Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The next generation of the Shahab ("shooting star" in Persian) should be capable of reaching Austria and Italy.

If the stakes for world peace weren't so high I'd genuinely love to throw the whole thing to the EU with a "Negotiate this, guys, and call us when Tehran can hit New York." With sad regards to my friends in Europe, yes, that's what decades of incessant anti-Americanism have brought, and yes, a lot of Americans and not all of them conservatives, really do feel that way.

By then Iran will also be able to hit Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, the Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, and the Ukraine. I mention those countries in particular because they've all lost people supporting us in Iraq. So, for that matter, has Spain, its pullout and its current government of backstabbing Socialist twits despite. And others who have sent people include the Czech Republic, Armenia, Macedonia, Estonia, and Norway. So before we go through the "Europeans hate us" mantra we'd better remember that it's only the ones with the biggest mouths.

In the meantime, too, we would be dealing with the blows and buffets of the Iran oil weapon - their Oil Exchange - which is coming on line in July.

1 posted on 05/17/2006 6:49:39 PM PDT by FARS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: RaceBannon; Pan_Yans Wife; freedom44; jmc1969; FreeReign; odds; Cronos; decal; Valin; sionnsar; ...

Ping


2 posted on 05/17/2006 6:58:20 PM PDT by FARS (OK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FARS

Very well laid out case IMO.

Semper Fi'
Jarhead


3 posted on 05/17/2006 7:00:29 PM PDT by Buffettfan (VIVA LA MIGRA! - LONG LIVE THE MINUTEMEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FARS

If you're trying to make a point with an extended comparison to WWII, it helps your credibility if the historical narrative is not riddled with errors.


4 posted on 05/17/2006 7:01:16 PM PDT by Dr. Nobel Dynamite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FARS

ping


5 posted on 05/17/2006 7:03:45 PM PDT by Excellence (Since November 6, 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FARS

I agree with the sentiment of the article. One glaring error was that Ireland remained neutral in World War II. De Valera, of course like the rest of the IRA, had no use for the British and believed their defeat would gain the Irish the North.


6 posted on 05/17/2006 7:04:29 PM PDT by JimSEA (America cannot have an exit strategy from the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FARS

He may be a Writer and Lawyer but he's a pretty lousy WW2 historian.


7 posted on 05/17/2006 7:05:48 PM PDT by Dave Elias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FARS

I don't see much of an analogy.


9 posted on 05/17/2006 7:08:15 PM PDT by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FARS

Another glaring error that comes to mind is the assertion that none of America's allies could produce enough matériel for themselves. Canada bought arms from the USA but we exported far more than we imported, and Canada was Britain's lifeline in 1940-41.


11 posted on 05/17/2006 7:11:15 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Yay! It's Riding Season!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FARS

Germany declared war on us first. Do not even have to read any more of this article if the author gets that fact wrong.


12 posted on 05/17/2006 7:12:22 PM PDT by Iwentsouth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FARS

"I ran with Hitler!"


14 posted on 05/17/2006 7:13:02 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FARS
Gives the inquisition a bad name. And the reformation an undeserved good one. Catholic bashing even as a mere aside to make a point about somebody else. Not even aware of it, does it like breathing.
15 posted on 05/17/2006 7:15:07 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abigail Adams; AIC; airborne; AirForceBrat23; Alamo-Girl; ALOHA RONNIE; angelsonmyside; apackof2; ..

Pretty good article for family and friends who don't get it.

Troop supporters FYI ping.


17 posted on 05/17/2006 7:21:12 PM PDT by patriciaruth (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1562436/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FARS; rmlew; neverdem; nicmarlo; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Do not dub me shapka broham; Clemenza
Ireland

This guy better pick up a history book, Ireland was a neutral contry throughout WW II.

World War II began in 1928

No, it began on September 1939 with the invasion of Poland. Most of the figures and dates in this thing are wrong.



20 posted on 05/17/2006 7:26:50 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FARS

Iran is now completely encircled.

The Persian people need to act.



25 posted on 05/17/2006 7:31:55 PM PDT by Spruce (Keep your mitts off my wallet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FARS

I am coping this out and carring it with me, whenever some idiot says something...I will give it to them!!!!!!


26 posted on 05/17/2006 7:34:33 PM PDT by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FARS
Had Russia surrendered, then, Hitler would have been able to focus his entire campaign against the Brits, then America, and the Nazis would have won that war.

Germany could not have successfully invaded Britain. They had no means to do it. They didn't have a Navy, despite Britain's loss of ships to stop them. They did not have sufficient landing craft. Hitler was not a Navy man. He was an Army man. And in the end, he did not invade Britain because he simply did not have the resources to pull it off. Also, Churchill said, in his memoirs, that Britain would have used gas to stop an amphibious attack by Germany. It would have worked. So, we can rewrite the history books, but things happened as they were planned to happen. The Allies won,and Germany lost..primarily because it lacked balanced military might.

28 posted on 05/17/2006 7:40:38 PM PDT by ExtremeUnction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FARS

Thanks for the article. I took it to be very interesting and the comparisons with WWII was especially good. I am not a Historian, but still enjoyed the article, even though he may have been off on some of the facts. If, in fact he was.


32 posted on 05/17/2006 7:42:07 PM PDT by auggy ( http://www.wtv-zone.com/Mary/THISWILLMAKEYOUPROUD.HTML)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FARS
The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.

Common sense.

67 posted on 05/17/2006 8:33:52 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FARS

Fantastic article. President Bush should explain the situation this way.


71 posted on 05/17/2006 8:41:40 PM PDT by Theo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FARS
Why don't we see Peace Activist demonstrating in Iran, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, North Korea, in the places in the world that really need peace activism the most?

For the same reason that Alec Baldwin still lives in the States after having promised to move out of the country if Bush won.

75 posted on 05/17/2006 8:49:11 PM PDT by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson