Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Blocks Guantanamo Bay War-Crimes Trials (SCOTUS rules against President)
Fox News & AP ^ | June 29, 2006

Posted on 06/29/2006 7:11:53 AM PDT by pabianice

Edited on 06/29/2006 7:41:43 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Breaking...


Update:

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that President Bush overstepped his authority in ordering military war crimes trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees, a rebuke to the administration and its aggressive anti-terror policies.

Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion, which said the proposed trials were illegal under U.S. law and Geneva conventions.

The case focused on Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a Yemeni who worked as a body guard and driver for Usama bin Laden. Hamdan, 36, has spent four years in the U.S. prison at Guantanamo...

Excerpt. Read more at: Fox News


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; chiefjustice; clubgitmo; congress; constitution; cotus; detainees; dta; georgewbush; gitmo; guantanamo; guantanamobay; gwot; hamdan; judicialanarchy; judicialreview; judicialreviewsux; judiciary; president; presidentbush; ruling; scotus; supremecourt; usconstitution; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 881-895 next last
To: pabianice

Why are irregulars who are not signatories to the Conventions even covered by them?


201 posted on 06/29/2006 7:36:20 AM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Justice Kennedy voted with the libs ...

Sickening.


202 posted on 06/29/2006 7:36:25 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Fine. Bush should order them stood against the wall and executed.


203 posted on 06/29/2006 7:36:34 AM PDT by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pbrown
Haven't you been listening to Bush lately? He WANTED them to rule that way.

Please explain.

204 posted on 06/29/2006 7:36:44 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: IMRight

...but that seems to leave the door open for SCOTUS itself to define "active hostilities" and when they have ended, does it not??


205 posted on 06/29/2006 7:36:46 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Voltage

"Court ruling to have little impact on Guantanamo"

http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyid=2006-06-29T142441Z_01_N29175313_RTRUKOC_0_US-SECURITY-GUANTANAMO.xml&src=rss&rpc=22


206 posted on 06/29/2006 7:37:03 AM PDT by seanmerc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

In truth, the 'rats are more dangerous. The catastrophe of the Byzantine Empire in 1071 when they lost the battle of Manzikert to the Turks occurred because the other side of Byzantine politics abandoned the emperor on the battlefield.

The Turks won and captured most of the breadbasket of the Empire, plus its main source for soldiers.

McVey


207 posted on 06/29/2006 7:37:07 AM PDT by mcvey (Fight on. Do not give up. Ally with those you must. Defeat those you can. And fight on whatever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: zook
Yeah, the fellow above posted the same thing from SCOTUSBLOG.

So long as SCOTUS doesn't hold in the future that the GITMO detainees are entitled to due process in Americas courts this is the best of all worlds. The WOT isn't gonna end in their life times. And now they can be held for the duration without all the yapping about their day in court.

Of course, I'm dreaming. There may well be 5 votes on SCOTUS to usurp the CIC's war making authority. Sad but true.

208 posted on 06/29/2006 7:37:10 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak

Thank you, Ross Perot voters.


209 posted on 06/29/2006 7:37:19 AM PDT by Crawdad (So the guy says to the doctor, "It hurts when I do this.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
There is a simple solution here. DO NOT TAKE PRISONERS!!! SHOOT AND KILL EVERYONE ON THE BATTLEFIELD!!

They can't do that any more. JAG already has two dozen American soldiers incarcerated for killing on the battlefields in Iraq. PC reigns Supreme.
210 posted on 06/29/2006 7:37:36 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

the Borking of Robert Bork...the gift that just keeps on giving!!!!


211 posted on 06/29/2006 7:37:43 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc
"that blessing: fewer lawyers on the Mainland for a while"

Works for ME !

What's truly indicative of where all the Lefties are (bash Bush), is that the immediate prefix to all the coverage is "in a MAJOR setback to President Bush". None of them are at all addressing the implications of the ruling, but just tout the "Bush loses" flavor that makes them roll on in orgasmic fits that SOMEHOW this is good for America????

What a bunch of treasonous a$$holes we have in this country on the Left.....

212 posted on 06/29/2006 7:37:54 AM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,201530,00.html

"WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that President Bush overstepped his authority in ordering military war crimes trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees, a rebuke to the administration and its aggressive anti-terror policies."


213 posted on 06/29/2006 7:38:02 AM PDT by stopem (God Bless the U.S.A the Troops who protect her, and their Commander In Chief !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

[if the GOP were smart (and I strongly suspect they are NOT this smart!) they would pick up this ball and run with it.
This is the golden jazz-up-the-base-for-November moment that they have been waiting for. After al, the SC just sided with OSAMA BIN LADEN'S DRIVER over POTUS and 60 yrs. of settled law!!! That is 30-second spot GOLD if ever I have heard it!]

BINGO. Bears repeating. Again, and again and again. This may be the impetus to reform the liberal courts including SCOTUS.


214 posted on 06/29/2006 7:38:23 AM PDT by khnyny (Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.- Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: gakrak
It seems to me that the idiots have just ruled on having our military never take enemy combatants prisoner again.

Actually, the issue as stated isn't taking them prisoner...it's trying prisoners via a system not put into law. Different issue. I presume the actual ruling is out there somewhere.

215 posted on 06/29/2006 7:38:35 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: IMRight

"Kennedy's opinion did not support all of Stevens' discussion of the Geneva Convention, but he did find that the commissions were not authorized by military law or that Convention."

Regardless, he is off the dinner list.


216 posted on 06/29/2006 7:38:42 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

Comment #217 Removed by Moderator

To: Socratic
He also needs to say that Congress is charged with the setting up of courts and should forthwith establish a court to deal with those who fight against the US but not under the banner of a nation's armed forces. When will the Judiciary Committee begin doing their Constitutional duty?

Exactly!!

218 posted on 06/29/2006 7:39:12 AM PDT by syriacus (Superfunds aren't needed, since ONE WORD from Dems neutralizes lethal chemicals -- "RUST")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

On the other hand, this ruling will only generate more energy among conservatives to ensure that Repubs win in 2006/2008. Stevens and Ginsberg are being kept alive by machine and cannot stay on the Court much longer.


219 posted on 06/29/2006 7:39:38 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Andrew McCarthy's "pre-mortem":

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MGM3NmEzYzJiZDlhNTI0N2MzOTA3NWFmYWUxZDU0ZGU=


220 posted on 06/29/2006 7:39:52 AM PDT by PogySailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 881-895 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson