Skip to comments.
Rep. Peter King calls on the AG to indict New York Times! (Fox News Alert)
06/25/2006
Posted on 06/25/2006 7:16:34 AM PDT by tsmith130
He was on their morning shows announcing this but no story up yet on their site. Please, let it happen!
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; doj; fifthcolumn; nyt; peterking; swift; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
1
posted on
06/25/2006 7:16:37 AM PDT
by
tsmith130
To: tsmith130
Is there a call for amnesty yet?
To: tsmith130
Who knew this guy had guts? And that he is on Bush's side?
Way to go, Pete.
3
posted on
06/25/2006 7:18:26 AM PDT
by
Galtoid
( .)
To: tsmith130
and lets not forget finding & indicting the LEAKER(S)!
4
posted on
06/25/2006 7:18:46 AM PDT
by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: kellynla
What ever happened with that FBI/CIA (?) leaker? I think her name was McCarthy. I haven't heard a thing about that since it first happened. It's not impossible that I missed the follow-up story though.
5
posted on
06/25/2006 7:22:02 AM PDT
by
tsmith130
To: kellynla
and lets not forget finding & indicting the LEAKER(S)! I'm thinking that these "principled" "journalists" will sell them out for slightly better accomodations at Club Fed.
6
posted on
06/25/2006 7:22:45 AM PDT
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
To: tsmith130
Of course that moron Juan Williams thinks that we should give the NY Slimes a Pulitzer!
7
posted on
06/25/2006 7:24:24 AM PDT
by
vetsvette
(Bring Him Back)
To: Galtoid
I don't know if he's on Bush's side so much as he knows his state is a lot less safe thanks to the NYT.
8
posted on
06/25/2006 7:24:48 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: kellynla
Absolutely. In my book, they're more criminal than the NYT, who, after all, is a liberal rag doing what liberal rags always do. I wouldn't be surprised if this leak came from the same place as the phone record leak, the CIA.
9
posted on
06/25/2006 7:26:17 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: vetsvette
Of course that moron Juana Williams You still watch him?? Whenever I see his moronic little face pop up on the screen, I turn to the Drying Paint channel. At least there it is less predictable.
And, Drying Paint has double the IQ of Juana Williams.
10
posted on
06/25/2006 7:26:43 AM PDT
by
technomage
(NEVER underestimate the depths to which liberals will stoop for power.)
To: tsmith130
Dam right! Sorry but this is crossing the line. No doubt about it! The sad thing is nothing will come from this...
To: tsmith130
Never happen but it would be great to see the NYT reporters tossed in jail until they release the names of their sources.
12
posted on
06/25/2006 7:27:29 AM PDT
by
Dave S
To: technomage
Now that's a good one, The Drying Paint channel, I'll have to remember that one. LOL
13
posted on
06/25/2006 7:28:32 AM PDT
by
marlon
To: tsmith130
McCarthy was fired and as of April, there is an "ongoing investigation" last I heard...
14
posted on
06/25/2006 7:29:31 AM PDT
by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: Galtoid; tsmith130
To: tsmith130
Without the imposition of Alien and Sedition Acts, it ain't gonna happen.
FEDS should be going after the governmental leakers, however. That is something they can do --- but so far seem reluctant to do.
Heck, they let Sandy Bergler slide. That set a dangerous precedent.
This is the press's trump card, because no current law (Alien and Sedition Act) has been imposed.
Amendment I - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The John Adams Administration: Alien and Sedition Acts
- The Sedition Act, which provided for fines or imprisonment for individuals who criticized the government, Congress or president in speech or print.
The Alien Acts were never enforced, but the Sedition Act was. A number of Republican newspaper publishers were convicted under the terms of this law. The Jeffersonians argued quite rightly that the Sedition Act violated the terms of the First Amendment and offered a remedy in the Virginia and Kentucky
16
posted on
06/25/2006 7:33:25 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: Sprite518
The sad thing is nothing will come from this... Unfortunately, I think you're probably right.
To: tsmith130
the Times's new publisher, Arthur "Pinch" Sulzberger Jr ... was a sixties anti-war activist who famously declared that in a confrontation between an American and a North Vietnamese soldier he'd want to see the American get shot."
18
posted on
06/25/2006 7:34:10 AM PDT
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: tsmith130
Unfortunately, Gonzales is spending all his time trying to locate his missing testicles...
To: pabianice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson