Bush set for immigration speech

WRIC News ^ | 5-14-06 | AP

[JustPiper]

BUSH SET FOR IMMIGRATION SPEECH WHITE HOUSE President Bush is getting set for a prime-time speech on immigration tomorrow night. Aides note the 8 p-m, Eastern Time, speech will be the president's first from the Oval Office that does not involve Iraq and the war on terrorism. And they say that reflects Bush's "passion" on immigration. He's speaking as the Senate is poised to clear a compromise measure including his idea for a guest worker program. However, a rival House bill is limited to a border crackdown, and meshing the two won't be easy. Stand Up For America !

"We have room for but one flag, the American flag...
We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language...
And we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

  organizations that protect our borders   |
...all links open to new browsers.

[JustPiper]

did you check TM and breaking news here?

I posted last night I also heard on the scanner here in Chgo that DHS was downtown at Clark and Lake, dunno why

[JustPiper]

no I didn't
~Smacking myself

[JustPiper]

~Smiles

[TheLion]

A Must Read!


Immigration Bill Is Worse Than You Think

Human Events ^ | May 25 2006 | Senator Jeff Sessions
Posted on 05/25/2006 8:00:41 PM EDT by Reagan Man
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1638411/posts

[Kimberly GG]

Found this on another thread......spelling is off a little, but I wonder if accurate? And wonder how to get a list of the picks from the House?



Thia ia rhw list of conferees

Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA)
Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA)
Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT)
Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA)
Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE)
Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ)
Senator Herb Kohl (D-WI)
Senator Mike DeWine (R-OH)
Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI)
Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC)
Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY)
Senator John Cornyn (R-TX)
Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL)
Senator Mel Martinez (R-FL)
Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NE)

[JustPiper]

Will do thanks for da link Meooooowroarrrrr

[TheLion]

LOL....my computer finally crashed but it has a partitioned hard drive that restores everything....amazing. Works pretty good now.

[Smartass]

TRAITOR IN CHIEF
Ted Kennedy and I...

[JustPiper]

Crap all the traitors!
Also here are 22 traitors that voted yes:

The 22 Republicans Senators who voted for the Senate immigration reform bill, S.2611.

****
Bennett
Brownback
Chafee
Coleman
Collins
Craig
DeWine
Domenici
Frist
Graham
Gregg
Lugar
Martinez
McCain
McConnell
Murkowski
Smith
Snowe
Specter
Stevens
Voinovich
Warner
****
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15165

If you have any of these traitors in your state mail them funny money for their reelection and work hard to get them out!!!

[JustPiper]

[potlatch]

Good picture!

[Arizona Carolyn]

That's what I think is going on. None of this is coincidence. I don't belive in coincidence.

[Smartass]

Thanks...

 

[exhaustedmomma]

The most sickening part is this is the type of "citizen" these scumbag elected representative are pandering to... & we have to pick of the tab on. It is just insulting to the inth degree. Some prof from William and Mary University/College said it best today on Lou Dobbs: This crazy senate bill is like saying a bank robber is an undocumented investment broker. (or something like that) IIRC, willian and mary is about as liberal of a college as you get.

[SeaBiscuit]

Talk about sickening..

"There's no question that putting up a wall, assigning the National Guard, could have a chilling effect on tourism, the relationship between the two countries, economic ties," the mayor told reporters on the eve of his meeting with Mexican President Vicente Fox.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1638507/posts

[Smartass]

NADA

 

[TheLion]

May 25, 2006
What the Base Thinks

The Bush administration and Republican Senators have badly misjudged both the attitudes of most Republicans (and, of course, most Americans) toward illegal immigration, and the intensity of those views. While we have opposed the Senate plan, we have been pretty mild-mannered about it. So I'm turning the microphone over to my friend Bob Cunningham. No one I know of argues immigration-related issues more cogently. Equally important, no one I know of conveys the white-hot anger and sense of betrayal that millions of Americans feel about this issue more effectively.

We know that this site is widely read in the White House and in Congress. To all Republicans in Washington: please, please read what follows with care, and understand that Bob speaks for most Americans and the overwhelming majority of Republicans:

Here's what they're missing, and it is the principal reason, in my opinion, WHY the anti-ILLEGAL forces are so upset -- and so powerful.

It has to do with the bad faith, calculated deceit, Orwellian propaganda, dishonest sophistry, misdirection, arrogance, presumption, indifference to, and, indeed, contempt for the beliefs of huge numbers of ordinary Americans -- including LEGAL immigrants and Hispanic natives! --- on the part of political/media elites.

Let's recognize that the political process has --- democratically --- designated the illegals AS illegal. Why? Because we, as a nation, decided that their presence -- NOT themselves per se (as the false attribution of racism would have it) --- but their presence in such numbers for such purposes (the phony Jobs Americans Won't Do/Jobs Americans Are Not Doing) is undesirable. There are perfectly reasonable grounds for that judgment. When did we vote for the Mexification of America? ANS.: NEVER....Indeed, going back to the 1965 immigration "reforms", assurances were REPEATEDLY given (Kennedy) that such reforms would NOT lead to an influx or demographic change. And guess what? The burden of proof is NOT on the nation to justify this stance.

Period. Full stop. End of discussion.

Since these elites don't like that decision now they want us to accept a fait accompli..and more! They feel perfectly justified in collaborating in the subversion of our democratically enacted immigration regime --- with crass, narrow, economic special interests and with others having perhaps more sinister designs. Their objectives --- open borders, a free flow of cheap labor --- are plain now for all to see. Some no longer even bother to pretend otherwise.

Given that, there is NO REASON to believe ANY of their promises --- the "wall," enforcement of "tough" conditions for a "path to legalization/citizenship" or limits in a "tough and smart" "temporary" "guest workers" indentured servant-helot program. We also know that the very underlying rationale itself for "temporary" "guest workers" (the economically illiterate JAWD/JAAND) is in DIRECT CONTRADICTION to ANY arbitrary "limits"....Indeed, the very claim itself that deportation is "impossible" renders the enforcement promises self-refuting! We should all ignore the false promises and intentional non-feasance in the past?...and do I even have to mention the Simpson-Mazzoli fraud? "This time it's different"?....we REALLY mean it now?....

The ultimate retort of the immigration celebrationists --- let us call it the "immigrants are good people" argument --- is totally beside the point. It is an assertion that no one would disagree with, but it is also an argument that has NO internal LIMITING PRINCIPLE. There is, on its own terms, no non-arbitrary basis for excluding ANY ONE of the 6 billion non-Americans. Other than criminal disqualification, most of them, are, indeed "good people"....so what?

Well, we already decided the question of numbers and limits...and the political/media elites, in conjunction with the scofflaw employers, do NOT have standing to subvert the democratic decision made, upon deliberation, several times in reliance on what we now can see were plainly false promises.

Never again.

Posted by John at 03:17 PM
http://powerlineblog.com/archives/014194.php

[Arizona Carolyn]

Did you see this thread? Rush asked some good questions. You can see the party line in the answers.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1638370/posts

[nicmarlo]

No, I didn't. Sorry for delayed response. I had to do my homework; now my e-mail account is frozen (temporarily, and don't know for how long); I can't get in to check my messages from our trusted friend.

[Arizona Carolyn]

This is another good article:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1617693/posts?page=1