Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"A HOUSE DIVIDED" - Pukin's FReeperversary Rant

Posted on 05/17/2006 7:47:58 AM PDT by Pukin Dog

Edited on 05/17/2006 8:30:59 AM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]

"A house divided against itself cannot stand." – Abraham Lincoln, 1858

It is getting somewhat strange around these parts when not only the President, but yesterday the First Lady was personally attacked by someone claiming to be a ‘Conservative’. Can there be any doubt that there are forces among us looking to drive a wedge between us?

A few weeks ago, this forum’s owner attempted to remind all of us of the big picture, that regardless of any personal animosity towards the President or Republican Party over their adherence to Conservative principles, that they are still a clear choice over the alternative Democrat Party rule. At that time, I assumed that FReeper-sanity had been restored, and that some of the negative rhetoric aimed at those in Washington D.C. would be dialed back.

Free Republic is a political forum with a proud history and vision, responsible for dragging Dan Rather from his post, and providing countless radio-talk shows with their daily talking points. FReepers are unique in their determination and energy towards protecting and defending the goals of our Founding Fathers.

We are also quite a powder keg of emotion and anticipation, expecting our Republican majorities to take advantage of this opportunity to make permanent gains in our Conservative agenda. Some might argue that this opportunity has been squandered, but those persons would be ignorant of history, lacking understanding that change cannot occur overnight in Washington, and that this is the way our Founders designed our Republic.

In frustration, impatience, and ignorance, we have allowed this forum to become a haven for those who do not share our Conservative goals. I do not blame our enemies anymore then I would blame a scorpion for stinging me. If anger and stupidity were one’s nature, I would expect the trolls that infect this forum to be angry and stupid consistently, which also makes them somewhat easy to detect.

The trolls are not the problem, though. The problem is that so many of us are allowing ourselves to be taken in by those who seek only to prevent us from going to the polls in November to keep their stinking hands off our government for another term. There can be no doubt, that no matter how disappointing our current government has been in promoting the Conservative agenda, that the alternative, enabled by our staying home will be MUCH worse.

The way to deal with Republicans who have actively worked against our goals is to defeat them in Primary elections. We do not even have to defeat them all, only enough of them to send the message that we will indeed target them if they work against our agenda. It should be the goal of EVERY conservative to see that Lincoln Chaffee is defeated in November. His seat is one we can afford to lose. Were I a Rhode Island resident, I would vote for the Democrat if only to send a message to Snowe, Hagel, Collins, Graham, and especially that bastard Specter that their primaries just got a lot tougher.

We only need to get one of them, and Chaffee is the one to get. It does not really matter if a Democrat takes his seat; he will be junior and mute as long as we maintain our overall majority in the Senate.

The one thing that bothers me here like nothing else, is the simple disrespect of the President. Am I am Bush-Bot? Damn straight I am. If you want to know why, click on my handle to read Southack’s excellent list of Bush’s accomplishments in office. But if Bush had done almost nothing in office, it would be no excuse for some of the slights and disrespect he has received from some of us on this forum.

Some of the things I have read here this past week match in tone what one can find on our favorite Democrat sewer site. Someone calling himself or herself a FReeper was promoting shooting aliens at the border until they stopped coming. Is that what we are about? Obviously not, and that so-called Conservative has been eliminated from this forum.

I think it is important to remember that you and I have just as much responsibility as George Bush does in changing our culture to better reflect Conservative values. Right now, this very moment, Conservatives have the government they deserve. We put them there. They are not our mommies and daddies sent out to bring home our Conservative bread. That responsibility lies with all of us. These Republicans represent us, they don’t serve us. Our job is to pick the best individual and send him/her to Washington in the hope that their CHARACTER will see them through.

This is why it is such a nutty thing to consider punishing the Republican party, when we should be letting them know that we’ve got their back, but if they cant do the job, we will replace them with ANOTHER Republican, instead of handing the reigns of government to the party of anger, hopelessness and despair. We sometimes like to think that those people we send to Washington are different from us, that they are capable of meeting our every need and desire.

I want every one of you to think about what you would consider to be your perfect mate. Maybe some of you think you have found that person. If you are married and totally in love with another person, that is great. Now I want to ask you to think about the last time that person you love, who is PERFECT for you, completely pissed you off. Remember, this is your perfect mate, your one true love. Do they do everything you want them to do? Obey your every desire? If you answer yes, I am going to put you on my troll list.

Those people in Washington do not even cut your lawn, yet you expect perfection. Get over it.

I am issuing a challenge to every person who considers him or her to be a Conservative; why don’t we all commit to a return to HONOR? Do we honor our Conservative agenda when we comport ourselves in disgraceful ways? Is it an honorable thing to suggest that our President is a moron, as I read here a few days ago? Is it honorable to attack Laura Bush or any other person representing true Conservative values?

Some of you might argue that George Bush is not representing Conservative values to your liking. I would remind you that the first thing Bush said upon taking office, is that he was going to be President of ALL the people, not just some. You know that if you followed Bush from the beginning that he campaigned of the very immigration platform he is defending right now. Did you vote for him? Yeah?

If you have ever had a steak at a Ruth’s Chris restaurant, you know that sometimes they bring that wonderful steak to your table with a sprig of parsley on it. I hate parsley. Hate it. If I were to treat my steak the way some of us want to treat our President, I would have to throw out the steak, due to that nasty parsley that comes with it. I can deal with the parsley to get the steak, and that is what I am asking FReepers to do.

Expecting perfection from any person, group or team is a recipe for disaster. George W. Bush is my president. You can disagree with him, you can blame him for your problems if that is your desire. If you disrespect his office, his service, his risking his life to be with our troops in Iraq, his steadfast desire to bring a new tone to Washington, or if you just like the way he keeps Democrats so pissed off they lose their minds on a regular basis, I ask you to treat him and his wife with respect and cut the personal attacks. If you call him ‘Shrub’ or ‘Jorge’ consider yourself my enemy.

Right now, our real enemy are the Main Stream Media, the Democrat Party, and all who follow and support them. If you want to jump-ugly on someone, why not start with those leaky bastards and give our side a break?

Do it for Pukin.

I knew that you could.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: breakingvanity; cereal; civilized; debate; dignity; fintanwashereandleft; honor; intelligent; juvenileramblings; notfeelinthelovehere; pingpower; reasonable; respect; tpd; trollexorcism; vanity; zotdissenters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 3,681 next last
To: Pukin Dog

Well done!


301 posted on 05/17/2006 9:18:40 AM PDT by whinecountry (Semper Ubi Sub Ubi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arbee4bush
That is too much pressure! Thanks.
302 posted on 05/17/2006 9:18:44 AM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I do not recall which party held the Senate majority during their confirmation hearings?

You can find lots of useful info on the net.

303 posted on 05/17/2006 9:18:49 AM PDT by Protagoras ("Sometimes the first duty of intelligent men is the restatement of the obvious".... George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
"Remember Ross Perot (and the wonderful thing he gave us)

I remember it more as a "No more taxes, read my lips" sort of moment. Perot may have taken advantage of the situation, but the afore mentioned phase is what keep most conservatives away.

304 posted on 05/17/2006 9:18:50 AM PDT by Post-Neolithic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper; onyx

Is there some kind of implication that the great unwashed '04-or-later Freepers are somehow defective? Sounds a little elitest.


305 posted on 05/17/2006 9:18:50 AM PDT by Lekker 1 (("Stocks have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau" - I. Fisher, Yale Econ Prof, 1929))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
You nailed it, Clancy. MANY are working here for the division and demise of the Republican Party and for their goal of a RAT victory in November.

You know, as a long time GOP supporter, it would be nice just once to not get accused of being a Democrat mole whenever I point out that I oppose amnesty. Much of the "hate" actually seems to come from those who follow Bush no matter what. I do believe that Bush's amnesty plan is dangerous to the future of our country. Pointing that out doesn't make me some kind of traitor, but that doesn't stop the "Bushbots" from calling me one.
306 posted on 05/17/2006 9:19:07 AM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Cecily; yellowdoghunter; trubluolyguy; Texaggie79; Denver Ditdat; Sir Gawain
The courageous among you are cordially invited to take issue with this vanity by posting a reply, as most do, instead of petty attacks via the keyword feature. Keep up your juvenile antics and you won't be around much longer.
307 posted on 05/17/2006 9:19:35 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vicomte13

We should stop calling people Bushbots. It's not fair.



How about Lemmings?


308 posted on 05/17/2006 9:19:36 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (If its such a great idea, lets see how well the capital and white house do with a virtual fence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
I agree with the President on his WOT, but not about immigration. As far as I know, I'm still free to have an opinion but since this is the first thread I've read this morning, I'm not sure.

Why would you even wonder about that, Lucy? I'm a Bush-Bot, but disagree with President Bush regarding the illegal invasion.

309 posted on 05/17/2006 9:19:47 AM PDT by onyx (Deport the trolls --- send them back to DU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

***I don't think that makes me a Bushbasher or disloyal.***

No, it makes you a fence sitter. I hope you're comfortable up there while the rest of us fight to keep the democrats/liberals from taking away our freedom.


310 posted on 05/17/2006 9:19:48 AM PDT by kitkat (The first step down to hell is to deny the existence of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Voting for RINOs just gets us more RINOs...


311 posted on 05/17/2006 9:19:58 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
BTTT.

While I don't agree with Bush on immigration and a smattering of other issues, but we must not lose sight of our goals. I have a firm belief that conservative values will win out in the end IF we don't place roadblocks due to our impatience.
The fact of the matter is that now is not the time to give up - oftentimes the hardest trials occur before the victory and, frankly, I don't think we're facing our toughest yet. Moreover, we can not use a short-term time line for conservatism - it has taken around 40 years to get where were at.
The best thing we can do is get involved with the party. Be a delegate, push out the RINOs, vote in the primaries. Not doing so completely plays into the opposition's hands. Here in Utah, Rep. Cannon (pro-amnesty etc) was forced into a primary (his opponent - Jacobs - got 52% of the delegate vote). This couldn't have been done if conservatives sulked at home.
Impatience is motivation (which is good), but it must be tempered by an uncompromising willingness to fight for the ultimate objective no matter how long it takes.
IOW - No matter how long the fight, CONSERVATISM WILL WIN if we don't give up.

312 posted on 05/17/2006 9:20:21 AM PDT by batter ("Never let the enemy pick the battle site." - Gen. George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
Are you telling me DeWine didn't have an advantage over his challengers due to the party infrastructure?

No. But I'm telling you that Jim Petro had the advantage over Ken Blackwell due to party infrastructure, and the voters overrode it.

It's the PEOPLE who make the decisions, sam. That's what this country is all about.

Placing blame on the party alone may be convenient, but it's not Constitutional.

I didn't prove your point. But you provided me a fine opportunity to prove mine.

313 posted on 05/17/2006 9:20:22 AM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
" Criticizing Bush wont put you on my troll list. Disrespecting the office of the President of the United States will."

I am always respectful of the office of the President and I try to be respectful when I criticize the man. I will not however sit back and silently watch as my country rushes into a train wreck of unprecedented magnitude. The demographics associated with this amnesty debacle will be an absolute disaster.

314 posted on 05/17/2006 9:20:40 AM PDT by Desron13 (If you constantly vote between the lesser of two evils then evil is your ultimate destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
Right, vote Republican so you can get the Justices you deserve.

You have your history backwards. Because the country DIDN'T vote Republican in 1986, the Senate flipped to a Democrat majority, which lead directly to the Borking, which resulted in Kennedy and Souter.

So, go right ahead and "teach them" another lesson this year, and it will be another 20 years before we get another chance to solidify a Supreme Court majority.

315 posted on 05/17/2006 9:21:00 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
My policy with day-laborers was "dont ask, dont tell" and I have made that point many, many times. We wont be 'allowing amnesty', if anything, we will be taking our lumps for those we selected in the Senate (Hagel) who would put forward such a sucky bill in the first place. We can punish them all in the primaries without giving the Democrats a victory.

Point noted, as is your post - well done.

I do not support the immigration policy of President Bush and have contacted elected officials asking them to not to support his position. But that should not mean that folks get nasty, rude and disrespectful to either him or Mrs. Bush. And that sort of disrespect has certainly been more and more frequent on this forum, despite the good efforts of the moderators.

All in all, President Bush has done a yeoman's job as President which is all the more remarkable given the way the drive-by media has conducted themselves the last six years, especially the last two years - they're disgraceful.

316 posted on 05/17/2006 9:21:01 AM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

I did post on the thread and my keywords were all in fun....as I have seen done many times before.


317 posted on 05/17/2006 9:21:01 AM PDT by yellowdoghunter (I sometimes only vote for Republicans because they are not Democrats....by Dr. Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
I'm going to vote in November no matter what. And my vote is not going to a democrat nor a third party candidate. Period.
318 posted on 05/17/2006 9:21:04 AM PDT by b4its2late (If it's treason, there's no doubt a democrat is standing behind it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Any freeper who does that has lost all credibility with me. I am one who has avoided commenting lately..It seemed like some threads were coming from the opposition and every thread turned into an immigration or bash Bush thread..

There have always been fierce differences expressed on this forum. The "jorge" and bushbot.."supports anything with an R by the name" slams but most of all hatred and disrespect shown to the President just turned me off. I would call a lot of what I read hysteria and perfectionism mixed. We have virtually allowed those voices to dominate..I am guilty of protecting my blood pressure.

We can disagree but with honor..I have never agreed with any President on all things..

Remember the admonitions about cutting off your nose to spite your face.

We are at war for heavens sake and this War on Terror is uppermost in my mind. I hope I can live to see it through.

I thank God George Bush is my President at this time in history. I thank God for our men and women serving our country and the families who support them.

Thank you for the rant.


319 posted on 05/17/2006 9:21:04 AM PDT by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
At the same time, the GOP threw DeLay under a bus, and would support McPain as their standard bearer if they thought he was moderate enough. So again, damnedifIno.

I don't know a single FReeper, other than recent sign-ons, who advocated that DeLay "hit the road". The GOP for the most part, stayed the hell out of the fray. The Democrats and certain FReepers put a bullseye on his back and they were willing to use it. Delay stepped down and retired because he knew it.

He's not going anywhere. He's going to be speaking for and stumping for GOP candidates in future elections.

As to McCain, I'm not the least bit worried about him. He won't be nominated in the first place anyway.

As to you, you need some new talking points which to shoot down. The same tired old ranting gets old.

320 posted on 05/17/2006 9:21:23 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 3,681 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson