Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Risky Bet on Immigration: House GOP leaders' stall could backfire
Dallas Morning News ^ | 6/22/2006 | Editorial

Posted on 06/22/2006 8:05:20 AM PDT by sinkspur

The Republicans running the House may not be as smart as they think they are.

They may have misread the public mood, which prompted them to press GOP Speaker Dennis Hastert to put off immigration negotiations with the Senate until September.

They also may have misread some in their very own party.

A poll being released today by the conservative Manhattan Institute and conducted by the Republican Tarrance Group shows most of the 800 likely GOP voters questioned want a solution now, even one that deals with the 12 million illegal immigrants here. Some of those surveyed even will accept a plan they consider amnesty.

Those views are much more in line with the legislation the Senate has put on the negotiating table. That bill, which passed with Republican and Democratic votes, adds agents to the border, offers many illegal immigrants a chance to earn citizenship and creates a guest worker program for future foreign workers.

The Senate plan doesn't focus on a wall, like the House bill, nor does it call for deporting illegal immigrants.

But Mr. Hastert has ignored these voices and gone with his party's most vocal immigration opponents. It's no coincidence that the fall elections are fast approaching.

(Excerpt) Read more at dallasnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnestypimps; congress; deportem; gop; hr4437; immigrantlist; immigration; openborderslobby; sealthebordernow; shamnesty; ushouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161 next last
And it certainly isn't the only voice in America. A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll last week shows that, by 50 percent to 33 percent, Americans prefer the broad solution that President Bush has outlined and that the Senate largely adopted.
1 posted on 06/22/2006 8:05:24 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
BS
2 posted on 06/22/2006 8:08:01 AM PDT by TheZMan (Proud supporter of the anti-conservopussy movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

The solution "now" is seal the border not what the senate did.


3 posted on 06/22/2006 8:09:07 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

The house has saved it's ass by shutting down that horrid legislation regardless of all the bogus polls and whining from the liberal media.


4 posted on 06/22/2006 8:09:27 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
DMN is hawking amnesty.

Some of those surveyed even will accept a plan they consider amnesty.

Yeh, some = 2 out of 10.

House of Reps is doing the right thing.


W's Bull Is Dead!
5 posted on 06/22/2006 8:09:40 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
The Republicans running the House may not be as smart as they think they are.

They are plenty smart...and up for reelection and know that if they cave to the Senate they will not be back next year. They are listening to the people that matter, their voting base.
6 posted on 06/22/2006 8:09:45 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

No bill is better than what the Senate passed, despite what the DMN would have you believe.


7 posted on 06/22/2006 8:10:01 AM PDT by ichabod1 (Let us not flinch from identifying liberalism as the opposition party to God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

I've been looking for a stance from Dick DeVos on immigration and I can tell you I won't be voting for anyone who doesn't have a stance or or supports the Bush amnesty plan.


8 posted on 06/22/2006 8:10:25 AM PDT by cripplecreek (I'm trying to think but nothing happens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan

Whatever they are smokin over at the DMN, I want some


9 posted on 06/22/2006 8:11:10 AM PDT by good_ole_texas_boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

I think it is risky, too. But the risk is extremely low. Most of the people in this country are law-abiding citizens. They have figured out the connection between open borders and increasing numbers of illegal aliens. ...not to worry!


10 posted on 06/22/2006 8:11:27 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan

""A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll ""

The Wall Street Journal is pro illegal immigration, so their poll was fixed as instructed : )


11 posted on 06/22/2006 8:11:48 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (If you got Sowell, you got Soul !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Is sinkspur the same guy as Dane? or woman?


12 posted on 06/22/2006 8:13:47 AM PDT by calvo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

It could backfire. On the other hand, the Senate's pro-immigrant stance could backfire. I'd put my bets on the latter.


13 posted on 06/22/2006 8:14:05 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Certainly there is no one individual who believes we are deploying the National Guard along the border to because there is no threat. The reason the Guard is being deployed is because there is a threat across the border, but the politicians forgot, the threat is inside our border too. I'm extremely uncomfortable with the attitude of our elected when it comes to National Security. I hope I'm wrong, but I see 'big trouble' from not having enforced the law concerning illegals.


14 posted on 06/22/2006 8:14:09 AM PDT by From One - Many (Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: From One - Many

strike to , first sentence


15 posted on 06/22/2006 8:14:55 AM PDT by From One - Many (Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Those views are much more in line with the legislation the Senate has put on the negotiating table...

***
The 800 surveyed were RINOs, then.


16 posted on 06/22/2006 8:16:30 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Never trust Democrats with national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

BS if we did an honest poll about this anarchy the likes of you and the other OBL traitors would have less popularity than Saddam.


17 posted on 06/22/2006 8:17:39 AM PDT by junta (It's Jihad stupid! It's the borders stupid! It's Political Correctness stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

LMAO.....yeah right.


18 posted on 06/22/2006 8:18:19 AM PDT by Kimberly GG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Is that cow manure I smell?


19 posted on 06/22/2006 8:18:48 AM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Phony poll is aimed at House members not the public.


20 posted on 06/22/2006 8:18:55 AM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson