Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/25/2006 7:16:37 AM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: tsmith130

Is there a call for amnesty yet?


2 posted on 06/25/2006 7:17:47 AM PDT by toddlintown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

Who knew this guy had guts? And that he is on Bush's side?
Way to go, Pete.


3 posted on 06/25/2006 7:18:26 AM PDT by Galtoid ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

and lets not forget finding & indicting the LEAKER(S)!


4 posted on 06/25/2006 7:18:46 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

Of course that moron Juan Williams thinks that we should give the NY Slimes a Pulitzer!


7 posted on 06/25/2006 7:24:24 AM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

Dam right! Sorry but this is crossing the line. No doubt about it! The sad thing is nothing will come from this...


11 posted on 06/25/2006 7:26:53 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

Never happen but it would be great to see the NYT reporters tossed in jail until they release the names of their sources.


12 posted on 06/25/2006 7:27:29 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130
Without the imposition of Alien and Sedition Acts, it ain't gonna happen.

FEDS should be going after the governmental leakers, however. That is something they can do --- but so far seem reluctant to do.

Heck, they let Sandy Bergler slide. That set a dangerous precedent.

This is the press's trump card, because no current law (Alien and Sedition Act) has been imposed.

Amendment I - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


The John Adams Administration: Alien and Sedition Acts

Sedition campaign poster, 1800

The Alien Acts were never enforced, but the Sedition Act was. A number of Republican newspaper publishers were convicted under the terms of this law. The Jeffersonians argued quite rightly that the Sedition Act violated the terms of the First Amendment and offered a remedy in the Virginia and Kentucky

16 posted on 06/25/2006 7:33:25 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130
 
 
the Times's new publisher, Arthur "Pinch" Sulzberger Jr ... was a sixties anti-war activist who famously declared that in a confrontation between an American and a North Vietnamese soldier he'd want to see the American get shot."
 
 
 
osama1.jpg

18 posted on 06/25/2006 7:34:10 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

Unfortunately, Gonzales is spending all his time trying to locate his missing testicles...


19 posted on 06/25/2006 7:34:18 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130
I am of the opinion that the MSM is trying to goad Prez Bush into hiring a team of "Plumbers" to find the leaks and follow the path that lead to Nixon's' destruction.
25 posted on 06/25/2006 7:43:32 AM PDT by gdzla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130
I hope they close the Times up tighter then a drum for this!
33 posted on 06/25/2006 7:56:10 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

while America begins to clean house......maybe and I'll believe it when I see it? shouldn't rep murtha be censured at the very least?


37 posted on 06/25/2006 8:02:22 AM PDT by no-to-illegals ('No' worked so well, perhaps another word is in order?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

Go after the leakers. Without leakers, there is no story.


44 posted on 06/25/2006 8:09:41 AM PDT by TennTuxedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

The NY Slimes is just pandering to the enemy in order to boost sales. It is a shame that these slimes would reveal a secret program that saves American lives in order to sell papers. It is time for this rag paper to be out od business.


51 posted on 06/25/2006 8:19:49 AM PDT by quesera (Help! I've been having nightmares of Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

The"Dirty Little Secret"is that as far as The New York Slimes,etc.,ad nauseum is concerned,George W.Bush is THE ENEMY(Not Al Qeada)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


54 posted on 06/25/2006 8:21:44 AM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

What was he talking about?


56 posted on 06/25/2006 8:27:42 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Turncoat Arlan Specter was just on FOX a moment ago speaking about this.

To paraphrase him:

It would be premature to make a rush to judgment over wrongdoing by the NYT, just as it would be premature in a rush to judgment of wrongdoing by the Bush administration.

63 posted on 06/25/2006 9:18:23 AM PDT by OnRightOnLeftCoast (U.S. government: Voluntary laws and policies assuring self-destruction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130; toddlintown; Galtoid; kellynla; vetsvette; Sprite518; Ernest_at_the_Beach; TomGuy; ...
If the New York Time's assistance in giving comfort to our foes, with full knowledge of their actions, and the consequences to our defense, isn't consorting with the enemy, what is?

And the question: Should a prosecutor seek the death penalty against the editors of the New York Times?

68 posted on 06/25/2006 10:12:49 AM PDT by GOPJ (Once you see the MSM manipulate opinion, all their efforts seem manipulative-Reformedliberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130; maximusaurelius; tallhappy; Ptarmigan; WashingtonSource; nmh; lormand; AirBorn; ...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1655342/posts

Now we are told that [the two American soldiers] had their genitals cut off and stuffed into their mouth. They were beheaded. They were tortured unmercifully while still alive by the disciples of Allah, and I hear no words of outrage from the "left" today. Not a single word from Kennedy, Kerry, Pelosi, Howard Dean or Cindy Sheehan. If they speak at all, it is only to blame our president. Shame on the liberals. Shame on the Democrats. Shame on the MSM (mainstream media).

Shame on the New York Times.

69 posted on 06/25/2006 10:19:54 AM PDT by GOPJ (Once you see the MSM manipulate opinion, all their efforts seem manipulative-Reformedliberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tsmith130

Indict the Slimes!


70 posted on 06/25/2006 10:21:26 AM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson