To: Reaganesque
It should be obvious that this gun is meant soley for use on nuclear powered craft.
4 posted on
07/07/2006 1:15:24 PM PDT by
mc6809e
To: mc6809e
Actually it has been considered for a later version of the DDX class vessel.
32 posted on
07/07/2006 1:38:15 PM PDT by
COEXERJ145
(Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
To: mc6809e
It should be obvious that this gun is meant soley for use on nuclear powered craft.
Nuclear powered craft do not have massive amounts of more power available as compared to turbine or diesel craft. That is a misconception.
62 posted on
07/07/2006 3:19:54 PM PDT by
TalonDJ
To: mc6809e
>>It should be obvious that this gun is meant soley for use on nuclear powered craft.<<
Didn't the article say it needed four AAA batteries?
66 posted on
07/07/2006 3:25:51 PM PDT by
RobRoy
(The Internet is doing to Evolution what it did to Dan Rather. Information is power.)
To: mc6809e
>>It should be obvious that this gun is meant soley for use on nuclear powered craft.<<
"One point twenty one jigawatts?! Tom, what was I thinking?!!"
Ok, name that movie...
68 posted on
07/07/2006 3:27:17 PM PDT by
RobRoy
(The Internet is doing to Evolution what it did to Dan Rather. Information is power.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson