Skip to comments.
Rep. Peter King calls on the AG to indict New York Times! (Fox News Alert)
06/25/2006
Posted on 06/25/2006 7:16:34 AM PDT by tsmith130
He was on their morning shows announcing this but no story up yet on their site. Please, let it happen!
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; doj; fifthcolumn; nyt; peterking; swift; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-116 last
To: george76
Great stuff thanks for the link.
101
posted on
06/25/2006 3:43:55 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
To: tsmith130
Are we setting up a 'Teflon' Hillary ? hmmmm
102
posted on
06/25/2006 3:48:09 PM PDT
by
John Lenin
(The RAT party is still Stuck on Stupid)
To: gondramB
Terrorists do not have the right to be notified that they are being investigated. Period.
To: Republican Wildcat
>>Terrorists do not have the right to be notified that they are being investigated. Period.<<
I hope you don't expect me to disagree with that.
But, on the other hand, regular U.S. citizens who are not targets of national security related investigations have the right to be notified by subpoena when their homes or financial records are searched.
104
posted on
06/25/2006 5:15:13 PM PDT
by
gondramB
(Unity of freedom has never relied upon uniformity of opinion.)
To: GOPJ
You are correct. However, the media must have something on just about every politician because we never here the word treason anymore.
To: tsmith130
106
posted on
06/25/2006 9:16:48 PM PDT
by
Knitting A Conundrum
(Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
To: tsmith130
I'll believe it when I see it. Judith Miller should still be staring at striped sunlight, but alas, she's not.
107
posted on
06/26/2006 2:05:51 AM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: Galtoid
Who knew this guy had guts? And that he is on Bush's side?I don't think King has any guts. He spends most of his time in a whirlwind of emotion and hysteria.
Just once, I'd like to see some heads roll in the MSM.
I don't trust politicians that say one thing and do another.
Just you wait, once Peter King finally comes back around, he'll be riding up the elevator to Pinch's executive office suite to plant his lips on Schulzberger's backside.
108
posted on
06/26/2006 2:29:46 AM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: tsmith130
What ever happened with that FBI/CIA (?) leaker? I think her name was McCarthy. I haven't heard a thing about that since it first happened.She's living in a penthouse in Las Vegas with Sandy Berger and the ghost of Howard Hughes.
;-)
109
posted on
06/26/2006 2:53:38 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
(Scientists Are Itching to Blame Poison Ivy's Effect on Global Warming)
To: technomage
I turn to the Drying Paint channel. At least there it is less predictable. And, Drying Paint has double the IQ of Juana Williams.LOL.
Speaking of paint drying, I painted for about twenty years. Over those years I noticed that most paints of some hue, when they dried they dried slightly darker (that's why when you buy paint you should have them dry a little of it on a piece of paper before you buy it). But, little incorrigible Juan just turns a funny shade of red when Brit smacks him around the head.
;-)
110
posted on
06/26/2006 3:00:11 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
(Scientists Are Itching to Blame Poison Ivy's Effect on Global Warming)
To: gdzla
I am of the opinion that the MSM is trying to goad Prez Bush into hiring a team of "Plumbers" to find the leaks and follow the path that lead to Nixon's' destruction. Very interesting.
Just don't hire a guy like James McCord who when he saw his tape had been removed from the door jamb in the Watergate, put it back on. Double agent?
;-)
111
posted on
06/26/2006 3:05:11 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
(Scientists Are Itching to Blame Poison Ivy's Effect on Global Warming)
To: OnRightOnLeftCoast
Turncoat Arlan Specter was just on FOX a moment ago speaking about this. To paraphrase him: It would be premature to make a rush to judgment over wrongdoing by the NYT, just as it would be premature in a rush to judgment of wrongdoing by the Bush administration.It's not a coincidence that Arlen's last name sounds like Sphincter.
112
posted on
06/26/2006 3:13:04 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
(Scientists Are Itching to Blame Poison Ivy's Effect on Global Warming)
To: GOPJ
I am not sure just what happened or what your source is.
The solution to effectively eliminating these people is for Bush to sign a secret Executive Order authorizing the same tactics against the terrorist, ie. suspend the Geneva Conventions.
The terrorists are sadists, the newspapers will not say so.
To: 2ndClassCitizen
This is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1655342/posts
114
posted on
06/26/2006 7:08:35 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
( NY Times editors have the right to publish and the US has the right to arrest them for treason.)
To: beyond the sea
Speaking of paint drying, I painted for about twenty years. Over those years I noticed that most paints of some hue, when they dried they dried slightly darker (that's why when you buy paint you should have them dry a little of it on a piece of paper before you buy it). Yup, I KNEW drying paint was not only less predictable than Juana, it IS more interesting!!
115
posted on
06/26/2006 7:09:38 AM PDT
by
technomage
(NEVER underestimate the depths to which liberals will stoop for power.)
To: 2ndClassCitizen
Newspapers are not allowed to do many things by law - and they know it.
No one has appointed the New York Times to the position of deciding which secrets we tell the enemy and which ones we don't. They over stepped.
IMHO they broke the law and committed treason.
They have the right to publish anything they want, but not the right to publish anything they want without consequences. If there were no consequences the New York Times could steal columns from other newspapers and publish them. The law can't stop them from publishing. But it can stop them from publishing without consequences. In this case they could be sued successfully and be forced to pay retribution. In other words, they have the right to publish other newspapers material, but not the right to do it free from the law.
It's the same with giving secrets to the enemy. They can publish the secrets. We can arrest them for treason.
We don't need to do anything "special". Just hold the New York Times to the same laws everyone else is held to ... it's that easy.
116
posted on
06/26/2006 7:27:31 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
( NY Times editors have the right to publish and the US has the right to arrest them for treason.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-116 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson