Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mel Gibson Slams Da Vinci Code
NewsMax ^ | 05/22/2006 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 05/22/2006 9:36:23 AM PDT by SirLinksalot

Monday, May 22, 2006 12:44 a.m. EDT Mel Gibson Slams 'Da Vinci Code'

Catholic actor Mel Gibson has slammed "The Da Vinci Code" book and movie for attacking the beliefs that he holds sacred, World Entertainment Network reported.

"The Passion of the Christ" star has been outraged about the thriller's controversial plot concerning Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene. [Editor's Note: Get NewsMax's special report "The Da Vinci Con" FREE with Ann Coulter's book, "Godless" – CLICK HERE NOW!]

Gibson says, "What worries me is that people will take this as fact.

"I'm not angry, per se, that it refutes everything I hold sacred, the foundations of my beliefs. The Da Vinci Code is an admitted work of fiction but it cleverly weaves fact into maverick theories in a way that will appear plausible to some."

The angry star was actually the first choice of Dr. Robert Lomas (the intellectual who inspired the Robert Langdon character) to play him. Tom Hanks plays Langdon in the film


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blasphemy; catholicinsecurity; davincicode; evil; hypocrit; melgibson; ohtheirony; potandkettle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 381-382 next last
To: ClancyJ
"Just what do you find in a movie that claims the Bible lied and that Christ was not as those believers were led to believe that makes you want to "own" it."

Because it's an entertaining movie? Imagine that...I watch movies for their entertainment value.

161 posted on 05/22/2006 11:49:07 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: immigration lady

how many times must the lie be repeated before it becomes MSM truth?

consider the myth of the homosexual gene.

consider the myth of clinton boosted the ecconomy.

consider the myth of Saddam was a neat-o peacenick.

consider Cindy Sheehan was a grieving mother.
'
consider Dan Rather pushing the known "fake but accurate" story.

so on and so on.

The left knows it is fake, they are teaching the controversy to achieve legitimacy.


162 posted on 05/22/2006 11:50:54 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

You’re the one making The Passion the central issue and it wasn’t The Patriot that specifically slandered anyone, it was Braveheart. The Patriot was more just a general slander.

Btw, the Frenchman concerned admitted it was all untrue. It’s others that are perpetuating the lie.


163 posted on 05/22/2006 11:51:13 AM PDT by FostersExport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: zook

As I dared to post already, the wife and I saw it and it was an entertaining movie. If you liked National Treasure and/or Sahara you would probably like this as well.


164 posted on 05/22/2006 11:52:07 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

No, most are wishy washy when it comes to people and their opinions.


165 posted on 05/22/2006 11:52:43 AM PDT by sonsofliberty2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: betsyross1776
Thanks for a good comment,you covered "The Passion" well.

Also isn't it the message that is conveyed in the context of the media that is of utmost importance? That is where this sophistry breaks down when posters compare "The Patriot" and "Braveheart" and the "Da Vinci Code".

The lasting memory of most folks who saw "Braveheart" was that a man was beheaded and had at that moment of impending death the presence of mind and the effrontery to remind all that he was dying for "freedom". It also caused many to ponder whether he was achieving it completely when death released him from earthly bonds.

Mel Gibson knows how to get people thinking,what a great gift he has.

166 posted on 05/22/2006 11:54:35 AM PDT by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

Amen!


167 posted on 05/22/2006 11:54:42 AM PDT by sonsofliberty2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

I guess I shouldn't even mention what a fan I am of Harry Potter.... :)


168 posted on 05/22/2006 11:56:44 AM PDT by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: zook
I DID NOT want to see those since they were "kids" movies, but the wife convinced me and I have to admit I enjoyed them.

I also liked Jurassic Park and never once gave a thought about evolution while watching it.

169 posted on 05/22/2006 11:59:00 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: zook
his divinity is not based on history, but on faith. The Da Vinci Code is not "historical" either,

Way to lump those together. You know what all this controversy has taught me? I kind of already knew it but it really drives the point home. That secularists have not got the the slightest shred of a clue how Christians think. Or any religions people for that matter. In one simple post you all but equate the divinity of Christ to fiction and you still have no idea what we are so offended by... Even the WAY your kind tells us we should not be offended is offensive.
170 posted on 05/22/2006 11:59:00 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
2Th 2:9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,

2Th 2:10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

2Th 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

2Th 2:12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

Little ole' Opie needs are prayers. ;o)

171 posted on 05/22/2006 11:59:01 AM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc. 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Another movie slapping Christianity around and denying the divinity of Christ.

When will Hollywood make a movie which portrays and distorts the life of the pedophile and murderer Mohammed?

Don't hold your breath. Only the Christian/Jewish faiths are in Hollywood's sights.

Many will think it's tres chic to see this movie and give money to the producers etal so they can make more movies of the same genre.

Many will solemnly state they want to see it so they can comment on it. As Laura Ingraham quoted someone this morning (I think it was Pat Buchanan)......."I don't have to move a sewer manhole to know what's under it".

Leni

172 posted on 05/22/2006 12:01:56 PM PDT by MinuteGal (FReeps Ahoy 4 cruisers are home! Check the cruise thread for photos. Hit red "4" on Home Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasota
"A friend of mine saw it and said it's a fictionalized mystery."

Yeah right, they always use the lives and names of actual historical figures in "fiction" books and movies. Calling it "fiction" is how these scumbags hide behind their filthy attack on the Christian faith.

173 posted on 05/22/2006 12:02:38 PM PDT by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FostersExport
"“Did Mel Gibson slander real people in his movies?”

"Yes, next question?"

My next question is, "did Mel Gibson cowardly call his movie 'fiction' so he could cover himself from attack, or did he simply call his movie historical fact"?

174 posted on 05/22/2006 12:05:59 PM PDT by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
"I don't think any British officer ever ordered innocents to be burned alive inside a church."

Nah, all they did was crucify Catholic priests to the doors of their Churches before the perverted King annexed them and made those churches his own.

175 posted on 05/22/2006 12:16:26 PM PDT by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader

I think both the Catholic and Protestant churches had their share of blood on their hands so let’s not get so high and mighty, right?


176 posted on 05/22/2006 12:22:37 PM PDT by FostersExport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: ranger13008

Welcome to FR!


177 posted on 05/22/2006 12:31:53 PM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (In memory of Terri Schindler (not Schiavo!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FostersExport

"Image." But is it a true image or not? The book and the movie each say that
the image handed down by the Church is a false image. Only a man, they say. If so, why should we remember him at all or any more than Isaiah?


178 posted on 05/22/2006 12:40:44 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

No it isn't...it's fiction.

What it isn't, is an attack on anything.

For Mel to make a statement about the movie being bad based on the impact that it may have on those who he deems to be not as smart as himself is simply BS.

Do we now run the world based on the possible reaction by the least intelligent amongst us to everything?

It's a shame that there may be people too stupid to understand that this movie, like the Harry Potter movies, are works of fiction, but I don't want my world, the books that I read, and the movies I watch slanted to accommodate their lesser intellect.

Jurassic Park was no more proof of evolution than this movie is of anything.

You don't have to go watch this movie if you don't like the subject matter, and you certainly can have an opinion on it, but to go to the extremes that I have seen in the news...including censorship, is reminiscent of Islamic fundamentalism at his worst.


179 posted on 05/22/2006 1:02:46 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader

"The Fabulous Riverboat" series used historical names and facts.

So did Ivanhoe, as did the Camelot stories from Mallory.

Mark Twain did as well in his "Conneticut Yankee in King Arthur's Courts."

Is "The Red badge of Courage" not fiction because it takes place during a very real historical event?

Is it an attack on America?

Of course not.

Get over it.

The book is based on legends and stories that have been around for nearly two thousand years; the idea that Chrsit survived the crucifixion, married, and had children is not a new one.


180 posted on 05/22/2006 1:12:10 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 381-382 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson