Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The electro-magnetic gun program gets US$14.7 million
Gizmag ^ | 7/7/06 | Gizmag

Posted on 07/07/2006 1:12:03 PM PDT by Reaganesque

July 7, 2006 The United States Navy has awarded two contracts for the development of an electro-magnetic gun system capable of deployment on board naval surface combatant ships. The development work preliminary design for an Electro-Magnetic (EM) railgun prototype and the preliminary design of the U.S Navy's 32 megajoule (MJ) Laboratory Launcher. An electro-magnetic railgun uses electrical energy to accelerate projectiles to extreme velocities. Railguns do not require powders or explosives to fire the round and therefore free magazine space for other mission areas. In addition, electro-magnetic guns provide a highly consistent and uniform explosive charge that gives much greater accuracy. Thirty-two megajoule is equivalent to a firing speed of Mach 8 or eight times the speed of sound. This will be an intermediate step on the road to a 64-MJ Tactical System capable of deployment on-board naval surface combatant ships.

The development work includes a US$9.3 million contract from the Office of Naval Research (ONR) to develop technologies and preliminary design for an Electro-Magnetic (EM) railgun prototype and a US$5.4M contract from Naval Special Warfare Center-Dahlgren for the design and fabrication of the U.S Navy's 32 megajoule (MJ) Laboratory Launcher.

BAE Systems was selected by ONR to advance to the next phase of the Innovative Naval Prototype Program. Under this 30-month phase, BAE Systems will take the state-of-the-art Electro-Magnetic Railgun technologies through technology maturation and develop a preliminary design of a 32-MJ EM Railgun. Thirty-two megajoule is equivalent to a firing speed of Mach 8 or eight times the speed of sound. This will be an intermediate step on the road to a 64-MJ Tactical System capable of deployment on-board naval surface combatant ships. The design and fabrication of the 32-MJ Laboratory Launcher will serve as a major step towards development of a full-scale tactical EM Gun weapon system for the U.S. Navy.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: bang; emgun; miltech; navy; railgun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
Way cool, dude!
1 posted on 07/07/2006 1:12:08 PM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

When can I get one, and how many boxtops will I have to send in?


2 posted on 07/07/2006 1:14:19 PM PDT by Radix (Stop domestic violence. Beat abroad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Can it knock out a North Korean Ding-Dong II missile?


3 posted on 07/07/2006 1:15:24 PM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

It should be obvious that this gun is meant soley for use on nuclear powered craft.


4 posted on 07/07/2006 1:15:24 PM PDT by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Thirty-two megajoule is equivalent to a firing speed of Mach 8 or eight times the speed of sound.

For some standard projectile, I take it.

5 posted on 07/07/2006 1:15:47 PM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d, N0t Y0urs | NYT:Jihadi Journal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Railguns do not require powders or explosives to fire the round and therefore free magazine space for other mission areas. In addition, electro-magnetic guns provide a highly consistent and uniform explosive charge that gives much greater accuracy.

Does the gun require explosives or not?

6 posted on 07/07/2006 1:16:05 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Make them go home!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Nope. No propellant, no explosive charge. The projectile is a metal slug. When a projectile hits a target at hyper-sonic speed, there's not going to be much left of either the target or the round. No explosives needed.


7 posted on 07/07/2006 1:18:46 PM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
32 megajoules

That's just the prototype. The weapon they want to develop and deploy would actually put out 64 megajoules so, Mach 8 is actually the low end of the spectrum for how fast this thing will be able to fling projectiles.

8 posted on 07/07/2006 1:21:31 PM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
"He had it made special. It's an 88 Magnum. It shoots through schools." - Johnny Dangerously

Couldn't find an image of the gangster... :-(

9 posted on 07/07/2006 1:22:10 PM PDT by TChris (Banning DDT wasn’t about birds. It was about power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

1.7 Giggiawatts?


10 posted on 07/07/2006 1:22:58 PM PDT by 50sDad (ST3d: Real Star Trek 3d Chess: http://my.ohio.voyager.net/~abartmes/tactical.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Once they up the power to a high enough level and get sufficient velocity, it will be an absolutely lethal air defense weapon as well. With a projectile of sufficient velocity, it would simply be point and shoot. Without a guidance system, or any need for one, the projectile couldn't be jammed in flight like a missile's radar.


11 posted on 07/07/2006 1:23:52 PM PDT by JamesP81 ("Never let your schooling interfere with your education" --Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Radix

Man! I've wanted one of these since the first time I played "DOOM!"


12 posted on 07/07/2006 1:25:02 PM PDT by 50sDad (ST3d: Real Star Trek 3d Chess: http://my.ohio.voyager.net/~abartmes/tactical.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
A electomagnetic railgun requires no chemical propellants of any kind -- the article is poorly worded. My take is that they are comparing its ability to do work with that of convential arms.

In fact, from what I understand, besides the projectile itself, an EMR would have no moving parts whatsoever.

A weapon of this type would not need to fire rounds that themselves had any explosive or incindiary properties -- the kenetic energy alone would do all the work; witness the saboted round fired by the 120mmm smoothbore cannon on the M1 Abrahms. And that's "only" 4000 fps -- much less than what is being described here. It would probably be difficult to create any such projectile that could withstand the incredible G forces in any case.

13 posted on 07/07/2006 1:25:08 PM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Rail Gun Rail Gun Yeahhhhh

I want a Gauss Rifle too :-)


14 posted on 07/07/2006 1:25:18 PM PDT by ASH71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

15 posted on 07/07/2006 1:25:37 PM PDT by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
Can it knock out a North Korean Ding-Dong II missile?

Probably not using a dumb projectile. But using it as a launching tube for some type of guided missile ......

16 posted on 07/07/2006 1:26:59 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Make them go home!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
A question to someone smarter than me. What happens if the ship loses power or there is am EMP? Wouldn't this put the gun out of commission? If so the ship would also have to use conventional weapons also..correct?
17 posted on 07/07/2006 1:27:31 PM PDT by FreeLuna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
No explosives needed. Just a big FLUX CAPACITOR.........
18 posted on 07/07/2006 1:27:48 PM PDT by Red Badger (Follow an IROC long enough and sooner or later you will wind up in a trailer park..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

NASA has a 50cal. that fires at 3 times this speed.


19 posted on 07/07/2006 1:28:08 PM PDT by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

With a device like this, we might just be able to propel the Oscar Meyer Weinermobile past Michael Moore's house before he empties it out.


20 posted on 07/07/2006 1:28:53 PM PDT by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson