Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress readies broad new digital copyright bill
CNET ^ | 4/23/2006 | Declan McCullagh

Posted on 04/24/2006 7:51:04 AM PDT by FewsOrange

For the last few years, a coalition of technology companies, academics and computer programmers has been trying to persuade Congress to scale back the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

Now Congress is preparing to do precisely the opposite. A proposed copyright law seen by CNET News.com would expand the DMCA's restrictions on software that can bypass copy protections and grant federal police more wiretapping and enforcement powers.

The draft legislation, created by the Bush administration and backed by Rep. Lamar Smith, already enjoys the support of large copyright holders such as the Recording Industry Association of America. Smith is the chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee that oversees intellectual-property law.

Smith's press secretary, Terry Shawn, said Friday that the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2006 is expected to "be introduced in the near future."

"The bill as a whole does a lot of good things," said Keith Kupferschmid, vice president for intellectual property and enforcement at the Software and Information Industry Association in Washington, D.C. "It gives the (Justice Department) the ability to do things to combat IP crime that they now can't presently do."

During a speech in November, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales endorsed the idea and said at the time that he would send Congress draft legislation. Such changes are necessary because new technology is "encouraging large-scale criminal enterprises to get involved in intellectual-property theft," Gonzales said, adding that proceeds from the illicit businesses are used, "quite frankly, to fund terrorism activities."

The 24-page bill is a far-reaching medley of different proposals cobbled together. One would, for instance, create a new federal crime of just trying to commit copyright infringement. Such willful attempts at piracy, even if they fail, could be punished by up to 10 years in prison...

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; copyright; statists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-276 next last
To: mysterio

Everyone who speaks to him comes to the same conclusion. He's definitely a shill. Look at his posting history.


121 posted on 04/25/2006 11:50:16 AM PDT by FLAMING DEATH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Oh, and also, GWB has an IPOD. Is he a terrorist?

I'm also going to need some links that prove that burning a cd for personal use sends more money to terrorism than when you fill your gas tank, and activity that actually does provide money to terrorists.
122 posted on 04/25/2006 11:55:13 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

You like the DMCA?

The DMCA that was written by the World Intellectual Property Organization, a section of the United Nations, of which China, Iran, and Vietnam are all members?

The DMCA, that was implemented under the careful watch of Bill Clinton?

That's what you're advocating?


123 posted on 04/25/2006 11:55:20 AM PDT by FLAMING DEATH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
Yet another reason to NOT vote for Republicans this November.

I suppose the Dems are going to protect your "rights" then, eh?

Here's the trick. Don't vote for any liberals, regardless of party. That will help move the country in the right direction.
124 posted on 04/25/2006 11:56:14 AM PDT by Antoninus (I will not vote for a liberal, regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Good point.


125 posted on 04/25/2006 11:59:13 AM PDT by FLAMING DEATH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: FreePaul

It's transparent pandering to the media companies. Coated with a veneer of anti-terrorist patriotism. Disgusting. I have long harbored the suspicion that our two-party system is really a one-party system. Very little has occurred recently to disabuse me of that notion.


126 posted on 04/25/2006 12:01:08 PM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: One-Four-Five
I'm talking about legal copying

Then you obviously have nothing to worry about.

127 posted on 04/25/2006 12:02:46 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Well said! I vote for the most conservative candidate, period!

The only exception I will make is if the second most conservative is close enough for my taste and has a better chance of wining..

128 posted on 04/25/2006 12:10:26 PM PDT by N3WBI3 ("I can kill you with my brain" -River Tam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Smith's measure would expand those civil and criminal restrictions. Instead of merely targeting distribution, the new language says nobody may "make, import, export, obtain control of, or possess" such anticircumvention tools if they may be redistributed to someone else.

I will be contacting my senator Coleman (MN) on this part..

129 posted on 04/25/2006 12:15:18 PM PDT by N3WBI3 ("I can kill you with my brain" -River Tam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

on piracy no. but on fair use? that's an essential right for the consumer, the paying consumer.


130 posted on 04/25/2006 12:15:39 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

What version of Linux do you use and with what program can you play WMV files? Freepmail me please, thanks!


131 posted on 04/25/2006 12:18:57 PM PDT by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: pctech

Download Kaffeine, Kplayer or Mplayer...

Copy the Essential Codec Pack from here :http://www.mplayerhq.hu/MPlayer/releases/codecs/essential-20050412.tar.bz2

Unzip and copy to /usr/lib/win32 or /usr/lib/codecs (make these directories if they don't exist.


132 posted on 04/25/2006 12:23:55 PM PDT by FLAMING DEATH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: pctech

PS...this should also allow you to play Quicktime files.


133 posted on 04/25/2006 12:24:59 PM PDT by FLAMING DEATH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: FLAMING DEATH
Copy the Essential Codec Pack from here

I'd be careful recommending your foreign hacker sites from now on!

134 posted on 04/25/2006 12:43:24 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

mplayer r teh hax0rz! Oh noes!


135 posted on 04/25/2006 1:08:06 PM PDT by CLRGuy (If crypto is security, then trees are houses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

Unless I'm making a legal copy of a Sony BMG product with XCP onto my computer. Or one with MediaMax, whose danger has been well documented, and whose use was not restricted to Sony BMG. Then I have a problem, don't I?

Ignore everything else I have to say if you please, but for Pete's sake, address this, if you would. The person who uncovered Sony BMG's rootkit was in violation of the DMCA, and would face penalties if they decided to prosecute him. This legislation aims to stiffen those penalties. Therefore, the only person with the courage to come forward & let the public know of the existence of the rootkit would be subject to those stiffer penalties.

This is what you're advocating. We're supposed to assume that no rights holders would install such illegal spyware? And we're supposed to accept that it's illegal to even find the stuff?


136 posted on 04/25/2006 2:01:13 PM PDT by One-Four-Five
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: CLRGuy

lol!


137 posted on 04/25/2006 2:50:42 PM PDT by N3WBI3 ("I can kill you with my brain" - River Tam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: One-Four-Five

Didn't even the Sony rootkit allow a few legal copies to be made?


138 posted on 04/25/2006 4:31:12 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

When I run across a "foreign hacker site", I'll be careful. Never had a problem with Mplayer or their codec packs, or for that matter, any piece of OSS that I've ever downloaded.

Thanks for your fake concern. So, do you like the DMCA?


139 posted on 04/25/2006 4:33:18 PM PDT by FLAMING DEATH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

Oh, yeah. That more than makes up for them leaving my computer vulnerable by installing undetectable software.

/sarcasm

First you defend Planned Parenthood, then the UN authored DMCA, now the Sony rootkit. We're all getting a good idea of where your loyalties lie.


140 posted on 04/25/2006 4:35:28 PM PDT by FLAMING DEATH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-276 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson