre behavior of the FBI and NTSB following the crash, e.g. removal of ALL the fabric covered by the red residue, following denials that it's significant in any way. And also ignorant of the duplicity of the Clinton administration. Typical of _Shill.

100 posted on 09/05/2006 6:38:53 AM PDT by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson